In vivo percutaneous microwave ablation with ECO system in swine kidney and liver: comparison of ablation-zone size to manufacturer predictions and assessment of new antenna design

Théo Bonnefoy , Georges Tarris , Kévin Guillen , Olivia Poupardin , Olivier Chevallier , Ludwig Serge Aho Glele , Jean-Michel Correas , Romaric Loffroy
{"title":"In vivo percutaneous microwave ablation with ECO system in swine kidney and liver: comparison of ablation-zone size to manufacturer predictions and assessment of new antenna design","authors":"Théo Bonnefoy ,&nbsp;Georges Tarris ,&nbsp;Kévin Guillen ,&nbsp;Olivia Poupardin ,&nbsp;Olivier Chevallier ,&nbsp;Ludwig Serge Aho Glele ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Correas ,&nbsp;Romaric Loffroy","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2025.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for small tumors. To achieve local disease control, the entire tumor and a surrounding safety margin must be destroyed. Power and application time are chosen based on manufacturer-provided data, usually obtained from ex vivo animal models. However, ex vivo tissues differ from in vivo condition due to compositional changes and absence of heat dissipation by blood flow. This study aimed to compare in vivo ablation zone sizes in swine with those predicted by the device manufacturer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five pigs underwent 40 microwave ablation procedures using various power-time-organ combinations; 18 hepatic and 20 renal zones were evaluable. All procedures were performed with devices from a single manufacturer (ECO Microwave System Co, Nanjing, China). After euthanasia, the ablation zones were excised and sliced. For each ablation, the slice showing the largest dimensions was selected to measure x and y diameters and used to compute the ablated surface area.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For seven of eight power-time-organ combinations, significant differences were found between predicted and measured surface areas (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), with deviations ranging from –45 % to +54 %. The overall mean absolute differences between measured and predicted ablation sizes in the x and y dimensions and the ablation surface area were 7.6 ± 4.6 mm (28 % ± 19 %), 5.8 ± 4.3 mm (18 % ± 13 %) and 273 ± 210 mm² (39 % ± 34 %), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Manufacturer-provided predictive data for microwave ablation zone size may lack reliability. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of ablation zone size is crucial to ensure complete tumor destruction with adequate margins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652525000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for small tumors. To achieve local disease control, the entire tumor and a surrounding safety margin must be destroyed. Power and application time are chosen based on manufacturer-provided data, usually obtained from ex vivo animal models. However, ex vivo tissues differ from in vivo condition due to compositional changes and absence of heat dissipation by blood flow. This study aimed to compare in vivo ablation zone sizes in swine with those predicted by the device manufacturer.

Methods

Five pigs underwent 40 microwave ablation procedures using various power-time-organ combinations; 18 hepatic and 20 renal zones were evaluable. All procedures were performed with devices from a single manufacturer (ECO Microwave System Co, Nanjing, China). After euthanasia, the ablation zones were excised and sliced. For each ablation, the slice showing the largest dimensions was selected to measure x and y diameters and used to compute the ablated surface area.

Results

For seven of eight power-time-organ combinations, significant differences were found between predicted and measured surface areas (p < 0.05), with deviations ranging from –45 % to +54 %. The overall mean absolute differences between measured and predicted ablation sizes in the x and y dimensions and the ablation surface area were 7.6 ± 4.6 mm (28 % ± 19 %), 5.8 ± 4.3 mm (18 % ± 13 %) and 273 ± 210 mm² (39 % ± 34 %), respectively.

Conclusion

Manufacturer-provided predictive data for microwave ablation zone size may lack reliability. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of ablation zone size is crucial to ensure complete tumor destruction with adequate margins.
ECO系统在猪肾脏和肝脏的体内经皮微波消融:消融区大小与制造商预测的比较和新天线设计的评估
经皮微波消融术是一种有效的微创小肿瘤治疗方法。为了实现局部疾病控制,必须破坏整个肿瘤和周围的安全边际。功率和应用时间的选择基于制造商提供的数据,通常从离体动物模型中获得。然而,离体组织与体内组织不同,因为组织成分发生了变化,并且没有血流散热。本研究旨在比较猪体内消融区大小与设备制造商预测的大小。方法5头猪采用不同功率-时间-器官组合进行40次微波消融术;18个肝区和20个肾区可评价。所有操作均由同一制造商(ECO Microwave System Co, Nanjing, China)提供。安乐死后,切除消融区并切片。对于每次烧蚀,选择显示最大尺寸的切片来测量x和y直径,并用于计算烧蚀表面积。结果对于8个功率-时间-器官组合中的7个,预测表面积与测量表面积之间存在显著差异(p <;0.05),偏差范围从- 45%到+ 54%。实测和预测的消融尺寸在x和y尺寸及消融表面积上的总体平均绝对差值分别为7.6±4.6 mm(28%±19%)、5.8±4.3 mm(18%±13%)和273±210 mm²(39%±34%)。结论厂商提供的微波消融区大小预测数据缺乏可靠性。术中及术后监测消融区大小对于确保肿瘤的完全破坏和足够的边缘是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信