Improving laboratory stewardship through benchmarking: A focus on thyroid function tests ordering

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ka Keung Chan , Suhhyun Kim , Patrick C. Mathias , Jane Dickerson , Hsuan-Chieh Liao
{"title":"Improving laboratory stewardship through benchmarking: A focus on thyroid function tests ordering","authors":"Ka Keung Chan ,&nbsp;Suhhyun Kim ,&nbsp;Patrick C. Mathias ,&nbsp;Jane Dickerson ,&nbsp;Hsuan-Chieh Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Thyroid function tests, particularly thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (fT4), are among the most frequently ordered laboratory tests. This study evaluates longitudinal trends in thyroid testing utilization, assesses the impact of TSH-first reflex testing, and examines specialty-specific differences in test ordering patterns under the PLUGS (Patient-Centered Laboratory Utilization Guidance Services) benchmarking guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed TSH and fT4 test volumes from the year 2009 to 2023. A TSH reflex algorithm, which automatically orders fT4 following an abnormal TSH, was implemented in 2016. The metrics were evaluated using the TSH to fT4 ratio (TSH/fT4) and the percentage of fT4 tests associated with abnormal TSH. Specialty-specific differences were assessed by categorizing providers’ specialty, comparing benchmark patterns and diagnostic codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both TSH and fT4 testing volume increased significantly from 2009 to 2023. After the implementation of TSH-first reflex algorithm, TSH/fT4 stabilized (∼3.7) and the percentage of fT4 tests associated with abnormal TSH increased significantly from 26 % to 39 %. Providers from primary care demonstrated stronger adherence to the reflex testing, whereas endocrinology and oncology required more tailored approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This first longitudinal analysis of thyroid testing under the PLUGS benchmark guidelines highlights improved efficiency following reflex test implementation, though specialty-specific differences persist. Consensus-based benchmarks and laboratory stewardship initiatives further enhance test utilization efficiency, optimize workflow, and ensure appropriate thyroid function testing across diverse clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 110952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009912025000815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Thyroid function tests, particularly thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (fT4), are among the most frequently ordered laboratory tests. This study evaluates longitudinal trends in thyroid testing utilization, assesses the impact of TSH-first reflex testing, and examines specialty-specific differences in test ordering patterns under the PLUGS (Patient-Centered Laboratory Utilization Guidance Services) benchmarking guidelines.

Methods

We analyzed TSH and fT4 test volumes from the year 2009 to 2023. A TSH reflex algorithm, which automatically orders fT4 following an abnormal TSH, was implemented in 2016. The metrics were evaluated using the TSH to fT4 ratio (TSH/fT4) and the percentage of fT4 tests associated with abnormal TSH. Specialty-specific differences were assessed by categorizing providers’ specialty, comparing benchmark patterns and diagnostic codes.

Results

Both TSH and fT4 testing volume increased significantly from 2009 to 2023. After the implementation of TSH-first reflex algorithm, TSH/fT4 stabilized (∼3.7) and the percentage of fT4 tests associated with abnormal TSH increased significantly from 26 % to 39 %. Providers from primary care demonstrated stronger adherence to the reflex testing, whereas endocrinology and oncology required more tailored approaches.

Conclusions

This first longitudinal analysis of thyroid testing under the PLUGS benchmark guidelines highlights improved efficiency following reflex test implementation, though specialty-specific differences persist. Consensus-based benchmarks and laboratory stewardship initiatives further enhance test utilization efficiency, optimize workflow, and ensure appropriate thyroid function testing across diverse clinical settings.
通过标杆管理改进实验室管理:重点关注甲状腺功能测试订购
目的甲状腺功能检查,尤其是促甲状腺激素(TSH)和游离甲状腺素(fT4),是最常用的实验室检查。本研究评估了甲状腺检测使用的纵向趋势,评估了TSH-first反射检测的影响,并在插头(以患者为中心的实验室利用指导服务)基准指南下检查了检测订购模式的特殊差异。方法分析2009 - 2023年的TSH和fT4检测量。TSH反射算法在2016年实现,该算法在TSH异常时自动订购fT4。使用TSH/fT4比率(TSH/fT4)和fT4测试与异常TSH相关的百分比来评估指标。通过对提供者的专业进行分类,比较基准模式和诊断代码来评估特定专业的差异。结果2009 - 2023年TSH和fT4检测量均显著增加。实施TSH-first反射算法后,TSH/fT4稳定(~ 3.7),fT4检测与异常TSH相关的百分比从26%显著增加到39%。初级保健提供者对反射测试的依从性更强,而内分泌学和肿瘤学则需要更量身定制的方法。这是第一次在plug基准指南下对甲状腺测试的纵向分析,强调了反射测试实施后效率的提高,尽管特殊特异性差异仍然存在。基于共识的基准和实验室管理举措进一步提高了测试利用效率,优化了工作流程,并确保在不同的临床环境中进行适当的甲状腺功能测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信