Planned oocyte cryopreservation in Hong Kong: a potential prototype for mainland China.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olivia My Ngan, Ernest Hy Ng, Yumeng Yue, Raymond Hw Li
{"title":"Planned oocyte cryopreservation in Hong Kong: a potential prototype for mainland China.","authors":"Olivia My Ngan, Ernest Hy Ng, Yumeng Yue, Raymond Hw Li","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2485547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advent of planned oocyte cryopreservation (planned OC) represents a pivotal transition from reactive infertility treatments to proactive fertility preservation, providing a contemporary solution for women aiming to synchronise their career aspirations with future fertility plans. While numerous developed Western nations have liberalised access to planned OC for diverse individuals, including opposite-sex married couples, same-sex married couples, and unmarried individuals, mainland China maintains stringent prohibitions, permitting it solely for medical reasons, due to medical, cultural, and ethical considerations. In contrast, Hong Kong, a major urban city in China, has adopted a more permissive approach, allowing access to planned OC for non-medical reasons among unmarried individuals. This article will delve into the evolving landscape of public attitudes, fertility-seeking behaviour, and regulatory governance in Hong Kong. It will reflect on the practices and challenges associated with implementing a more permissive policy on planned OC, aiming to extract valuable lessons for the broader Chinese context.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"33 1","pages":"2485547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2485547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of planned oocyte cryopreservation (planned OC) represents a pivotal transition from reactive infertility treatments to proactive fertility preservation, providing a contemporary solution for women aiming to synchronise their career aspirations with future fertility plans. While numerous developed Western nations have liberalised access to planned OC for diverse individuals, including opposite-sex married couples, same-sex married couples, and unmarried individuals, mainland China maintains stringent prohibitions, permitting it solely for medical reasons, due to medical, cultural, and ethical considerations. In contrast, Hong Kong, a major urban city in China, has adopted a more permissive approach, allowing access to planned OC for non-medical reasons among unmarried individuals. This article will delve into the evolving landscape of public attitudes, fertility-seeking behaviour, and regulatory governance in Hong Kong. It will reflect on the practices and challenges associated with implementing a more permissive policy on planned OC, aiming to extract valuable lessons for the broader Chinese context.

香港计划中的卵母细胞冷冻保存:中国大陆的潜在原型。
计划性卵母细胞冷冻保存(计划性OC)的出现代表了从被动不孕症治疗到主动生育保护的关键转变,为旨在将其职业抱负与未来生育计划同步的女性提供了当代解决方案。虽然许多发达的西方国家已经放开了对不同个体(包括异性已婚夫妇、同性已婚夫妇和未婚个人)的计划性婚姻,但中国大陆仍然严格禁止,仅出于医疗原因,出于医疗、文化和伦理方面的考虑,允许它。相比之下,中国的主要城市香港采取了更为宽松的做法,允许未婚人士因非医疗原因参加计划中的组织形式。本文将深入探讨香港公众态度、寻求生育行为和规管管治的演变。它将反思在实施更宽松的计划法人政策时的实践和挑战,旨在为更广泛的中国背景提取有价值的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信