AI in Action: A Road Map From the Radiology AI Council for Effective Model Evaluation and Deployment

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hari Trivedi MD , Bardia Khosravi MD, MPH, MHPE , Judy Gichoya MD, MS , Laura Benson , Damian Dyckman MD, PhD , James Galt PhD , Brian M. Howard MD , Elias G. Kikano MD , Jean Kunjummen DO , Neil Lall MD , Xiao T. Li MD , Sumir Patel MD , Nabile Safdar MD, MPH , Ninad Salastekar MD, MPH , Colin Segovis MD, PhD , Marly van Assen PhD , Peter Harri MD
{"title":"AI in Action: A Road Map From the Radiology AI Council for Effective Model Evaluation and Deployment","authors":"Hari Trivedi MD ,&nbsp;Bardia Khosravi MD, MPH, MHPE ,&nbsp;Judy Gichoya MD, MS ,&nbsp;Laura Benson ,&nbsp;Damian Dyckman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;James Galt PhD ,&nbsp;Brian M. Howard MD ,&nbsp;Elias G. Kikano MD ,&nbsp;Jean Kunjummen DO ,&nbsp;Neil Lall MD ,&nbsp;Xiao T. Li MD ,&nbsp;Sumir Patel MD ,&nbsp;Nabile Safdar MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ninad Salastekar MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Colin Segovis MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marly van Assen PhD ,&nbsp;Peter Harri MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology workflows continues to evolve, establishing standardized processes for the evaluation and deployment of AI models is crucial to ensure success. This article outlines the creation of a Radiology AI Council at a large academic center and subsequent development of framework in the form of a rubric to formalize the evaluation of radiology AI models and onboard them into clinical workflows. The rubric aims to address the challenges faced during the deployment of AI models, such as real-world model performance, workflow implementation, resource allocation, return on investment, and impact to the broader health system. Using this comprehensive rubric, the council aims to ensure that the process for selecting AI models is both standardized and transparent. This article outlines the steps taken to establish this rubric, its components, and the initial results from evaluation of 13 models over an 8-month period. We emphasize the importance of holistic model evaluation beyond performance metrics, and transparency and objectivity in AI model evaluation, with the goal of improving the efficacy and safety of AI models in radiology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 9","pages":"Pages 1041-1049"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025002996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into radiology workflows continues to evolve, establishing standardized processes for the evaluation and deployment of AI models is crucial to ensure success. This article outlines the creation of a Radiology AI Council at a large academic center and subsequent development of framework in the form of a rubric to formalize the evaluation of radiology AI models and onboard them into clinical workflows. The rubric aims to address the challenges faced during the deployment of AI models, such as real-world model performance, workflow implementation, resource allocation, return on investment, and impact to the broader health system. Using this comprehensive rubric, the council aims to ensure that the process for selecting AI models is both standardized and transparent. This article outlines the steps taken to establish this rubric, its components, and the initial results from evaluation of 13 models over an 8-month period. We emphasize the importance of holistic model evaluation beyond performance metrics, and transparency and objectivity in AI model evaluation, with the goal of improving the efficacy and safety of AI models in radiology.
行动中的人工智能:放射学人工智能委员会有效模型评估和部署的路线图。
随着人工智能(AI)与放射学工作流程的整合不断发展,为评估和部署AI模型建立标准化流程对于确保成功至关重要。本文概述了在大型学术中心创建放射学人工智能委员会以及随后以标题形式开发框架,以正式确定放射学人工智能模型的评估并将其纳入临床工作流程。该标题旨在解决在部署人工智能模型期间面临的挑战,例如实际模型性能、工作流程实施、资源分配、投资回报以及对更广泛卫生系统的影响。使用这一综合标准,理事会旨在确保选择人工智能模型的过程既标准化又透明。本文概述了建立这一准则所采取的步骤,它的组成部分,以及在8个月期间对13个模型进行评估的初步结果。我们强调超越性能指标的整体模型评估的重要性,以及人工智能模型评估的透明度和客观性,以提高人工智能模型在放射学中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信