{"title":"Optimizing arm placement in the Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system-based hysterectomy: development and validation of a simplified \"Narrow setting\" approach.","authors":"Takahiro Nozaki, Keiko Kagami, Eriko Kawataki, Mitsunori Uchida, Kosuke Matsuda, Ikuko Sakamoto","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02254-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to determine the usefulness of the new setup, the \"Narrow setting,\" by examining our initial experience with the Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system. 78 hysterectomies using the Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system performed in \"Narrow setting\" at our institution from November 2023 to December 2024 were included in this study. We retrospectively examined the patient's clinical information and surgical outcomes from the medical record. We also investigated the learning curve of docking time in this setting by cumulative summation analysis. The median age, body mass index, and uterine weight of the patients were 48 (31-76) years, 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (16.1-42.4), and 178 g (40-2000 g), respectively. More than half of the surgical indications were uterine myomas (52.6%, 41/78). The median operative, console, and docking times were 68 min (48-198 min), 46 min (29-151 min), and 9 min (6-31 min), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 5 mL (5-220 mL). A total of eight perioperative complications were observed, but only one was classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher. No conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery was required. The learning curve for docking time showed that docking in the \"Narrow setting\" can be proficient in 19 cases. We reported on our initial experience with hysterectomy using the Hugo<sup>™</sup> RAS system and found the \"Narrow setting\" to be safe and efficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02254-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We aimed to determine the usefulness of the new setup, the "Narrow setting," by examining our initial experience with the Hugo™ RAS system. 78 hysterectomies using the Hugo™ RAS system performed in "Narrow setting" at our institution from November 2023 to December 2024 were included in this study. We retrospectively examined the patient's clinical information and surgical outcomes from the medical record. We also investigated the learning curve of docking time in this setting by cumulative summation analysis. The median age, body mass index, and uterine weight of the patients were 48 (31-76) years, 22.9 kg/m2 (16.1-42.4), and 178 g (40-2000 g), respectively. More than half of the surgical indications were uterine myomas (52.6%, 41/78). The median operative, console, and docking times were 68 min (48-198 min), 46 min (29-151 min), and 9 min (6-31 min), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 5 mL (5-220 mL). A total of eight perioperative complications were observed, but only one was classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher. No conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery was required. The learning curve for docking time showed that docking in the "Narrow setting" can be proficient in 19 cases. We reported on our initial experience with hysterectomy using the Hugo™ RAS system and found the "Narrow setting" to be safe and efficient.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.