The effect of different information methods on patients’ anxiety and preference for spinal versus general anesthesia in a Turkish cohort of women scheduled for cesarean delivery: a prospective observational study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
S.Ş. Karataş, O.K. Bulut, S.F. Öner
{"title":"The effect of different information methods on patients’ anxiety and preference for spinal versus general anesthesia in a Turkish cohort of women scheduled for cesarean delivery: a prospective observational study","authors":"S.Ş. Karataş,&nbsp;O.K. Bulut,&nbsp;S.F. Öner","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative anxiety and misconceptions about spinal anesthesia often influence anesthesia preference in cesarean delivery. Patient education may improve both anxiety and informed decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective observational study, 300 pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery received one of three preoperative information methods: verbal explanation, pictorial illustration, or video-based education. Baseline and post- intervention anxiety were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). Anesthesia preference and satisfaction were also recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Spinal anesthesia was initially preferred by 36% of participants. After receiving preoperative information, this rate increased to 73%. Among those who had initially preferred general anesthesia, 58.33% changed their choice. Preference change rates varied by information type: 43.33% following verbal information, 72.22% following graphic illustration information, and 56.67% with video-based information. Significant reductions were observed in both STAI and VAS-A scores across all groups (<em>P</em> &lt;0.005). High satisfaction was reported by most participants, including those who changed their preference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative education significantly reduced anxiety and influenced anesthesia preference (changing from general to spinal anesthesia) for elective cesarean delivery. Graphic illustration were the most effective in promoting a change in preference in favor of spinal anesthesia. Integrating structured, visual educational tools into preoperative counseling may support informed maternal decision-making and improve perioperative experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X2500281X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preoperative anxiety and misconceptions about spinal anesthesia often influence anesthesia preference in cesarean delivery. Patient education may improve both anxiety and informed decision-making.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, 300 pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery received one of three preoperative information methods: verbal explanation, pictorial illustration, or video-based education. Baseline and post- intervention anxiety were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). Anesthesia preference and satisfaction were also recorded.

Results

Spinal anesthesia was initially preferred by 36% of participants. After receiving preoperative information, this rate increased to 73%. Among those who had initially preferred general anesthesia, 58.33% changed their choice. Preference change rates varied by information type: 43.33% following verbal information, 72.22% following graphic illustration information, and 56.67% with video-based information. Significant reductions were observed in both STAI and VAS-A scores across all groups (P <0.005). High satisfaction was reported by most participants, including those who changed their preference.

Conclusion

Preoperative education significantly reduced anxiety and influenced anesthesia preference (changing from general to spinal anesthesia) for elective cesarean delivery. Graphic illustration were the most effective in promoting a change in preference in favor of spinal anesthesia. Integrating structured, visual educational tools into preoperative counseling may support informed maternal decision-making and improve perioperative experience.
在一项土耳其剖宫产妇女队列中,不同信息方法对患者焦虑和脊柱麻醉与全身麻醉偏好的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景术前焦虑和对脊髓麻醉的误解经常影响剖宫产手术的麻醉选择。患者教育可以改善焦虑和知情决策。方法在这项前瞻性观察研究中,300名计划择期剖宫产的孕妇接受了三种术前信息方法中的一种:口头解释、图片说明或视频教育。使用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)和焦虑视觉模拟量表(VAS-A)评估基线和干预后焦虑。同时记录麻醉偏好和满意度。结果36%的参与者首选脊髓麻醉。在获得术前信息后,这一比例增加到73%。在最初选择全麻的患者中,58.33%的人改变了选择。不同信息类型的偏好变化率不同,口头信息的偏好变化率为43.33%,图形说明信息的偏好变化率为72.22%,视频信息的偏好变化率为56.67%。所有组的STAI和VAS-A评分均显著降低(P <0.005)。大多数参与者都表示非常满意,包括那些改变了偏好的人。结论术前教育可显著降低择期剖宫产患者的焦虑感,影响麻醉偏好(由全身麻醉转为脊髓麻醉)。图形说明是最有效的促进偏好的改变,有利于脊髓麻醉。将结构化、可视化的教育工具整合到术前咨询中,可以帮助产妇做出明智的决策,并改善围手术期的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信