Comparison of pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block for hip fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mustafa Aslan , Alper Kilicaslan , Funda Gök , Ahmet Fevzi Kekec , Tahsin Sami Colak
{"title":"Comparison of pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block for hip fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Mustafa Aslan ,&nbsp;Alper Kilicaslan ,&nbsp;Funda Gök ,&nbsp;Ahmet Fevzi Kekec ,&nbsp;Tahsin Sami Colak","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study compared the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) block to the anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) in patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective, double-blind trial, 80 adults scheduled for THA under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either an anterior QLB (n = 40) with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or a combined PENG + LFCN block (n = 40) using 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine for PENG and 5 mL for LFCN. The primary outcome was cumulative 24 hour postoperative intravenous morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, quadriceps strength, patient satisfaction and side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences were observed between the groups in morphine consumption or pain scores during the first 12 hours (p &gt; 0.05). At 24 hours, the PENG + LFCN group demonstrated significantly lower morphine consumption (p = 0.027) and resting VAS scores (p &lt; 0.001). Quadriceps weakness occurred in 15% (6/40) of anterior QLB patients at 6 hours (p = 0.026), whereas no weakness was observed in the PENG + LFCN group within 24 hours. Patient satisfaction and the incidence of complications were comparable between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both anterior QLB and PENG + LFCN blocks provide effective analgesia for up to 12 hours post-THA. However, the PENG + LFCN combination offers prolonged analgesia, reduced opioid requirements and better preservation of quadriceps strength.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 5","pages":"Article 844643"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study compared the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) block to the anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) in patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

In this prospective, double-blind trial, 80 adults scheduled for THA under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either an anterior QLB (n = 40) with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or a combined PENG + LFCN block (n = 40) using 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine for PENG and 5 mL for LFCN. The primary outcome was cumulative 24 hour postoperative intravenous morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, quadriceps strength, patient satisfaction and side effects.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the groups in morphine consumption or pain scores during the first 12 hours (p > 0.05). At 24 hours, the PENG + LFCN group demonstrated significantly lower morphine consumption (p = 0.027) and resting VAS scores (p < 0.001). Quadriceps weakness occurred in 15% (6/40) of anterior QLB patients at 6 hours (p = 0.026), whereas no weakness was observed in the PENG + LFCN group within 24 hours. Patient satisfaction and the incidence of complications were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Both anterior QLB and PENG + LFCN blocks provide effective analgesia for up to 12 hours post-THA. However, the PENG + LFCN combination offers prolonged analgesia, reduced opioid requirements and better preservation of quadriceps strength.
髋部骨折手术中囊周神经群阻滞与腰前方肌阻滞的比较:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较全髋关节置换术(THA)患者囊包神经组(PENG)阻滞联合股外侧皮神经(LFCN)阻滞与腰方肌前阻滞(QLB)的疗效。方法:在这项前瞻性双盲试验中,80名计划在脊髓麻醉下进行THA的成年人随机接受前路QLB (n = 40),其中30 mL 0.25%布比卡因或PENG + LFCN联合阻滞(n = 40),使用25 mL 0.25%布比卡因用于PENG和5 mL用于LFCN。主要终点是术后24小时静脉注射吗啡的累计用量。次要结局包括疼痛评分、股四头肌力量、患者满意度和副作用。结果:两组间吗啡用量及疼痛评分前12 h比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。24小时时,PENG + LFCN组吗啡用量显著降低(p = 0.027),静息VAS评分显著降低(p < 0.001)。15%(6/40)的前路QLB患者在6小时内出现股四头肌无力(p = 0.026),而PENG + LFCN组在24小时内未观察到股四头肌无力。两组患者满意度和并发症发生率具有可比性。结论:前路QLB和PENG + LFCN阻滞均可在tha后12小时内提供有效的镇痛。然而,PENG + LFCN联合治疗可延长镇痛时间,减少阿片类药物需求,更好地保存股四头肌力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信