Bone SPECT/CT in the diagnosis and treatment decision making of axial pain.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marta Romera, Víctor Rodrigo-Paradells, Nicolás Varela, Edgar F Guillén, Marta Navarro-Astiasarán, Pablo Domínguez-Echavarri, Vicky Betech-Antar, Fernando Mínguez, Andrés Basanta, Juan J Rosales, Javier Arbizu
{"title":"Bone SPECT/CT in the diagnosis and treatment decision making of axial pain.","authors":"Marta Romera, Víctor Rodrigo-Paradells, Nicolás Varela, Edgar F Guillén, Marta Navarro-Astiasarán, Pablo Domínguez-Echavarri, Vicky Betech-Antar, Fernando Mínguez, Andrés Basanta, Juan J Rosales, Javier Arbizu","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08967-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the usefulness of bone SPECT/CT for providing additional information to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with axial pain, and for guiding the site of spinal injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 194 patients with axial pain evaluated with SPECT/CT and MRI. Imaging abnormalities were classified according to location and diagnosis of pain generators. Patient outcomes after SPECT/CT guided spinal injection were evaluated during clinical follow-up. Descriptive analyses and kappa coefficient were performed for facet joint arthropathy detection and degenerative disc disease between imaging modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI showed 44.3% more abnormalities than SPECT/CT (329 vs. 228). However, SPECT/CT detected 17% more patients with facet joint arthropathy compared to MRI (43.3% vs. 26.3% respectively). Imaging agreement for diagnosing degenerative disc disease was moderate (κ: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.56), but only fair for facet joint arthropathy (κ: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42). The response to spinal injections guided by SPECT/CT imaging was assessed in 56 patients with facet joint arthropathy. Among these, 26 /56 had a history of previous spinal injections guided by physical examination. In this group, the response was effective or partially effective in 65.4% of patients and ineffective in 34.6%. After a second injection guided by SPECT/CT, the response rate increased to 88.4%, with only 11.6% remaining ineffective, resulting in an absolute benefit of 23.4%. In 30/56 patients with no prior history of spinal injections, the therapy was effective or partially effective in 93.3%, while 6.7% did not show any improvement in pain after SPECT/CT-guided spinal injections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone SPECT/CT imaging complements MRI by providing valuable information to identify pain generators. In facet joint arthropathy, it improves the effectiveness of pain relief when used to guide spinal injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08967-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the usefulness of bone SPECT/CT for providing additional information to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with axial pain, and for guiding the site of spinal injections.

Methods: We studied 194 patients with axial pain evaluated with SPECT/CT and MRI. Imaging abnormalities were classified according to location and diagnosis of pain generators. Patient outcomes after SPECT/CT guided spinal injection were evaluated during clinical follow-up. Descriptive analyses and kappa coefficient were performed for facet joint arthropathy detection and degenerative disc disease between imaging modalities.

Results: MRI showed 44.3% more abnormalities than SPECT/CT (329 vs. 228). However, SPECT/CT detected 17% more patients with facet joint arthropathy compared to MRI (43.3% vs. 26.3% respectively). Imaging agreement for diagnosing degenerative disc disease was moderate (κ: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.56), but only fair for facet joint arthropathy (κ: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42). The response to spinal injections guided by SPECT/CT imaging was assessed in 56 patients with facet joint arthropathy. Among these, 26 /56 had a history of previous spinal injections guided by physical examination. In this group, the response was effective or partially effective in 65.4% of patients and ineffective in 34.6%. After a second injection guided by SPECT/CT, the response rate increased to 88.4%, with only 11.6% remaining ineffective, resulting in an absolute benefit of 23.4%. In 30/56 patients with no prior history of spinal injections, the therapy was effective or partially effective in 93.3%, while 6.7% did not show any improvement in pain after SPECT/CT-guided spinal injections.

Conclusion: Bone SPECT/CT imaging complements MRI by providing valuable information to identify pain generators. In facet joint arthropathy, it improves the effectiveness of pain relief when used to guide spinal injections.

骨SPECT/CT在轴性疼痛诊断及治疗决策中的应用。
目的:探讨骨SPECT/CT在轴向性疼痛患者中为磁共振成像(MRI)提供额外信息和指导脊柱注射部位的作用。方法:对194例轴性疼痛患者进行SPECT/CT和MRI评估。根据疼痛源的位置和诊断对影像学异常进行分类。在临床随访期间评估SPECT/CT引导下脊柱注射后的患者预后。描述性分析和kappa系数对小关节关节病的检测和椎间盘退变性疾病的成像方式之间进行。结果:MRI显示异常比SPECT/CT多44.3%(329比228)。然而,与MRI相比,SPECT/CT检测到的小关节病变患者多17%(分别为43.3%和26.3%)。诊断退行性椎间盘病变的影像学一致性中等(κ: 0.44;95% CI, 0.32-0.56),但仅适用于小关节关节病(κ: 0.35;95% ci, 0.28-0.42)。对56例小关节病变患者进行SPECT/CT引导下脊柱注射的疗效评估。其中26 /56有既往脊髓注射史,经体格检查。在该组中,65.4%的患者有效或部分有效,34.6%无效。在SPECT/CT引导下第二次注射后,有效率增加到88.4%,只有11.6%无效,绝对获益为23.4%。在30/56例无脊髓注射史的患者中,93.3%的患者治疗有效或部分有效,而6.7%的患者在SPECT/ ct引导下脊柱注射后疼痛没有任何改善。结论:骨SPECT/CT成像通过提供有价值的信息来识别疼痛的产生,是对MRI的补充。在小关节关节病中,当用于引导脊柱注射时,它可以提高疼痛缓解的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信