Use of digital health tools with point-of-care testing improves access to germline genetic testing within a gastrointestinal cancer clinic

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Catherine Smith, Colleen Caleshu, Danielle Bonadies, Jessica Johnson Denton
{"title":"Use of digital health tools with point-of-care testing improves access to germline genetic testing within a gastrointestinal cancer clinic","authors":"Catherine Smith,&nbsp;Colleen Caleshu,&nbsp;Danielle Bonadies,&nbsp;Jessica Johnson Denton","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many patients who qualify for cancer germline genetic testing do not get offered such testing. Digital health tools (DHTs) and point-of-care (POC) genetic testing have both shown promise to increase access to cancer genetic testing in certain settings. However, there is scant evidence on the impact of either DHTs or POC in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer clinics or on the combined use of DHTs and POC testing. We aimed to determine whether POC genetic testing with DHTs improves (1) the identification of patients for genetic testing and (2) the uptake of genetic testing within a multidisciplinary GI cancer clinic. A retrospective before-and-after study design was used. Data was collected by chart review. Outcomes were the proportion of patients (1) identified for genetic evaluation and (2) consented to genetic testing. In the before group (<i>n</i> = 24), patients were identified for genetic evaluation by physicians and referred to a genetic counseling clinic for testing. In the after group (<i>n</i> = 32), patients had access to POC genetic testing with support from DHTs. The study cohort (<i>n</i> = 56) was 51.8% female with a mean age of 61.1 years (SD = 12.2) and predominantly White (58.8%) or African American (39.2%). In the before group, 6/24 (25%) patients were identified for genetic evaluation compared to 17/32 (53%) in the after group (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Genetic testing uptake was 0% (0/24) in the before group and 25% (8/32) in the after group (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The use of DHTs and a POC genetic testing model improved the identification of patients for genetic testing. While uptake improved, it remained low, suggesting additional approaches are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many patients who qualify for cancer germline genetic testing do not get offered such testing. Digital health tools (DHTs) and point-of-care (POC) genetic testing have both shown promise to increase access to cancer genetic testing in certain settings. However, there is scant evidence on the impact of either DHTs or POC in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer clinics or on the combined use of DHTs and POC testing. We aimed to determine whether POC genetic testing with DHTs improves (1) the identification of patients for genetic testing and (2) the uptake of genetic testing within a multidisciplinary GI cancer clinic. A retrospective before-and-after study design was used. Data was collected by chart review. Outcomes were the proportion of patients (1) identified for genetic evaluation and (2) consented to genetic testing. In the before group (n = 24), patients were identified for genetic evaluation by physicians and referred to a genetic counseling clinic for testing. In the after group (n = 32), patients had access to POC genetic testing with support from DHTs. The study cohort (n = 56) was 51.8% female with a mean age of 61.1 years (SD = 12.2) and predominantly White (58.8%) or African American (39.2%). In the before group, 6/24 (25%) patients were identified for genetic evaluation compared to 17/32 (53%) in the after group (p = 0.03). Genetic testing uptake was 0% (0/24) in the before group and 25% (8/32) in the after group (p = 0.02). The use of DHTs and a POC genetic testing model improved the identification of patients for genetic testing. While uptake improved, it remained low, suggesting additional approaches are needed.

Abstract Image

将数字健康工具与即时检测结合使用,可改善胃肠道癌症诊所的生殖系基因检测
许多有资格进行癌症生殖系基因检测的患者没有得到这样的检测。数字健康工具(dht)和即时护理(POC)基因检测都显示出在某些情况下增加癌症基因检测的希望。然而,关于dht或POC在胃肠道(GI)癌症诊所或dht和POC联合使用检测的影响的证据很少。我们的目的是确定使用dht进行POC基因检测是否改善了(1)对基因检测患者的识别和(2)多学科GI癌症诊所对基因检测的吸收。采用回顾性的前后对照研究设计。数据通过图表审查收集。结果是(1)确定进行基因评估和(2)同意进行基因检测的患者比例。在前一组(n = 24)中,由医生确定患者进行遗传评估,并转介到遗传咨询诊所进行检测。在治疗后组(n = 32),患者可以在dht的支持下进行POC基因检测。研究队列(n = 56)中女性占51.8%,平均年龄为61.1岁(SD = 12.2),主要为白人(58.8%)或非洲裔美国人(39.2%)。治疗前组有6/24例(25%)患者接受遗传评估,治疗后组有17/32例(53%)患者接受遗传评估(p = 0.03)。治疗前组基因检测摄取率为0%(0/24),治疗后组为25% (8/32)(p = 0.02)。dht和POC基因检测模型的使用改善了基因检测患者的识别。虽然吸收率有所提高,但仍然很低,这表明需要采取其他措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信