{"title":"Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia","authors":"Priya Datar, Nico Zin","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Difficult intubation in obstetric anaesthesia remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Recent quoted estimates for difficult intubation vary between 1:19 and 1:49 whilst for failed intubation they vary between 1:180 and 1:808. Physiological changes during pregnancy, low general anaesthesia (GA) rates in obstetrics contributing to limited training opportunities, increased obstetric activity performed out-of-hours, a time-pressure environment, isolated location, and obstetric emergencies for which a GA is often utilized are cited contributing to difficult and failed intubation in obstetrics. Human factors often contribute to most situations in difficult and failed intubations. Recent studies seem to highlight that the majority of risk factors contributing to difficult or failed intubation in obstetrics are non-obstetric in nature. Propofol use during GA in obstetric surgery has been associated with a lower risk of difficult intubation. The joint Difficult Airway Society (DAS) and Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association (OAA) guidelines offer a structured algorithmic approach with decision-making tools to enhance safety. Key strategies include understanding contributing factors, thorough preoperative assessment, planning, good communication and multidisciplinary training and simulation. Adherence to these guidelines is crucial for reducing the maternal and fetal morbidity from difficult or failed intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"Pages 295-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147202992500044X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Difficult intubation in obstetric anaesthesia remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Recent quoted estimates for difficult intubation vary between 1:19 and 1:49 whilst for failed intubation they vary between 1:180 and 1:808. Physiological changes during pregnancy, low general anaesthesia (GA) rates in obstetrics contributing to limited training opportunities, increased obstetric activity performed out-of-hours, a time-pressure environment, isolated location, and obstetric emergencies for which a GA is often utilized are cited contributing to difficult and failed intubation in obstetrics. Human factors often contribute to most situations in difficult and failed intubations. Recent studies seem to highlight that the majority of risk factors contributing to difficult or failed intubation in obstetrics are non-obstetric in nature. Propofol use during GA in obstetric surgery has been associated with a lower risk of difficult intubation. The joint Difficult Airway Society (DAS) and Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association (OAA) guidelines offer a structured algorithmic approach with decision-making tools to enhance safety. Key strategies include understanding contributing factors, thorough preoperative assessment, planning, good communication and multidisciplinary training and simulation. Adherence to these guidelines is crucial for reducing the maternal and fetal morbidity from difficult or failed intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.