Standards of practice for peripheral nerve blocks at a tertiary care center in a low-middle income country- a prospective observational study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Heena Purshotamdas Bhupta, Priyanka Kini, Nisha Sara M Jacob
{"title":"Standards of practice for peripheral nerve blocks at a tertiary care center in a low-middle income country- a prospective observational study.","authors":"Heena Purshotamdas Bhupta, Priyanka Kini, Nisha Sara M Jacob","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03125-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have gained tremendous interest as a means of providing anesthesia and analgesia. Heterogeneity exists in the standards of practice (SoP) for PNB, especially in resource limited settings. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the SoP for administration of PNB at a tertiary care, University teaching hospital, in a low-middle income country (LMIC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study conducted between September 2021 and March 2023. The SoP were collected through either direct or indirect observation, using a self-developed proforma. Data were collected for various domains and were mapped to structure, process and outcome. They were then benchmarked to identify best practices and deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 PNBs were recorded, of which 196 (50.8%) were directly observed. Majority were administered to low-risk individuals without comorbidities (61.9%). In the structure metrics resuscitation equipment was available in 76% while availability of resuscitation drugs (29%) was identified as needing improvement. Individual components of process metrics such as intravenous access, use of personal protective equipment, ultrasound guided block technique and use of short bevel needles exceeded the 95% benchmark, while components such as monitoring (54%), aseptic site preparation (76.5%), the Stop Before You Block procedure (61.9%) and use of block additives (70.2%) fell short of the benchmark. Postoperative multimodal analgesia prescription (4.7%) was identified as needing improvement. Of the outcome metrics, while immediate post-block complications (0%) and conversion rate to general anesthesia (8.3%) exceeded the benchmark (< 10%), cumulative toxic dose was exceeded (36.6%) when a mixture of local anesthetics was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standards of practice for structure, process and outcome were partly achieved for PNB at this tertiary care center in a low-middle income country. Strategies to improve SoP have been proposed and will need to be evaluated in future quality improvement initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03125-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have gained tremendous interest as a means of providing anesthesia and analgesia. Heterogeneity exists in the standards of practice (SoP) for PNB, especially in resource limited settings. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the SoP for administration of PNB at a tertiary care, University teaching hospital, in a low-middle income country (LMIC).

Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted between September 2021 and March 2023. The SoP were collected through either direct or indirect observation, using a self-developed proforma. Data were collected for various domains and were mapped to structure, process and outcome. They were then benchmarked to identify best practices and deficiencies.

Results: A total of 386 PNBs were recorded, of which 196 (50.8%) were directly observed. Majority were administered to low-risk individuals without comorbidities (61.9%). In the structure metrics resuscitation equipment was available in 76% while availability of resuscitation drugs (29%) was identified as needing improvement. Individual components of process metrics such as intravenous access, use of personal protective equipment, ultrasound guided block technique and use of short bevel needles exceeded the 95% benchmark, while components such as monitoring (54%), aseptic site preparation (76.5%), the Stop Before You Block procedure (61.9%) and use of block additives (70.2%) fell short of the benchmark. Postoperative multimodal analgesia prescription (4.7%) was identified as needing improvement. Of the outcome metrics, while immediate post-block complications (0%) and conversion rate to general anesthesia (8.3%) exceeded the benchmark (< 10%), cumulative toxic dose was exceeded (36.6%) when a mixture of local anesthetics was used.

Conclusion: Standards of practice for structure, process and outcome were partly achieved for PNB at this tertiary care center in a low-middle income country. Strategies to improve SoP have been proposed and will need to be evaluated in future quality improvement initiatives.

中低收入国家三级保健中心外周神经阻滞的实践标准——一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:周围神经阻滞(PNB)作为一种提供麻醉和镇痛的手段已经引起了极大的兴趣。PNB的实践标准(SoP)存在异质性,特别是在资源有限的情况下。因此,本研究旨在确定中低收入国家(LMIC)三级保健大学教学医院的PNB管理标准。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,于2021年9月至2023年3月进行。通过直接或间接观察收集SoP,使用自行开发的形式。收集了各个领域的数据,并将其映射到结构、过程和结果。然后对它们进行基准测试,以确定最佳实践和不足之处。结果:共记录pnb 386例,其中直接观察196例(50.8%)。大多数治疗对象为无合并症的低危个体(61.9%)。在结构指标中,76%的人有复苏设备,而复苏药物的可用性(29%)被认为需要改进。工艺指标的个别组成部分,如静脉注射、个人防护装备的使用、超声引导阻断技术和短斜针的使用,超过了95%的基准,而监测(54%)、无菌部位准备(76.5%)、阻断前停止程序(61.9%)和阻断添加剂的使用(70.2%)等组成部分低于基准。术后多模式镇痛处方(4.7%)被认为需要改进。在结果指标中,即时阻滞后并发症(0%)和全麻转换率(8.3%)超过了基准(结论:在中低收入国家的这个三级保健中心,PNB的结构、过程和结果部分达到了实践标准)。已提出改进SoP的策略,并需要在未来的质量改进计划中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信