Mental Health Caught in the Crossfire: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), Stigma, and the Political Debate.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cameron Lanier, Tyler Melton
{"title":"Mental Health Caught in the Crossfire: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), Stigma, and the Political Debate.","authors":"Cameron Lanier, Tyler Melton","doi":"10.1177/10600280251341861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent rhetoric in the media and from the United States Federal Government has called into question the effectiveness of antidepressants, namely selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), among other psychiatric pharmacotherapies. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have also been mentioned as potentially addictive similar to illicit narcotics and a potential threat to patients despite their status as first-line medications in treating depression. The purpose of this commentary is to review the potentially damaging effects such actions and language could have on patient perceptions of their conditions and medications, adherence, and in patients seeking mental healthcare secondary to the reinforcement of damaging stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280251341861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251341861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent rhetoric in the media and from the United States Federal Government has called into question the effectiveness of antidepressants, namely selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), among other psychiatric pharmacotherapies. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have also been mentioned as potentially addictive similar to illicit narcotics and a potential threat to patients despite their status as first-line medications in treating depression. The purpose of this commentary is to review the potentially damaging effects such actions and language could have on patient perceptions of their conditions and medications, adherence, and in patients seeking mental healthcare secondary to the reinforcement of damaging stigma.

精神健康陷入交火:选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),污名和政治辩论。
最近媒体和美国联邦政府的言论对抗抑郁药的有效性提出了质疑,即选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),以及其他精神药物疗法。选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂也被认为与非法麻醉药类似,具有潜在的成瘾性,尽管它们是治疗抑郁症的一线药物,但对患者具有潜在的威胁。本评论的目的是审查此类行为和语言可能对患者对其病情和药物的认知、依从性以及寻求精神保健的患者产生的潜在破坏性影响,这些影响继发于破坏性污名的强化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信