Durable Shoulder Pain Relief and Avoidance of Surgery Up To 5 Years Following 60-Day PNS Treatment.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kevin E Vorenkamp, Gemayel Lee, Denise D Lester, Chaitanya Konda, Steven P Cohen, Nate D Crosby, Joseph W Boggs
{"title":"Durable Shoulder Pain Relief and Avoidance of Surgery Up To 5 Years Following 60-Day PNS Treatment.","authors":"Kevin E Vorenkamp, Gemayel Lee, Denise D Lester, Chaitanya Konda, Steven P Cohen, Nate D Crosby, Joseph W Boggs","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00746-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shoulder pain can be a chronic, disabling condition resulting in major procedures like surgery that are invasive, costly, and pose significant risks to patients. Minimally invasive interventions that provide durable relief can improve outcomes while enabling patients to avoid accruing additional healthcare costs. The present survey study evaluated durability of pain relief in a real-world shoulder pain population following percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional follow-up survey assessed follow-up outcomes among patients who received 60-day PNS for chronic shoulder pain. Outcomes included patient-reported percent pain relief, average and worst pain scores, and patient impression of change in quality of life, physical function, and sleep. Patients also reported other treatments and interventions used for their shoulder pain since the 60-day PNS treatment including changes in medication usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 489 survey participants (mean follow-up 21 months, range 6-60), 83% (405/489) reported no subsequent radiofrequency ablation, permanent implant, or surgery following 60-day PNS. Within this subset, 87% reported ongoing improvement in at least one domain at follow-up, including 71% who maintained ≥ 50% pain relief, and more than half who reported much or very much improved quality of life (61%), physical function (57%), or sleep (57%). Among those using PNS seeking to avoid surgery (n = 265), 81% reported no subsequent surgery, with 77% of those patients maintaining ≥ 50% pain relief. Outcomes were consistent across follow-up durations and shoulder pain etiologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world evidence demonstrates that a large majority of responders to 60-day PNS may experience durable shoulder pain relief and other improvements, with benefits demonstrated up to 5 years post treatment. The low rate of progression to subsequent interventions including surgery suggests potential for healthcare economic benefit, supporting 60-day PNS as both a clinically effective and potentially economically advantageous approach for appropriate patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00746-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder pain can be a chronic, disabling condition resulting in major procedures like surgery that are invasive, costly, and pose significant risks to patients. Minimally invasive interventions that provide durable relief can improve outcomes while enabling patients to avoid accruing additional healthcare costs. The present survey study evaluated durability of pain relief in a real-world shoulder pain population following percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment.

Methods: A cross-sectional follow-up survey assessed follow-up outcomes among patients who received 60-day PNS for chronic shoulder pain. Outcomes included patient-reported percent pain relief, average and worst pain scores, and patient impression of change in quality of life, physical function, and sleep. Patients also reported other treatments and interventions used for their shoulder pain since the 60-day PNS treatment including changes in medication usage.

Results: Among 489 survey participants (mean follow-up 21 months, range 6-60), 83% (405/489) reported no subsequent radiofrequency ablation, permanent implant, or surgery following 60-day PNS. Within this subset, 87% reported ongoing improvement in at least one domain at follow-up, including 71% who maintained ≥ 50% pain relief, and more than half who reported much or very much improved quality of life (61%), physical function (57%), or sleep (57%). Among those using PNS seeking to avoid surgery (n = 265), 81% reported no subsequent surgery, with 77% of those patients maintaining ≥ 50% pain relief. Outcomes were consistent across follow-up durations and shoulder pain etiologies.

Conclusions: This real-world evidence demonstrates that a large majority of responders to 60-day PNS may experience durable shoulder pain relief and other improvements, with benefits demonstrated up to 5 years post treatment. The low rate of progression to subsequent interventions including surgery suggests potential for healthcare economic benefit, supporting 60-day PNS as both a clinically effective and potentially economically advantageous approach for appropriate patients.

60天PNS治疗后长达5年的持久肩部疼痛缓解和避免手术。
简介:肩部疼痛可能是一种慢性致残疾病,导致像手术这样的重大手术是侵入性的,昂贵的,并且对患者构成重大风险。提供持久缓解的微创干预可以改善结果,同时使患者避免产生额外的医疗费用。目前的调查研究评估了现实世界中肩痛人群在经皮60天外周神经刺激(PNS)治疗后疼痛缓解的持久性。方法:一项横断面随访调查评估了接受60天PNS治疗慢性肩痛患者的随访结果。结果包括患者报告的疼痛缓解百分比、平均和最差疼痛评分、患者对生活质量、身体功能和睡眠变化的印象。患者还报告了自60天PNS治疗以来用于肩部疼痛的其他治疗和干预措施,包括药物使用的变化。结果:在489名调查参与者中(平均随访21个月,范围6-60),83%(405/489)报告在60天PNS后没有后续射频消融、永久植入或手术。在这个子集中,87%的患者报告在随访中至少有一个领域持续改善,其中71%的患者保持≥50%的疼痛缓解,超过一半的患者报告生活质量(61%)、身体功能(57%)或睡眠(57%)得到很大或非常大的改善。在使用PNS寻求避免手术的患者中(n = 265), 81%的患者报告没有后续手术,其中77%的患者保持≥50%的疼痛缓解。结果在随访时间和肩部疼痛病因方面是一致的。结论:这一真实世界的证据表明,大多数对60天PNS有反应的患者可能会经历持久的肩部疼痛缓解和其他改善,并且在治疗后5年仍有益处。包括手术在内的后续干预措施的低进展率表明潜在的医疗经济效益,支持60天PNS作为临床有效和潜在经济上有利的合适患者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信