Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
J E Doe, P Botham, D Holland, M Fuart Gatnik, V Giri, H Kang, P Kalra, S León Pérez, S Marty, S Moors, R Raeburn, E Reale, R Settivari, M Sica, K Z Travis, S J Wijeyesakere
{"title":"Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs.","authors":"J E Doe, P Botham, D Holland, M Fuart Gatnik, V Giri, H Kang, P Kalra, S León Pérez, S Marty, S Moors, R Raeburn, E Reale, R Settivari, M Sica, K Z Travis, S J Wijeyesakere","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-04069-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>EPAA's 'NAM Designathon 2023' challenge for human toxicity sought to identify a classification system capable of categorising chemicals based on their bioactivity and bioavailability properties determined using non-animal methodologies (Worth et al. 2025). The proposal is made to classify chemicals into three levels of concern: low concern could be used without restriction, medium concern requiring assessment to establish safe use levels and high concern being candidates requiring risk management (Berggren and Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431 , 2023). We developed a NAMs based classification system for \"human systemic toxicity\" mainly focussed on repeat dose toxicity, similar to the assessment carried out in classification for 'Specific Target Organ Toxicity-Repeated Exposure' (STOT-RE) based on ECETOC's Tiered Approach integrating three lines of evidence: In silico predictions, In vitro bioavailability and PBK modelling, In vitro bioactivity assays. The first stage employed an in silico approach, covering several toxicity endpoints across various (Q)SAR in silico models to identify indicators of toxicity. Bioavailability was categorised by simulating 14-day plasma C<sub>max</sub> predictions for a standard dose level using three TK models (Firman et al. in Arch Toxicol 96:817-830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03205-x , 2022). Bioactivity was categorised using a matrix with potency and severity. In vitro data were obtained from ToxCast. Potency makes use of dose response AC50 values. Severity categorisation is based on consideration of the adverse effects associated with the assays. 12 chemicals have been assessed through the framework. Overall, we have demonstrated that the matrix suggested by the EPAA Designathon can be used to categorise chemicals into three different levels of concern but there are areas still to be explored especially for the range of assays used, the framework categorisation being defined, and how such a matrix would fit into a tiered approach, pragmatically, including targeted in vivo studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-04069-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EPAA's 'NAM Designathon 2023' challenge for human toxicity sought to identify a classification system capable of categorising chemicals based on their bioactivity and bioavailability properties determined using non-animal methodologies (Worth et al. 2025). The proposal is made to classify chemicals into three levels of concern: low concern could be used without restriction, medium concern requiring assessment to establish safe use levels and high concern being candidates requiring risk management (Berggren and Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431 , 2023). We developed a NAMs based classification system for "human systemic toxicity" mainly focussed on repeat dose toxicity, similar to the assessment carried out in classification for 'Specific Target Organ Toxicity-Repeated Exposure' (STOT-RE) based on ECETOC's Tiered Approach integrating three lines of evidence: In silico predictions, In vitro bioavailability and PBK modelling, In vitro bioactivity assays. The first stage employed an in silico approach, covering several toxicity endpoints across various (Q)SAR in silico models to identify indicators of toxicity. Bioavailability was categorised by simulating 14-day plasma Cmax predictions for a standard dose level using three TK models (Firman et al. in Arch Toxicol 96:817-830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03205-x , 2022). Bioactivity was categorised using a matrix with potency and severity. In vitro data were obtained from ToxCast. Potency makes use of dose response AC50 values. Severity categorisation is based on consideration of the adverse effects associated with the assays. 12 chemicals have been assessed through the framework. Overall, we have demonstrated that the matrix suggested by the EPAA Designathon can be used to categorise chemicals into three different levels of concern but there are areas still to be explored especially for the range of assays used, the framework categorisation being defined, and how such a matrix would fit into a tiered approach, pragmatically, including targeted in vivo studies.

使用NAMs对化学品进行重复剂量毒性分类的框架。
EPAA的“NAM设计马拉松2023”人类毒性挑战旨在确定一种分类系统,能够根据使用非动物方法确定的生物活性和生物利用度特性对化学品进行分类(Worth et al. 2025)。该建议将化学品分为三个关注级别:低关注可以不受限制地使用,中等关注需要评估以建立安全使用水平,高度关注是需要风险管理的候选物质(Berggren和Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431, 2023)。我们开发了一个基于NAMs的“人体全身毒性”分类系统,主要关注重复剂量毒性,类似于基于ECETOC分层方法的“特异性靶器官毒性-重复暴露”(STOT-RE)分类评估,该方法整合了三条证据线:计算机预测、体外生物利用度和PBK建模、体外生物活性测定。第一阶段采用计算机方法,涵盖各种(Q)SAR计算机模型中的几个毒性终点,以确定毒性指标。通过使用三种TK模型模拟标准剂量水平下14天血浆Cmax预测来对生物利用度进行分类(Firman等人在Arch Toxicol 96:817-830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03205-x, 2022)。生物活性使用效力和严重程度的矩阵进行分类。体外数据来自ToxCast。效价利用剂量反应AC50值。严重性分类是基于与检测相关的不良反应的考虑。通过该框架对12种化学品进行了评估。总体而言,我们已经证明,EPAA设计马拉松建议的矩阵可用于将化学品分类为三个不同的关注级别,但仍有一些领域有待探索,特别是对于所使用的分析范围,正在定义的框架分类,以及这种矩阵如何适合分层方法,务实地,包括靶向体内研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信