Detection rates of multigene panel and exome testing in patients with previous negative BRCA1/2 results.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jewel L Wasson, Trinity N Sprague, Darcy L Thull, Maureen May, Kathleen E Vitale, Shenin A Sanoba, Alexander N Yatsenko, Daniel Bellissimo, Phuong L Mai
{"title":"Detection rates of multigene panel and exome testing in patients with previous negative BRCA1/2 results.","authors":"Jewel L Wasson, Trinity N Sprague, Darcy L Thull, Maureen May, Kathleen E Vitale, Shenin A Sanoba, Alexander N Yatsenko, Daniel Bellissimo, Phuong L Mai","doi":"10.1007/s10689-025-00471-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since panel genetic testing has become widely available, national guidelines recommend that individuals who previously underwent BRCA1/2-only testing should undergo updated testing to include other hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes. Our study assessed the yield of additional hereditary cancer predisposition testing in patients who previously underwent negative BRCA1/2 testing. Additionally, our study included a small pilot to evaluate whole exome sequencing in patients with a strong family history. Patients enrolled in a registry study who previously underwent negative BRCA1/2 testing were included and stratified into three categories based on personal and family cancer history-strongly suggestive, moderately suggestive, and possibly suggestive. Updated testing with a 36-gene pan-cancer panel was performed on most participants. A selected set of participants had whole exome sequencing. Patients with a pathogenic variant identified were offered clinical confirmatory testing. Rates of positive test results were compared among the three groups. Clinically relevant pathogenic variants in non-BRCA1/2 genes from the 36-gene panel test were identified in 8.1% of participants, most commonly in PALB2 (1.9%), ATM (1.2%), and MSH6 (1.2%). Positive findings were more common in patients with strongly suggestive history, but the differences were not statistically significant. Exome testing in individuals with a strongly suggestive personal and family history did not yield novel findings. Our findings aligned with previous studies and support the use of expanded gene panel testing in all patients meeting testing criteria who previously underwent negative BRCA1/2 testing. Our small pilot whole exome sequencing did not identify any novel finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-025-00471-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since panel genetic testing has become widely available, national guidelines recommend that individuals who previously underwent BRCA1/2-only testing should undergo updated testing to include other hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes. Our study assessed the yield of additional hereditary cancer predisposition testing in patients who previously underwent negative BRCA1/2 testing. Additionally, our study included a small pilot to evaluate whole exome sequencing in patients with a strong family history. Patients enrolled in a registry study who previously underwent negative BRCA1/2 testing were included and stratified into three categories based on personal and family cancer history-strongly suggestive, moderately suggestive, and possibly suggestive. Updated testing with a 36-gene pan-cancer panel was performed on most participants. A selected set of participants had whole exome sequencing. Patients with a pathogenic variant identified were offered clinical confirmatory testing. Rates of positive test results were compared among the three groups. Clinically relevant pathogenic variants in non-BRCA1/2 genes from the 36-gene panel test were identified in 8.1% of participants, most commonly in PALB2 (1.9%), ATM (1.2%), and MSH6 (1.2%). Positive findings were more common in patients with strongly suggestive history, but the differences were not statistically significant. Exome testing in individuals with a strongly suggestive personal and family history did not yield novel findings. Our findings aligned with previous studies and support the use of expanded gene panel testing in all patients meeting testing criteria who previously underwent negative BRCA1/2 testing. Our small pilot whole exome sequencing did not identify any novel finding.

既往BRCA1/2阴性患者的多基因面板和外显子组检测检出率
由于小组基因检测已经广泛使用,国家指南建议以前只进行brca1 /2检测的个体应该进行更新检测,包括其他遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性基因。我们的研究评估了先前接受BRCA1/2阴性检测的患者的额外遗传性癌症易感性检测的产量。此外,我们的研究还包括一个小型试点,以评估具有强烈家族史的患者的全外显子组测序。在一项登记研究中,先前接受BRCA1/2阴性检测的患者被纳入其中,并根据个人和家族癌症病史分为三类:强烈提示、中度提示和可能提示。对大多数参与者进行了36个基因泛癌症小组的最新测试。一组选定的参与者进行了全外显子组测序。鉴定出致病变异的患者接受临床确证试验。比较三组患者的阳性检出率。在36个基因面板测试中,8.1%的参与者发现了非brca1 /2基因的临床相关致病变异,最常见的是PALB2(1.9%)、ATM(1.2%)和MSH6(1.2%)。阳性结果在有强烈提示病史的患者中更为常见,但差异无统计学意义。外显子组测试在个人和家族史强烈暗示个体没有产生新的发现。我们的发现与之前的研究一致,支持在所有符合检测标准且之前接受BRCA1/2阴性检测的患者中使用扩展基因面板检测。我们的小型试点全外显子组测序没有发现任何新的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信