Controlled expansion stent grafts versus legacy stent grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a single-centre retrospective study on the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Afonso Fonseca, Rui Ramos, Élia Coimbra, António Caetano, Teresa Neves, Rafaela Pereira, Inês Conde Vasco, Marta Alves, Tiago Bilhim
{"title":"Controlled expansion stent grafts versus legacy stent grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a single-centre retrospective study on the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.","authors":"Afonso Fonseca, Rui Ramos, Élia Coimbra, António Caetano, Teresa Neves, Rafaela Pereira, Inês Conde Vasco, Marta Alves, Tiago Bilhim","doi":"10.1186/s42155-025-00557-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assess incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients treated with 8-10 mm Controlled Expansion diameter VIATORR® (VCX) versus 10 mm diameter first-generation VIATORR® (Legacy) stent-grafts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-centre retrospective study (January 2015 to March 2024), including 132 adult patients with cirrhosis treated with TIPS due to complications of portal hypertension. Outcomes included post-TIPS new onset overt HE, ascites response, re-bleeding, mortality and portal pressure gradient (PPG) before and after TIPS. Comparisons used Chi square and Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables and Student´s t test or Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (n = 82) and variceal bleeding (n = 50). The VCX group (n = 85) and the Legacy group (n = 47) had similar new onset overt HE: 37% (31/85) vs 43% (20/47), respectively (p = 0.31); mortality rates (34% [29/85]) vs 39% [18/47], respectively, p = 0.57) and re-bleeding (17% [6/35] vs 20% [3/15], respectively, p = 1.00). Median PPG reduction after TIPS was 10 mmHg (7 - 13) in the VCX group and 12 mmHg (9 - 15) in the Legacy group (p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis revealed post TIPS overt HE rate of 38% (19/50) in the VCX group vs 53% (17/32) in the Legacy group (p = 0.13), with refractory ascites as an indication. Shunt dysfunction rate was 7% (6/85) in the VCX group (stent thrombosis n = 6, stenosis or malpositioning n = 0) and 0% (0/47) in the Legacy group (p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCX stent grafts induce an immediate lower PPG reduction, which might lead to more stent dysfunctions, but also to a reduction in post-TIPS HE.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"8 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-025-00557-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Assess incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients treated with 8-10 mm Controlled Expansion diameter VIATORR® (VCX) versus 10 mm diameter first-generation VIATORR® (Legacy) stent-grafts.

Materials and methods: Single-centre retrospective study (January 2015 to March 2024), including 132 adult patients with cirrhosis treated with TIPS due to complications of portal hypertension. Outcomes included post-TIPS new onset overt HE, ascites response, re-bleeding, mortality and portal pressure gradient (PPG) before and after TIPS. Comparisons used Chi square and Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables and Student´s t test or Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables.

Results: Indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (n = 82) and variceal bleeding (n = 50). The VCX group (n = 85) and the Legacy group (n = 47) had similar new onset overt HE: 37% (31/85) vs 43% (20/47), respectively (p = 0.31); mortality rates (34% [29/85]) vs 39% [18/47], respectively, p = 0.57) and re-bleeding (17% [6/35] vs 20% [3/15], respectively, p = 1.00). Median PPG reduction after TIPS was 10 mmHg (7 - 13) in the VCX group and 12 mmHg (9 - 15) in the Legacy group (p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis revealed post TIPS overt HE rate of 38% (19/50) in the VCX group vs 53% (17/32) in the Legacy group (p = 0.13), with refractory ascites as an indication. Shunt dysfunction rate was 7% (6/85) in the VCX group (stent thrombosis n = 6, stenosis or malpositioning n = 0) and 0% (0/47) in the Legacy group (p = 0.09).

Conclusion: VCX stent grafts induce an immediate lower PPG reduction, which might lead to more stent dysfunctions, but also to a reduction in post-TIPS HE.

经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术的控制扩张支架移植与遗留支架移植:肝性脑病发病率的单中心回顾性研究。
目的:评估8-10毫米控制扩张直径VIATORR®(VCX)与10毫米直径第一代VIATORR®(Legacy)支架移植患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后肝性脑病(HE)的发生率。材料与方法:单中心回顾性研究(2015年1月- 2024年3月),纳入132例门静脉高压症合并肝硬化行TIPS治疗的成人患者。结果包括TIPS后新发明显HE、腹水反应、再出血、死亡率和TIPS前后门静脉压力梯度(PPG)。比较对分类变量使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,对定量变量使用Student t检验或Mann-Whitney检验。结果:TIPS的适应症为难治性腹水(n = 82)和静脉曲张出血(n = 50)。VCX组(n = 85)和Legacy组(n = 47)有相似的新发显性HE:分别为37%(31/85)和43% (20/47)(p = 0.31);死亡率(34% [29/85]vs 39% [18/47], p = 0.57)和再出血(17% [6/35]vs 20% [3/15], p = 1.00)。TIPS后,VCX组中位PPG降低10 mmHg (7 - 13), Legacy组中位PPG降低12 mmHg (9 - 15) (p = 0.02)。亚组分析显示,TIPS后,VCX组明显HE发生率为38%(19/50),而Legacy组为53% (17/32)(p = 0.13),难治性腹水为指征。VCX组(支架血栓形成n = 6,狭窄或错位n = 0)的分流功能障碍率为7% (6/85),Legacy组(0/47)为0% (p = 0.09)。结论:VCX支架移植可立即降低PPG,这可能导致更多的支架功能障碍,但也会降低tips后HE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信