Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Short- Versus Standard-course Fluoroquinolone Treatment in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Double-blind Studies

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Salma Messous PhD , Achraf Rekik MD , Lynn Keraani MD , Rym Hamed MD , Marwa Toumia MD , Randa Dhaoui MD , Adel Sekma MD , Khaoula Bel Haj Ali MD , Sarra Sassi MD , Cyrine Kouraichi MD , Riadh Boukef MD , Wahid Bouida MD , Hamdi Boubaker MD , Mohamed Amine Msolli MD , Semir Nouira MD
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Short- Versus Standard-course Fluoroquinolone Treatment in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Double-blind Studies","authors":"Salma Messous PhD ,&nbsp;Achraf Rekik MD ,&nbsp;Lynn Keraani MD ,&nbsp;Rym Hamed MD ,&nbsp;Marwa Toumia MD ,&nbsp;Randa Dhaoui MD ,&nbsp;Adel Sekma MD ,&nbsp;Khaoula Bel Haj Ali MD ,&nbsp;Sarra Sassi MD ,&nbsp;Cyrine Kouraichi MD ,&nbsp;Riadh Boukef MD ,&nbsp;Wahid Bouida MD ,&nbsp;Hamdi Boubaker MD ,&nbsp;Mohamed Amine Msolli MD ,&nbsp;Semir Nouira MD","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.04.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine whether a short course (≤5 days) of fluoroquinolone treatment is as effective as a long course (7 days) in the treatment of patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were searched to 2021. Studies considered eligible for inclusion were randomized trials of antibiotic intervention involving adult patients &gt;18 years of age with a diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD, no antimicrobial at the time of the diagnosis and who received treatment with fluoroquinolones in 2 different course duration. The primary outcome analyzed was the clinical cure rate at early follow-up in an intention-to-treat.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Nine studies with a total of 3951 patients met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the study was high or very high with &gt;77% of the studies having a Jadad score of at least 4. At early (&lt;21 days) and late follow-up, there was no significant difference in clinical cure between the short course of fluoroquinolones therapy and the conventional course (odds ratio [OR] = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97–1.04; <em>P</em> = 0.82). Similar results were found for both antibiotic regimens regarding bacteriologic clearance (OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.75–1.22; <em>P</em> = 0.73). Short course was not inferior to the long course when using the same quinolone (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95–1.04; <em>P</em> = 0.73) and it had significantly reduced adverse effects (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64–0.89; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>A short course of fluoroquinolones proved to be as effective as and safer than conventional course in the treatment of patients diagnosed with acute exacerbation of COPD. Further research is encouraged to clarify the long-term outcomes in patients receiving short course of quinolones compared with the conventional course (NCT05380375).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 631-637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291825001638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine whether a short course (≤5 days) of fluoroquinolone treatment is as effective as a long course (7 days) in the treatment of patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were searched to 2021. Studies considered eligible for inclusion were randomized trials of antibiotic intervention involving adult patients >18 years of age with a diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD, no antimicrobial at the time of the diagnosis and who received treatment with fluoroquinolones in 2 different course duration. The primary outcome analyzed was the clinical cure rate at early follow-up in an intention-to-treat.

Findings

Nine studies with a total of 3951 patients met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the study was high or very high with >77% of the studies having a Jadad score of at least 4. At early (<21 days) and late follow-up, there was no significant difference in clinical cure between the short course of fluoroquinolones therapy and the conventional course (odds ratio [OR] = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97–1.04; P = 0.82). Similar results were found for both antibiotic regimens regarding bacteriologic clearance (OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.75–1.22; P = 0.73). Short course was not inferior to the long course when using the same quinolone (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95–1.04; P = 0.73) and it had significantly reduced adverse effects (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64–0.89; P < 0.05).

Implications

A short course of fluoroquinolones proved to be as effective as and safer than conventional course in the treatment of patients diagnosed with acute exacerbation of COPD. Further research is encouraged to clarify the long-term outcomes in patients receiving short course of quinolones compared with the conventional course (NCT05380375).
短疗程氟喹诺酮与标准疗程氟喹诺酮治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的疗效和安全性比较:双盲研究荟萃分析
目的:本荟萃分析的目的是确定短疗程(≤5天)氟喹诺酮治疗是否与长疗程(7天)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重患者同样有效。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane library和Web of Science至2021年。有资格纳入的研究是抗生素干预的随机试验,涉及年龄在bb0 - 18岁、诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重、诊断时没有抗微生物药物、在2个不同疗程中接受氟喹诺酮类药物治疗的成年患者。分析的主要结局是意向治疗的早期随访的临床治愈率。结果:9项研究共3951例患者符合纳入标准。研究的方法学质量很高或非常高,约77%的研究Jadad得分至少为4分。结论:短疗程的氟喹诺酮类药物在治疗慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重患者方面被证明与常规疗程一样有效且更安全。鼓励进一步的研究来阐明接受短疗程喹诺酮类药物与常规疗程(NCT05380375)患者的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信