Acceptability of pictographs as a novel patient identifier to improve patient safety in the neonatal intensive care unit.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Hojjat Salmasian, Carmina Erdei, Joanne R Applebaum, Danielle Sharon, Katie Hannon, Deborah Cuddyer, Mary Sawyer, Tina Steele, Yvonne Sheldon, I-Fong S Lehman, Joseph E Schwartz, Allen Chen, Jason Adelman
{"title":"Acceptability of pictographs as a novel patient identifier to improve patient safety in the neonatal intensive care unit.","authors":"Hojjat Salmasian, Carmina Erdei, Joanne R Applebaum, Danielle Sharon, Katie Hannon, Deborah Cuddyer, Mary Sawyer, Tina Steele, Yvonne Sheldon, I-Fong S Lehman, Joseph E Schwartz, Allen Chen, Jason Adelman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of a randomized controlled trial on the use of pictographs (images used in lieu of a patient photo) embedded in the electronic health record to reduce wrong-patient errors in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), we conducted a series of surveys of parents, providers and nurses in the NICU. Data from survey responses were thematically analyzed and categorized. We found that in all groups, there was very high awareness of the intended purpose of the pictographs; however, the perception of providers and nurses about the effectiveness of pictographs was not as strong. While several providers and nurses acknowledged that pictographs can or have helped them avoid wrong-patient errors when caring for multiple birth infants (such as twins), many nurses believed that their current practice of the use of two patient identifiers was sufficient, and pictographs were not useful. Parents reported that pictographs improved their experience of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"980-986"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of a randomized controlled trial on the use of pictographs (images used in lieu of a patient photo) embedded in the electronic health record to reduce wrong-patient errors in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), we conducted a series of surveys of parents, providers and nurses in the NICU. Data from survey responses were thematically analyzed and categorized. We found that in all groups, there was very high awareness of the intended purpose of the pictographs; however, the perception of providers and nurses about the effectiveness of pictographs was not as strong. While several providers and nurses acknowledged that pictographs can or have helped them avoid wrong-patient errors when caring for multiple birth infants (such as twins), many nurses believed that their current practice of the use of two patient identifiers was sufficient, and pictographs were not useful. Parents reported that pictographs improved their experience of care.

可接受的象形文字作为一种新的患者标识符,以提高新生儿重症监护病房的患者安全。
作为一项随机对照试验的一部分,我们对新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的父母、医护人员和护士进行了一系列调查,研究了在电子健康记录中使用象形文字(用图像代替患者照片)来减少错误的患者。从调查反馈的数据进行主题分析和分类。我们发现,在所有的小组中,人们对象形文字的预期目的都有很高的认识;然而,提供者和护士对象形文字的有效性的看法并不强烈。虽然一些提供者和护士承认,在照顾多胞胎(如双胞胎)时,象形文字可以或已经帮助他们避免了错误的患者错误,但许多护士认为,他们目前使用两个患者标识符的做法已经足够了,象形文字没有用处。家长们报告说,象形文字改善了他们的照顾体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信