Probabilistic Graphical Models for Evaluating the Utility of Data-Driven ICD Code Categories in Pediatric Sepsis.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Lourdes A Valdez, Edgar Javier Hernandez, O'Connor Matthews, Matthew Mulvey, Hillary Crandall, Karen Eilbeck
{"title":"Probabilistic Graphical Models for Evaluating the Utility of Data-Driven ICD Code Categories in Pediatric Sepsis.","authors":"Lourdes A Valdez, Edgar Javier Hernandez, O'Connor Matthews, Matthew Mulvey, Hillary Crandall, Karen Eilbeck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic health records (EHRs) are information systems designed to collect and manage clinical data in order to support various clinical activities. They have emerged as valuable sources of data for outcomes research, offering vast repositories of patient information for analysis. Definitions for pediatric sepsis diagnosis are ambiguous, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the need for precise and efficient patient categorizing techniques. Nevertheless, the use of EHRs in research poses challenges. Although EHRs were originally created to document patient encounters, the medical coding was designed to satisfy billing requirements. As a result, EHR data may lack granularity, potentially leading to misclassification and incomplete representation of patient conditions. We compared data-driven ICD code categories to chart review using probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) due to their ability to handle uncertainty and incorporate prior knowledge. Overall, this paper demonstrates the potential of using PGMs to address these challenges and improve the analysis of ICD codes for sepsis outcomes research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1149-1158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are information systems designed to collect and manage clinical data in order to support various clinical activities. They have emerged as valuable sources of data for outcomes research, offering vast repositories of patient information for analysis. Definitions for pediatric sepsis diagnosis are ambiguous, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the need for precise and efficient patient categorizing techniques. Nevertheless, the use of EHRs in research poses challenges. Although EHRs were originally created to document patient encounters, the medical coding was designed to satisfy billing requirements. As a result, EHR data may lack granularity, potentially leading to misclassification and incomplete representation of patient conditions. We compared data-driven ICD code categories to chart review using probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) due to their ability to handle uncertainty and incorporate prior knowledge. Overall, this paper demonstrates the potential of using PGMs to address these challenges and improve the analysis of ICD codes for sepsis outcomes research.

评估数据驱动的ICD代码类别在儿童败血症中的效用的概率图形模型。
电子健康记录(EHRs)是一种信息系统,旨在收集和管理临床数据,以支持各种临床活动。它们已经成为结果研究的宝贵数据来源,为分析提供了大量的患者信息。儿童败血症诊断的定义不明确,导致诊断和治疗延迟,强调需要精确和有效的患者分类技术。然而,在研究中使用电子病历带来了挑战。虽然最初创建电子病历是为了记录患者就诊情况,但医疗编码的设计是为了满足计费需求。因此,EHR数据可能缺乏粒度,可能导致错误分类和对患者病情的不完整表示。我们将数据驱动的ICD代码类别与使用概率图形模型(PGMs)的图表审查进行了比较,因为它们具有处理不确定性和合并先验知识的能力。总的来说,本文展示了使用pgm来解决这些挑战并改进败血症结局研究中ICD代码分析的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信