Implementation of electronic distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications by the Danish Medicines Agency: a survey study of physicians' experiences and preferences.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986251333911
Per Sindahl, Mathias Møllebæk, Helga Gardarsdottir, Marie Louise De Bruin, Christine Erikstrup Hallgreen, Marianne Hald Clemmensen
{"title":"Implementation of electronic distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications by the Danish Medicines Agency: a survey study of physicians' experiences and preferences.","authors":"Per Sindahl, Mathias Møllebæk, Helga Gardarsdottir, Marie Louise De Bruin, Christine Erikstrup Hallgreen, Marianne Hald Clemmensen","doi":"10.1177/20420986251333911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficient distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) is crucial for ensuring healthcare providers promptly receive important new safety information.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the electronic distribution of DHPCs by the Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA) and to assess how future safety communication can be improved.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey among Danish physicians using a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DKMA sends DHPCs to healthcare professionals via an electronic mailbox called e-Boks which is linked to the unique personal identifier. To evaluate DKMA's distribution of DHPCs, participants were asked about awareness, frequency and barriers of reading, preferred distribution channel and overall satisfaction. To further identify potential improvements, respondents were asked about general preferences regarding sender and channels of safety information in addition to which information sources they use to keep up-to-date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2238 physicians completed the survey corresponding to a response rate of 26% based on the total target population. The total awareness was 81%. Compared to previous research, awareness of GPs increased from 66% to 82%, and the percentage of GPs who rarely or never read DHPCs decreased from 33% to 20%. In addition, our study revealed a preference for receiving DHPCs electronically through e-Boks as opposed to workplace-delivered postal letters, and a preference for the DKMA over pharmaceutical companies as the sender of DHPCs. One-third of the respondents were either 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' with the current solution. A professional mailbox and point-of-care alerts when prescribing may complement the primary distribution channel to strengthen the uptake. Additionally, existing information sources already frequented by the target group may be used to communicate safety information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DKMA's electronic distribution of DHPCs suggests an improvement and may serve as inspiration for other agencies. However, the considerable dissatisfaction calls for further improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251333911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251333911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficient distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) is crucial for ensuring healthcare providers promptly receive important new safety information.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the electronic distribution of DHPCs by the Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA) and to assess how future safety communication can be improved.

Design: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey among Danish physicians using a self-administered questionnaire.

Methods: DKMA sends DHPCs to healthcare professionals via an electronic mailbox called e-Boks which is linked to the unique personal identifier. To evaluate DKMA's distribution of DHPCs, participants were asked about awareness, frequency and barriers of reading, preferred distribution channel and overall satisfaction. To further identify potential improvements, respondents were asked about general preferences regarding sender and channels of safety information in addition to which information sources they use to keep up-to-date.

Results: A total of 2238 physicians completed the survey corresponding to a response rate of 26% based on the total target population. The total awareness was 81%. Compared to previous research, awareness of GPs increased from 66% to 82%, and the percentage of GPs who rarely or never read DHPCs decreased from 33% to 20%. In addition, our study revealed a preference for receiving DHPCs electronically through e-Boks as opposed to workplace-delivered postal letters, and a preference for the DKMA over pharmaceutical companies as the sender of DHPCs. One-third of the respondents were either 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' with the current solution. A professional mailbox and point-of-care alerts when prescribing may complement the primary distribution channel to strengthen the uptake. Additionally, existing information sources already frequented by the target group may be used to communicate safety information.

Conclusion: The DKMA's electronic distribution of DHPCs suggests an improvement and may serve as inspiration for other agencies. However, the considerable dissatisfaction calls for further improvements.

丹麦药品管理局实施直接医疗保健专业通讯的电子分发:一项关于医生经验和偏好的调查研究。
背景:直接医疗保健专业通信(dhpc)的有效分发对于确保医疗保健提供者及时接收重要的新安全信息至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估丹麦药品管理局(DKMA)对dhpc电子分发的实施情况,并评估如何改进未来的安全沟通。设计:我们在丹麦医生中进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查,使用了一份自我管理的问卷。方法:DKMA通过一个名为e- books的电子邮箱将dhpc发送给医疗保健专业人员,该电子邮箱与唯一个人标识符相关联。为了评估DKMA对dhpc的分发情况,参与者被问及对dhpc的认识、阅读频率和障碍、首选分发渠道和总体满意度。为了进一步确定潜在的改进,受访者被问及关于发送者和安全信息渠道的一般偏好,以及他们使用哪些信息来源来保持最新。结果:共有2238名医生完成了调查,以总目标人群为基础的应答率为26%。总知晓率为81%。与之前的研究相比,全科医生的认知度从66%增加到82%,很少或从不阅读dhpc的全科医生比例从33%下降到20%。此外,我们的研究显示,人们更倾向于通过电子书接收dhpc,而不是通过工作场所邮寄信件,并且DKMA比制药公司更倾向于作为dhpc的发送者。三分之一的受访者对目前的解决方案“不满意”或“非常不满意”。专业邮箱和处方时的护理点警报可以补充主要分销渠道,以加强吸收。此外,目标群体经常使用的现有信息源可用于交流安全信息。结论:DKMA对DHPCs的电子分发进行了改进,可为其他机构提供借鉴。然而,相当大的不满要求进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信