Tina Sullivan, Matt Yost, Jessica Schad, Marion Murray
{"title":"Lessons learned from the rise and the fall of floral hemp production in Utah","authors":"Tina Sullivan, Matt Yost, Jessica Schad, Marion Murray","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The floral hemp (<i>Cannabis sativa</i> L.) industry rapidly emerged in Utah in 2019 with 217 licensed growers on nearly 400 ha and has since declined annually due to market uncertainty. This scenario provided a unique opportunity to understand barriers to market entry, production challenges, and opportunities for research and education for this emerging crop. To gather information, we delivered an online survey in spring 2021 to licensed floral hemp Utah growers. Note that 85 complete responses were received by August, representing 72% of Utah counties and covering both outdoor and indoor production. Many respondents (62%) grew more than one cultivar, with Trump, Cherry Wine, and Trophy Wife being most common. Fertilizer needs were determined by plant vigor visual symptoms (14%) or crop consultants’ recommendations (16%), and often in combination with commercial lab recommendations (25%). Growers commonly reported limited fertilizer applications and those who did apply N used a rate of 10–160 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. Irrigation by drip was most common, with rates ranging between 279 and 508 mm (35%), and previous experience (35%) and soil moisture sensors (47%) were the most common rate determinants. Pest management responses were less focused with a wide range of reported pests. Reported production costs ranged widely from $1200 to $49,000 ha<sup>−1</sup> with 43% of respondents not selling their harvested biomass at season end and often storing material, which required them to continue holding a license. Results indicate opportunities for improved fertilizer, irrigation, and pest management practices for hemp producers in Utah to narrow and refine product quality, production costs, and revenues.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The floral hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) industry rapidly emerged in Utah in 2019 with 217 licensed growers on nearly 400 ha and has since declined annually due to market uncertainty. This scenario provided a unique opportunity to understand barriers to market entry, production challenges, and opportunities for research and education for this emerging crop. To gather information, we delivered an online survey in spring 2021 to licensed floral hemp Utah growers. Note that 85 complete responses were received by August, representing 72% of Utah counties and covering both outdoor and indoor production. Many respondents (62%) grew more than one cultivar, with Trump, Cherry Wine, and Trophy Wife being most common. Fertilizer needs were determined by plant vigor visual symptoms (14%) or crop consultants’ recommendations (16%), and often in combination with commercial lab recommendations (25%). Growers commonly reported limited fertilizer applications and those who did apply N used a rate of 10–160 kg N ha−1. Irrigation by drip was most common, with rates ranging between 279 and 508 mm (35%), and previous experience (35%) and soil moisture sensors (47%) were the most common rate determinants. Pest management responses were less focused with a wide range of reported pests. Reported production costs ranged widely from $1200 to $49,000 ha−1 with 43% of respondents not selling their harvested biomass at season end and often storing material, which required them to continue holding a license. Results indicate opportunities for improved fertilizer, irrigation, and pest management practices for hemp producers in Utah to narrow and refine product quality, production costs, and revenues.
2019年,花大麻产业在犹他州迅速兴起,有217名持牌种植者,占地近400公顷,此后由于市场不确定性,每年都在下降。这种情况为了解这种新兴作物的市场准入障碍、生产挑战以及研究和教育机会提供了独特的机会。为了收集信息,我们于2021年春季向犹他州持牌花大麻种植者进行了在线调查。值得注意的是,截至8月,共收到85份完整的回复,代表了犹他州72%的县,涵盖了室外和室内生产。许多受访者(62%)种植了不止一种葡萄品种,其中最常见的是特朗普、樱桃酒和花瓶妻子。肥料需求由植物活力、视觉症状(14%)或作物顾问建议(16%)确定,通常与商业实验室建议(25%)结合使用。种植者普遍报告肥料施用有限,施氮者施氮量为10-160 kg N ha - 1。滴灌是最常见的,滴灌率在279到508毫米之间(35%),以前的经验(35%)和土壤湿度传感器(47%)是最常见的决定率的因素。有害生物管理对策较少集中于广泛报告的有害生物。报告的生产成本从1200美元到49,000美元不等- 1,43%的受访者在季节结束时不出售其收获的生物质,通常储存材料,这需要他们继续持有许可证。结果表明,犹他州大麻生产商有机会改进肥料、灌溉和病虫害管理措施,以缩小和改善产品质量、生产成本和收入。