Influence of Patellar Implant Shape on Patellofemoral Contact Pressure Using Finite Element Analysis.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hun Sik Cho, Hyoung-Taek Hong, Hyuck Min Kwon, Yong-Gon Koh, Seong-Mun Hwang, Kwan Kyu Park, Kyoung-Tak Kang
{"title":"Influence of Patellar Implant Shape on Patellofemoral Contact Pressure Using Finite Element Analysis.","authors":"Hun Sik Cho, Hyoung-Taek Hong, Hyuck Min Kwon, Yong-Gon Koh, Seong-Mun Hwang, Kwan Kyu Park, Kyoung-Tak Kang","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study focused on analyzing the contact pressure and area on different patellar component designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to evaluate biomechanics related to the patellofemoral (PF) joint.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patellar components studied included the dome design, modified dome design, and anatomical design implants. Using finite element analysis and mechanical testing, the pressure and area were evaluated. The first loading condition was simulated at flexion angles of 0°, 15°, 45°, 90°, 120°, and 150°. The second loading condition was simulated for a clinically relevant scenario, involving a 2-mm medial shift at a flexion angle of 45°.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both the modified dome and anatomical designs, the contact area and pressure increased with the flexion angle. The dome design reached its maximum contact area at a flexion angle of 120°. Among the designs, the anatomical design had the largest contact area and a lower contact pressure compared to the dome and modified dome designs. However, when a medial shift of 2 mm was simulated at a 45° flexion angle, which can occur clinically, the anatomical design showed edge contact, leading to higher contact pressure and reduced contact area. In contrast, the modified dome design demonstrated the lowest contact pressure and the greatest contact area under the same shifted conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the design of the patellar component significantly affects patellar biomechanics and stability. Specifically, the modified dome design showed improved biomechanical effects in clinically relevant scenarios. Therefore, patellar components with a modified dome design are expected to better manage PF joint pain and reduce complications in TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 6","pages":"383-389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study focused on analyzing the contact pressure and area on different patellar component designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to evaluate biomechanics related to the patellofemoral (PF) joint.

Materials and methods: The patellar components studied included the dome design, modified dome design, and anatomical design implants. Using finite element analysis and mechanical testing, the pressure and area were evaluated. The first loading condition was simulated at flexion angles of 0°, 15°, 45°, 90°, 120°, and 150°. The second loading condition was simulated for a clinically relevant scenario, involving a 2-mm medial shift at a flexion angle of 45°.

Results: For both the modified dome and anatomical designs, the contact area and pressure increased with the flexion angle. The dome design reached its maximum contact area at a flexion angle of 120°. Among the designs, the anatomical design had the largest contact area and a lower contact pressure compared to the dome and modified dome designs. However, when a medial shift of 2 mm was simulated at a 45° flexion angle, which can occur clinically, the anatomical design showed edge contact, leading to higher contact pressure and reduced contact area. In contrast, the modified dome design demonstrated the lowest contact pressure and the greatest contact area under the same shifted conditions.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the design of the patellar component significantly affects patellar biomechanics and stability. Specifically, the modified dome design showed improved biomechanical effects in clinically relevant scenarios. Therefore, patellar components with a modified dome design are expected to better manage PF joint pain and reduce complications in TKA.

髌骨植入物形状对髌股接触压力影响的有限元分析。
目的:分析全膝关节置换术(TKA)中不同髌骨假体设计的接触压力和面积,以评估髌骨股骨(PF)关节的生物力学。材料和方法:研究的髌骨假体包括穹窿设计、改良穹窿设计和解剖设计。通过有限元分析和力学测试,对压力和面积进行了评估。第一种加载条件分别为0°、15°、45°、90°、120°和150°弯曲角。第二种加载条件是模拟临床相关场景,包括2毫米的内侧移位,弯曲角度为45°。结果:无论是改良型穹顶还是解剖型穹顶,接触面积和压力都随屈曲角度的增加而增加。穹顶设计在弯曲角度为120°时达到最大接触面积。在所有设计中,解剖设计的接触面积最大,接触压力较穹顶设计和改良穹顶设计低。然而,当以45°屈曲角模拟2 mm的内侧移位时(临床上可能发生),解剖设计显示边缘接触,导致接触压力更高,接触面积减少。相反,在相同位移条件下,改进的圆顶设计显示出最小的接触压力和最大的接触面积。结论:髌骨假体的设计显著影响髌骨的生物力学和稳定性。具体而言,改进的穹顶设计在临床相关情况下显示出更好的生物力学效果。因此,改良圆顶设计的髌骨假体有望更好地控制PF关节疼痛并减少TKA的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信