Combining summary statistics with simulation-based inference for the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionisation

IF 5.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
B. Semelin, R. Mériot, A. Mishra, D. Cornu
{"title":"Combining summary statistics with simulation-based inference for the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionisation","authors":"B. Semelin, R. Mériot, A. Mishra, D. Cornu","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202453115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionisation will be observed with the upcoming Square Kilometer Array (SKA). We expect it to yield a full tomography of the signal, which opens up the possibility to explore its non-Gaussian properties. This raises the question of how can we extract the maximum information from tomography and derive the tightest constraint on the signal. In this work, instead of looking for the most informative summary statistics, we investigate how to combine the information from two sets of summary statistics using simulation-based inference. To this end, we trained neural density estimators (NDE) to fit the implicit likelihood of our model, the LICORICE code, using the Loreli II database. We trained three different NDEs: one to perform Bayesian inference on the power spectrum, one to perform it on the linear moments of the pixel distribution function (PDF), and one to work with the combination of the two. We performed ∼900 inferences at different points in our parameter space and used them to assess both the validity of our posteriors with a simulation-based calibration (SBC) and the typical gain obtained by combining summary statistics. We find that our posteriors are biased by no more than ∼20% of their standard deviation and under-confident by no more than ∼15%. Then, we established that combining summary statistics produces a contraction of the 4D volume of the posterior (derived from the generalised variance) in 91.5% of our cases, and in 70–80% of the cases for the marginalised 1D posteriors. The median volume variation is a contraction of a factor of a few for the 4D posteriors and a contraction of 20–30% in the case of the marginalised 1D posteriors. This shows that our approach is a possible alternative to looking for so-called sufficient statistics in the theoretical sense.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionisation will be observed with the upcoming Square Kilometer Array (SKA). We expect it to yield a full tomography of the signal, which opens up the possibility to explore its non-Gaussian properties. This raises the question of how can we extract the maximum information from tomography and derive the tightest constraint on the signal. In this work, instead of looking for the most informative summary statistics, we investigate how to combine the information from two sets of summary statistics using simulation-based inference. To this end, we trained neural density estimators (NDE) to fit the implicit likelihood of our model, the LICORICE code, using the Loreli II database. We trained three different NDEs: one to perform Bayesian inference on the power spectrum, one to perform it on the linear moments of the pixel distribution function (PDF), and one to work with the combination of the two. We performed ∼900 inferences at different points in our parameter space and used them to assess both the validity of our posteriors with a simulation-based calibration (SBC) and the typical gain obtained by combining summary statistics. We find that our posteriors are biased by no more than ∼20% of their standard deviation and under-confident by no more than ∼15%. Then, we established that combining summary statistics produces a contraction of the 4D volume of the posterior (derived from the generalised variance) in 91.5% of our cases, and in 70–80% of the cases for the marginalised 1D posteriors. The median volume variation is a contraction of a factor of a few for the 4D posteriors and a contraction of 20–30% in the case of the marginalised 1D posteriors. This shows that our approach is a possible alternative to looking for so-called sufficient statistics in the theoretical sense.
结合汇总统计和基于模拟的推断从再电离时代的21厘米信号
来自再电离时代的21厘米信号将被即将到来的平方公里阵列(SKA)观测到。我们期望它能产生信号的完整层析成像,这为探索其非高斯性质开辟了可能性。这就提出了一个问题,即我们如何从断层扫描中提取最大的信息,并得出信号上最严格的约束。在这项工作中,我们不是寻找最具信息量的汇总统计,而是研究如何使用基于模拟的推理来组合来自两组汇总统计的信息。为此,我们使用Loreli II数据库训练神经密度估计器(NDE)来拟合我们的模型(LICORICE代码)的隐式似然。我们训练了三种不同的nde:一种用于在功率谱上执行贝叶斯推理,一种用于在像素分布函数的线性矩上执行贝叶斯推理,另一种用于两者的组合。我们在参数空间的不同点执行了~ 900个推断,并使用它们来评估基于模拟的校准(SBC)的后验的有效性和通过结合汇总统计获得的典型增益。我们发现后验的偏差不超过标准偏差的20%,不超过自信的15%。然后,我们确定,在91.5%的病例中,结合汇总统计会产生后侧4D体积的收缩(来自广义方差),而在边缘1D后侧的病例中,这一比例为70-80%。中位体积变化是4D后位的几个收缩因子,在边缘1D后位的情况下收缩20-30%。这表明,我们的方法是在理论意义上寻找所谓的充分统计的一种可能的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信