Design, Rational, and Baseline Characteristics of the SONIC-HF Multicenter Registry.

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
JMA journal Pub Date : 2025-04-28 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0364
Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Kentaro Kamiya, Misako Toki, Hiroshi Saito, Kentaro Iwata, Yuya Matsue, Kenji Yoshioka, Kazuya Saito, Azusa Murata, Akihiro Hayashida, Junya Ako, Takeshi Kitai, Emi Maekawa
{"title":"Design, Rational, and Baseline Characteristics of the SONIC-HF Multicenter Registry.","authors":"Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Kentaro Kamiya, Misako Toki, Hiroshi Saito, Kentaro Iwata, Yuya Matsue, Kenji Yoshioka, Kazuya Saito, Azusa Murata, Akihiro Hayashida, Junya Ako, Takeshi Kitai, Emi Maekawa","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Skeletal muscle mass and function are crucial for assessing physical frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia, which significantly impact the prognosis of geriatric patients with heart failure (HF). Ultrasound-based assessment of skeletal muscles offers a non-invasive, real-time alternative to traditional methods. The <i>compariSON of various methods In evaluatIon of sarCopenia in patients with Heart Failure</i> study (SONIC-HF) aimed to evaluate the feasibility and prognostic impact of ultrasound-based muscle assessment in geriatric patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled patients with HF aged ≥65 years who could ambulate independently at discharge. Certified observers assessed muscle thickness (biceps, quadriceps, rectus femoris, and diaphragm) using ultrasound at rest and during contraction. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits, and cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 692 enrolled patients (median age 81 [interquartile range 74-86] years, 57.6% women, left ventricular ejection fraction 45% [32%-60%]), ultrasound-based muscle assessments were completed in 606 patients. Interobserver reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.84-0.99). Median muscle thicknesses at rest and during contraction were: diaphragm 1.9 (1.6-2.3) mm and 2.9 (2.3-3.8) mm; biceps 19.6 (15.9-23.1) mm and 25.3 (21.3-29.5) mm; quadriceps 19.0 (15.0-23.5) mm and 24.8 (19.9-29.5) mm; rectus femoris 9.7 (7.1-12.3) mm and 12.1 (9.6-15.0) mm. The median follow-up time was 733.5 (438-882) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SONIC-HF registry will provide valuable insights into the feasibility and prognostic implications of ultrasound-based muscle assessment in geriatric patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"552-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Skeletal muscle mass and function are crucial for assessing physical frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia, which significantly impact the prognosis of geriatric patients with heart failure (HF). Ultrasound-based assessment of skeletal muscles offers a non-invasive, real-time alternative to traditional methods. The compariSON of various methods In evaluatIon of sarCopenia in patients with Heart Failure study (SONIC-HF) aimed to evaluate the feasibility and prognostic impact of ultrasound-based muscle assessment in geriatric patients with HF.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled patients with HF aged ≥65 years who could ambulate independently at discharge. Certified observers assessed muscle thickness (biceps, quadriceps, rectus femoris, and diaphragm) using ultrasound at rest and during contraction. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits, and cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality.

Results: Of the 692 enrolled patients (median age 81 [interquartile range 74-86] years, 57.6% women, left ventricular ejection fraction 45% [32%-60%]), ultrasound-based muscle assessments were completed in 606 patients. Interobserver reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.84-0.99). Median muscle thicknesses at rest and during contraction were: diaphragm 1.9 (1.6-2.3) mm and 2.9 (2.3-3.8) mm; biceps 19.6 (15.9-23.1) mm and 25.3 (21.3-29.5) mm; quadriceps 19.0 (15.0-23.5) mm and 24.8 (19.9-29.5) mm; rectus femoris 9.7 (7.1-12.3) mm and 12.1 (9.6-15.0) mm. The median follow-up time was 733.5 (438-882) days.

Conclusions: The SONIC-HF registry will provide valuable insights into the feasibility and prognostic implications of ultrasound-based muscle assessment in geriatric patients with HF.

SONIC-HF多中心注册表的设计、合理性和基线特征。
骨骼肌质量和功能是评估身体虚弱、肌肉减少和恶病质的关键,这对老年心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后有显著影响。基于超声的骨骼肌评估提供了一种非侵入性的、实时的替代传统方法。各种评估心力衰竭患者肌肉减少的方法比较研究(SONIC-HF)旨在评估基于超声的老年心力衰竭患者肌肉评估的可行性及其对预后的影响。方法:这项多中心前瞻性队列研究纳入了年龄≥65岁、出院时能独立行走的心衰患者。经认证的观察员在静止和收缩时使用超声评估肌肉厚度(二头肌、股四头肌、股直肌和膈肌)。主要终点是全因死亡率。次要终点包括心衰住院、计划外医院就诊、心血管和非心血管死亡率。结果:在692例入组患者中(中位年龄81岁[四分位间距74-86岁],57.6%为女性,左心室射血分数45%[32%-60%]),606例患者完成了基于超声的肌肉评估。观察者间信度极好(类内相关系数0.84-0.99)。静止和收缩时膈肌中肌厚度分别为1.9 (1.6-2.3)mm和2.9 (2.3-3.8)mm;二头肌19.6 (15.9-23.1)mm和25.3 (21.3-29.5)mm;股四头肌19.0 (15.0-23.5)mm和24.8 (19.9-29.5)mm;股骨直肌9.7 (7.1-12.3)mm和12.1 (9.6-15.0)mm。中位随访时间为733.5(438-882)天。结论:SONIC-HF登记将为基于超声的老年心衰患者肌肉评估的可行性和预后意义提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信