Comparison between transtracheal and intravenous 2% lignocaine in attenuating hemodynamic stress response following direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Monotosh Pramanik, Uddalak Chattopadhyay, Shalini Chaudhuri, Syed Sadaqat Hussain, Nikhil Kumar Singh, Sandipan Banerjee, Shreyasi Ray, Jyotirmay Kirtania
{"title":"Comparison between transtracheal and intravenous 2% lignocaine in attenuating hemodynamic stress response following direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Monotosh Pramanik, Uddalak Chattopadhyay, Shalini Chaudhuri, Syed Sadaqat Hussain, Nikhil Kumar Singh, Sandipan Banerjee, Shreyasi Ray, Jyotirmay Kirtania","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03102-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Lignocaine is used through various routes to mitigate the hemodynamic surge associated with laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia. This study hypothesized that post-induction administration of transtracheal 2% lignocaine at 1.5 mg/kg would have a similar effect to intravenous 2% lignocaine at the same dosage, providing an alternative for attenuating the hemodynamic stress response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 138 consenting patients were randomized into two groups. Following induction, Group IV patients received 2% lignocaine at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group TT patients received 2% lignocaine at 1.5 mg/kg transtracheally. The primary outcome was the comparison of hemodynamic responses at different time points around intubation. The secondary outcome was the incidence of sore throat. Data analyses were done using the Statistical Software Jupyter Notebook, running in a Python 3.11 environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-induction hypotension was significantly less pronounced in the TT group [Mean blood pressure (median with IQR) IV group 68(60-78) mm of Hg vs. TT group 71(66-82.25) mm of Hg, P = 0.018]. TT group patients experienced a significantly smaller post-intubation surge at 3 minutes in blood pressure and heart rate compared to the IV group [Mean blood pressure (median with IQR) IV group 79(71-87) mm of Hg vs. TT group 73(65-81) mm of Hg, P = 0.009 and Heart rate (median with IQR) IV group 80(70-94) per minute vs. 71.5(64-82.75) per minute P = 0.015].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transtracheal lignocaine is more likely to maintain stable hemodynamics during intubation compared to intravenous lignocaine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2023/06/054125 [Registered on: 19/06/2023]. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php .</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03102-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Lignocaine is used through various routes to mitigate the hemodynamic surge associated with laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia. This study hypothesized that post-induction administration of transtracheal 2% lignocaine at 1.5 mg/kg would have a similar effect to intravenous 2% lignocaine at the same dosage, providing an alternative for attenuating the hemodynamic stress response.

Methods: A total of 138 consenting patients were randomized into two groups. Following induction, Group IV patients received 2% lignocaine at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group TT patients received 2% lignocaine at 1.5 mg/kg transtracheally. The primary outcome was the comparison of hemodynamic responses at different time points around intubation. The secondary outcome was the incidence of sore throat. Data analyses were done using the Statistical Software Jupyter Notebook, running in a Python 3.11 environment.

Results: Post-induction hypotension was significantly less pronounced in the TT group [Mean blood pressure (median with IQR) IV group 68(60-78) mm of Hg vs. TT group 71(66-82.25) mm of Hg, P = 0.018]. TT group patients experienced a significantly smaller post-intubation surge at 3 minutes in blood pressure and heart rate compared to the IV group [Mean blood pressure (median with IQR) IV group 79(71-87) mm of Hg vs. TT group 73(65-81) mm of Hg, P = 0.009 and Heart rate (median with IQR) IV group 80(70-94) per minute vs. 71.5(64-82.75) per minute P = 0.015].

Conclusion: Transtracheal lignocaine is more likely to maintain stable hemodynamics during intubation compared to intravenous lignocaine.

Trial registration: CTRI/2023/06/054125 [Registered on: 19/06/2023]. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php .

经气管和静脉注射2%利多卡因减轻直接喉镜和气管插管后血流动力学应激反应的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景和目的:利多卡因通过多种途径用于减轻全身麻醉时喉镜检查和气管插管相关的血流动力学激增。本研究假设诱导后经气管以1.5 mg/kg剂量给予2%利多卡因与相同剂量静脉注射2%利多卡因具有相似的效果,为减轻血流动力学应激反应提供了另一种选择。方法:138例患者随机分为两组。诱导后,IV组患者静脉注射2%的1.5 mg/kg剂量的利多卡因,TT组患者经气管注射2%的1.5 mg/kg剂量的利多卡因。主要结果是比较插管前后不同时间点的血流动力学反应。次要结果是喉咙痛的发生率。数据分析使用在Python 3.11环境下运行的统计软件Jupyter Notebook完成。结果:TT组诱导后低血压明显减轻[平均血压(IQR) IV组68(60-78)mm Hg vs TT组71(66-82.25)mm Hg, P = 0.018]。与IV组相比,TT组患者在插管后3分钟血压和心率的波动明显较小[平均血压(IQR中值)IV组79(71-87)mm Hg vs. TT组73(65-81)mm Hg, P = 0.009,心率(IQR中值)IV组80(70-94)/分钟vs. 71.5(64-82.75) /分钟P = 0.015]。结论:经气管利多卡因比静脉利多卡因更能维持插管期间血流动力学的稳定。试验注册:CTRI/2023/06/054125[注册日期:2023年6月19日]。该试验已在印度临床试验注册中心https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信