Manuel R De Jesus Escano, Emily A Vertosick, Neeta D'Souza, Nicole Benfante, Andrew T Lenis, Peter A Reisz, Christopher Gaffney, Alvin Goh, Timothy F Donahue, Eugene Cha, S Machele Donat, Harry W Herr, Guido Dalbagni, Dean Bajorin, Judy Sarungbam, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Bernard H Bochner, Daniel D Sjoberg, Eugene J Pietzak
{"title":"Re-analysis of intravesical gemcitabine in the era of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Manuel R De Jesus Escano, Emily A Vertosick, Neeta D'Souza, Nicole Benfante, Andrew T Lenis, Peter A Reisz, Christopher Gaffney, Alvin Goh, Timothy F Donahue, Eugene Cha, S Machele Donat, Harry W Herr, Guido Dalbagni, Dean Bajorin, Judy Sarungbam, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Bernard H Bochner, Daniel D Sjoberg, Eugene J Pietzak","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Uncertainty exits over the best treatments for patients whom Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has failed. We aim to contextualize novel therapies approved based on single-arm, nonrandomized trials and those supported only by retrospective data by re-analyzing oncologic outcomes achieved with intravesical gemcitabine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who were treated for BCG failure with single agent intravesical gemcitabine at our institution were analyzed to compare clinical outcomes (high-grade recurrence/progression) across different BCG failure definitions. Associations between clinicopathologic variables with outcomes after gemcitabine were estimated using Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 127 patients, 57% met the historical definition of BCG-refractory NMIBC and 33% met BCG-unresponsive criteria using a 12-month cut-off. Twelve-month recurrence-free survival was similar between BCG-refractory (47%; 95% CI: 36%, 60%) and BCG-unresponsive (52%; 95% CI: 38%, 71%) definitions. BCG-unresponsive patients who received gemcitabine in a clinical trial had significantly worse recurrence-free survival compared to those receiving the same treatment outside a trial (12-month recurrence-free survival difference: 41%; P = 0.02). A positive pretreatment urine cytology was associated with increased risk of recurrence (P = 0.005) and progression (P = 0.002) and may better indicate minimal residual disease than carcinoma in-situ on pretreatment biopsies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data raise concern over US Food and Drug Administration approval based on single-arm, nonrandomized trials using expert-based BCG-unresponsive criteria and for the use of combination gemcitabine-docetaxel as a de facto standard treatment based on retrospective data alone. Improved assessments of minimal residual disease, such as pretreatment urinary cytology, are needed to improve risk stratification in NMIBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.04.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Uncertainty exits over the best treatments for patients whom Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has failed. We aim to contextualize novel therapies approved based on single-arm, nonrandomized trials and those supported only by retrospective data by re-analyzing oncologic outcomes achieved with intravesical gemcitabine.
Materials and methods: Patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who were treated for BCG failure with single agent intravesical gemcitabine at our institution were analyzed to compare clinical outcomes (high-grade recurrence/progression) across different BCG failure definitions. Associations between clinicopathologic variables with outcomes after gemcitabine were estimated using Cox models.
Results: Of the 127 patients, 57% met the historical definition of BCG-refractory NMIBC and 33% met BCG-unresponsive criteria using a 12-month cut-off. Twelve-month recurrence-free survival was similar between BCG-refractory (47%; 95% CI: 36%, 60%) and BCG-unresponsive (52%; 95% CI: 38%, 71%) definitions. BCG-unresponsive patients who received gemcitabine in a clinical trial had significantly worse recurrence-free survival compared to those receiving the same treatment outside a trial (12-month recurrence-free survival difference: 41%; P = 0.02). A positive pretreatment urine cytology was associated with increased risk of recurrence (P = 0.005) and progression (P = 0.002) and may better indicate minimal residual disease than carcinoma in-situ on pretreatment biopsies.
Conclusions: Our data raise concern over US Food and Drug Administration approval based on single-arm, nonrandomized trials using expert-based BCG-unresponsive criteria and for the use of combination gemcitabine-docetaxel as a de facto standard treatment based on retrospective data alone. Improved assessments of minimal residual disease, such as pretreatment urinary cytology, are needed to improve risk stratification in NMIBC.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.