Biomarkers of functional movement disorders - a systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna Dunalska, Kamila Saramak, Katarzyna Śmiłowska, Vanessa Carvalho, Rachael Nicholls, Ali Abusrair, Jaroslaw Slawek, Simon Schmitt, Carolin Klages, Kirsten R Müller-Vahl, Natalia Szejko
{"title":"Biomarkers of functional movement disorders - a systematic review.","authors":"Anna Dunalska, Kamila Saramak, Katarzyna Śmiłowska, Vanessa Carvalho, Rachael Nicholls, Ali Abusrair, Jaroslaw Slawek, Simon Schmitt, Carolin Klages, Kirsten R Müller-Vahl, Natalia Szejko","doi":"10.5603/pjnns.103052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Functional movement disorders (FMD) are defined by diverse phenotypes of altered movements that lack corresponding pathology in an anatomical region, and are typically characterized by inconsistent findings on neurological examination.</p><p><strong>State of the art: </strong>While there are several suggestive clinical features indicating FMD, objective biomarkers are still lacking. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with an emphasis on literature published after February 2019 aiming to summarise current knowledge on biomarkers of FMD. We divided our findings into four main categories: genetic, biofluid, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological biomarkers. For the differential diagnosis of functional tremor, functional tic-like behaviours (FTLB), and functional myoclonus, previous studies support the use of electrophysiological biomarkers. Evidence from neuroimaging research supports the multi-network model of FMD as a condition affecting the attentional, sensorimotor, self-agency/multimodal integration, and limbic/salience circuits. Biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain, inflammatory, and autoimmune factors should still be considered experimental, since results are based on small sample sizes. There is preliminary evidence from a genetic study that in FMD there is a complex interaction between individual predisposing risk genes involved in the serotonergic pathway.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Although the diagnosis of FMD remains challenging, and depends mainly on clinical judgement, research is underway to identify potential biomarkers to improve diagnostic confidence. Previous studies indicate that, in addition to psychological symptoms, biological changes can be detected in patients with FMD. This is evidenced by different patterns of neurotransmission related to stress responses and emotional regulation.</p><p><strong>Future directions: </strong>We believe it is vital to conduct larger trials in diverse populations from different regions of the world in order to find more reliable biomarkers of FMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19132,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pjnns.103052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Functional movement disorders (FMD) are defined by diverse phenotypes of altered movements that lack corresponding pathology in an anatomical region, and are typically characterized by inconsistent findings on neurological examination.

State of the art: While there are several suggestive clinical features indicating FMD, objective biomarkers are still lacking. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with an emphasis on literature published after February 2019 aiming to summarise current knowledge on biomarkers of FMD. We divided our findings into four main categories: genetic, biofluid, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological biomarkers. For the differential diagnosis of functional tremor, functional tic-like behaviours (FTLB), and functional myoclonus, previous studies support the use of electrophysiological biomarkers. Evidence from neuroimaging research supports the multi-network model of FMD as a condition affecting the attentional, sensorimotor, self-agency/multimodal integration, and limbic/salience circuits. Biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain, inflammatory, and autoimmune factors should still be considered experimental, since results are based on small sample sizes. There is preliminary evidence from a genetic study that in FMD there is a complex interaction between individual predisposing risk genes involved in the serotonergic pathway.

Clinical implications: Although the diagnosis of FMD remains challenging, and depends mainly on clinical judgement, research is underway to identify potential biomarkers to improve diagnostic confidence. Previous studies indicate that, in addition to psychological symptoms, biological changes can be detected in patients with FMD. This is evidenced by different patterns of neurotransmission related to stress responses and emotional regulation.

Future directions: We believe it is vital to conduct larger trials in diverse populations from different regions of the world in order to find more reliable biomarkers of FMD.

功能性运动障碍的生物标志物——系统综述。
功能性运动障碍(FMD)是指在解剖区域缺乏相应病理的运动改变的不同表型,通常以神经学检查结果不一致为特征。现状:虽然有一些提示口蹄疫的临床特征,但仍然缺乏客观的生物标志物。我们对文献进行了系统综述,重点是2019年2月以后发表的文献,旨在总结口蹄疫生物标志物的当前知识。我们将我们的发现分为四大类:遗传、生物流体、神经成像和电生理生物标志物。对于功能性震颤、功能性抽搐样行为(FTLB)和功能性肌阵挛的鉴别诊断,先前的研究支持使用电生理生物标志物。来自神经影像学研究的证据支持口蹄疫的多网络模型,认为口蹄疫是一种影响注意力、感觉运动、自我代理/多模式整合和边缘/突出回路的疾病。生物标志物如神经丝轻链、炎症和自身免疫因子仍应被认为是实验性的,因为结果是基于小样本量。一项遗传学研究的初步证据表明,在口蹄疫中,涉及血清素能途径的个体易感风险基因之间存在复杂的相互作用。临床意义:尽管口蹄疫的诊断仍然具有挑战性,主要取决于临床判断,但研究正在进行中,以确定潜在的生物标志物,以提高诊断的信心。以往的研究表明,口蹄疫患者除了心理症状外,还可以检测到生物学变化。与压力反应和情绪调节相关的不同神经传递模式证明了这一点。未来方向:我们认为,为了找到更可靠的口蹄疫生物标志物,在世界不同地区的不同人群中进行更大规模的试验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
27.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery is an official journal of the Polish Society of Neurology and the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, aimed at publishing high quality articles within the field of clinical neurology and neurosurgery, as well as related subspecialties. For more than a century, the journal has been providing its authors and readers with the opportunity to report, discuss, and share the issues important for every-day practice and research advances in the fields related to neurology and neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信