Combining Rule-based NLP-lite with Rapid Iterative Chart Adjudication for Creation of a Large, Accurately Curated Cohort from EHR data: A Case Study in the Context of a Clinical Trial Emulation.
Pradeep Mutalik, Kei-Hoi Cheung, Jennifer Green, Melissa Buelt-Gebhardt, Karen F Anderson, Vales Jeanpaul, Linda McDonald, Michael Wininger, Yuli Li, Nallakkandi Rajeevan, Peter M Jessel, Hans Moore, Selçuk Adabag, Merritt H Raitt, Mihaela Aslan
{"title":"Combining Rule-based NLP-lite with Rapid Iterative Chart Adjudication for Creation of a Large, Accurately Curated Cohort from EHR data: A Case Study in the Context of a Clinical Trial Emulation.","authors":"Pradeep Mutalik, Kei-Hoi Cheung, Jennifer Green, Melissa Buelt-Gebhardt, Karen F Anderson, Vales Jeanpaul, Linda McDonald, Michael Wininger, Yuli Li, Nallakkandi Rajeevan, Peter M Jessel, Hans Moore, Selçuk Adabag, Merritt H Raitt, Mihaela Aslan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this work was to create a gold-standard curated cohort of 10,000+ cases from the Veteran Affairs (VA) corporate data warehouse (CDW) for virtual emulation of a randomized clinical trial (CSP#592). The trial had six inclusion/exclusion criteria lacking adequate structured data. We therefore used a hybrid computer/human approach to extract information from clinical notes. Rule-based NLP output was iteratively adjudicated by a panel of trained non-clinician content experts and non-experts using an easy-to-use spreadsheet-based rapid adjudication display. This group-adjudication process iteratively sharpened both the computer algorithm and clinical decision criteria, while simultaneously training the non-experts. The cohort was successfully created with each inclusion/exclusion decision backed by a source document. Less than 0.5% of cases required referral to specialist clinicians. It is likely that such curated datasets capturing specialist reasoning and using a process-supervised approach will acquire greater importance as training tools for future clinical AI applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"847-856"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this work was to create a gold-standard curated cohort of 10,000+ cases from the Veteran Affairs (VA) corporate data warehouse (CDW) for virtual emulation of a randomized clinical trial (CSP#592). The trial had six inclusion/exclusion criteria lacking adequate structured data. We therefore used a hybrid computer/human approach to extract information from clinical notes. Rule-based NLP output was iteratively adjudicated by a panel of trained non-clinician content experts and non-experts using an easy-to-use spreadsheet-based rapid adjudication display. This group-adjudication process iteratively sharpened both the computer algorithm and clinical decision criteria, while simultaneously training the non-experts. The cohort was successfully created with each inclusion/exclusion decision backed by a source document. Less than 0.5% of cases required referral to specialist clinicians. It is likely that such curated datasets capturing specialist reasoning and using a process-supervised approach will acquire greater importance as training tools for future clinical AI applications.