Michael J Farias, Manjot Singh, Ashley Knebel, Mohammad Daher, Joseph E Nassar, Maxwell Sahhar, Sarah L Criddle, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels
{"title":"Hip osteoarthritis is associated with higher revision rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.","authors":"Michael J Farias, Manjot Singh, Ashley Knebel, Mohammad Daher, Joseph E Nassar, Maxwell Sahhar, Sarah L Criddle, Bassel G Diebo, Alan H Daniels","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08943-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with concurrent hip osteoarthritis (OA) and lumbar spinal pathologies often present with more disability and worse baseline measures of pain and function compared to patients with only spinal disease. However, the impact of hip OA on outcomes following specific spinal fusion techniques, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), is not well established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with and without hip OA who underwent TLIF at a single academic institution were identified. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline demographics, one-year postoperative surgical complications, and preoperative to one-year postoperative change in PROMs were compared. Multivariate regression analysis, accounting for age, sex, and CCI, were performed to evaluate outcomes in hip OA patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 234 included patients, 117 had hip OA and 117 did not. The mean age was 63.7 years, 54.3% were females, the mean CCI was 3.2, and the mean follow-up was 30.6 months. Hip OA patients had a higher revision fusion rate compared to non-hip OA patients (19.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.002), with 4.18 times higher odds of revision (95% CI = 1.63-10.70, p = 0.003). At one year postoperatively, patients with hip OA had significantly worse VAS Leg scores (5.04 vs. 3.95, p = 0.005) and demonstrated less improvement in VAS Leg (- 1.61 vs. -2.81, p = 0.008) than non-hip OA patients. Other PROMs did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This investigation revealed that patients with hip OA undergoing TLIF have higher revision rates and worse VAS leg pain compared to those without hip OA. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive evaluation and multidisciplinary care of hip and spine disorders in patients undergoing spine surgery, which can guide surgical decision making and patient counselling, with potential to improve postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08943-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with concurrent hip osteoarthritis (OA) and lumbar spinal pathologies often present with more disability and worse baseline measures of pain and function compared to patients with only spinal disease. However, the impact of hip OA on outcomes following specific spinal fusion techniques, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), is not well established.
Methods: Patients with and without hip OA who underwent TLIF at a single academic institution were identified. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline demographics, one-year postoperative surgical complications, and preoperative to one-year postoperative change in PROMs were compared. Multivariate regression analysis, accounting for age, sex, and CCI, were performed to evaluate outcomes in hip OA patients.
Results: Among the 234 included patients, 117 had hip OA and 117 did not. The mean age was 63.7 years, 54.3% were females, the mean CCI was 3.2, and the mean follow-up was 30.6 months. Hip OA patients had a higher revision fusion rate compared to non-hip OA patients (19.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.002), with 4.18 times higher odds of revision (95% CI = 1.63-10.70, p = 0.003). At one year postoperatively, patients with hip OA had significantly worse VAS Leg scores (5.04 vs. 3.95, p = 0.005) and demonstrated less improvement in VAS Leg (- 1.61 vs. -2.81, p = 0.008) than non-hip OA patients. Other PROMs did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusions: This investigation revealed that patients with hip OA undergoing TLIF have higher revision rates and worse VAS leg pain compared to those without hip OA. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive evaluation and multidisciplinary care of hip and spine disorders in patients undergoing spine surgery, which can guide surgical decision making and patient counselling, with potential to improve postoperative outcomes.
目的:与仅患有脊柱疾病的患者相比,患有并发髋关节骨关节炎(OA)和腰椎病变的患者通常表现为更多的残疾和更差的疼痛和功能基线测量。然而,髋关节骨关节炎对特定脊柱融合技术(如经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF))后预后的影响尚未得到很好的证实。方法:确定在单一学术机构接受TLIF治疗的患有和不患有髋关节OA的患者。排除全髋关节置换术患者。比较基线人口统计学、术后一年手术并发症和术前至术后一年PROMs的变化。采用多变量回归分析,考虑年龄、性别和CCI,评估髋关节OA患者的预后。结果:在234例纳入的患者中,117例患有髋关节OA, 117例没有。平均年龄63.7岁,女性占54.3%,平均CCI为3.2,平均随访30.6个月。与非髋关节OA患者相比,髋关节OA患者的翻修融合率更高(19.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.002),翻修的几率高4.18倍(95% CI = 1.63-10.70, p = 0.003)。术后1年,髋关节OA患者的VAS Leg评分明显低于非髋关节OA患者(5.04 vs. 3.95, p = 0.005), VAS Leg改善程度较低(- 1.61 vs. -2.81, p = 0.008)。其他prom在两组之间没有显著差异。结论:本研究显示,与没有髋关节OA的患者相比,接受TLIF的髋关节OA患者有更高的翻修率和更严重的VAS腿部疼痛。这突出了对脊柱手术患者髋关节和脊柱疾病进行综合评估和多学科护理的重要性,这可以指导手术决策和患者咨询,并有可能改善术后结果。
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe