Behavior Shifts in Patient Portal Usage During and After Policy Changes Around Test Result Delivery and Notification.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Uday Suresh, Bryan D Steitz, S Trent Rosenbloom, Kevin N Griffith, Jessica S Ancker
{"title":"Behavior Shifts in Patient Portal Usage During and After Policy Changes Around Test Result Delivery and Notification.","authors":"Uday Suresh, Bryan D Steitz, S Trent Rosenbloom, Kevin N Griffith, Jessica S Ancker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of the 21st Century Cures Act, many health systems now release all test results into patient portals immediately. To investigate if changes in access to test results shifted patient portal usage, we used data from the electronic health record to evaluate how patients behaved after this policy change and a subsequent policy adjustment requiring patients to opt in for notifications about new test results. We found that following institutional compliance with the Cures Act, proportions of patients who scheduled a new appointment and messaged their clinician after accessing a new test result increased, both by 4.5%. After removing automatic notifications of new results, the proportion of patients who scheduled a new appointment increased by 2.1%, and the proportion of patients who had telemedicine encounters decreased by 0.8%. Our work identified changes in patient behavior that track how policy changes map to burden for clinicians and information-seeking behavior in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1089-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of the 21st Century Cures Act, many health systems now release all test results into patient portals immediately. To investigate if changes in access to test results shifted patient portal usage, we used data from the electronic health record to evaluate how patients behaved after this policy change and a subsequent policy adjustment requiring patients to opt in for notifications about new test results. We found that following institutional compliance with the Cures Act, proportions of patients who scheduled a new appointment and messaged their clinician after accessing a new test result increased, both by 4.5%. After removing automatic notifications of new results, the proportion of patients who scheduled a new appointment increased by 2.1%, and the proportion of patients who had telemedicine encounters decreased by 0.8%. Our work identified changes in patient behavior that track how policy changes map to burden for clinicians and information-seeking behavior in patients.

在测试结果传递和通知政策改变期间和之后,患者门户使用的行为变化。
由于《21世纪治愈法案》,许多卫生系统现在立即向患者门户网站发布所有检测结果。为了调查访问检测结果的变化是否改变了患者门户的使用情况,我们使用电子健康记录中的数据来评估患者在这一政策变化和随后的政策调整后的行为,这些政策调整要求患者选择接受有关新检测结果的通知。我们发现,在机构遵守《治愈法案》之后,在获得新的检测结果后安排新预约并给临床医生发信息的患者比例增加了4.5%。在取消新结果的自动通知后,安排新预约的患者比例增加了2.1%,远程医疗就诊的患者比例下降了0.8%。我们的工作确定了患者行为的变化,跟踪政策变化如何映射到临床医生的负担和患者的信息寻求行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信