Eun Hak Lee , Jolanda Prozzi , P. Grace Tee Lewis , Maia Draper , Bumsik Kim
{"title":"From scores to strategy: Performance-based transportation planning in Texas","authors":"Eun Hak Lee , Jolanda Prozzi , P. Grace Tee Lewis , Maia Draper , Bumsik Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rise of advanced mobility data collection technologies, there has been growing interest in performance-based planning and programming. As a result, transportation agencies are increasingly using multiple metrics to evaluate system performance. However, relying on multiple indicators can complicate decision-making, highlighting the need for a single, consolidated performance score. This study evaluates the performance of the transportation system in Texas using a data envelopment analysis model. The analysis incorporates six performance metrics aligned with five planning goals outlined in Texas Unified Transportation Program. The decision-making unit was set as census tracts, and the transportation score was defined as the relative performance of the six metrics in comparison to population and land area. The results showed that the transportation score across 5265 census tracts was estimated to be 0.52 on average. This suggests that an average improvement of 0.48 is needed across census tracts to reach the optimal transportation score of 1.00. Additionally, the impact of six metrics on estimated transportation score was identified using the Tobit regression model. The proposed framework contributes to the transportation planning process by combining multiple metrics into a single score and providing both performance rankings and actionable insights for system improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the rise of advanced mobility data collection technologies, there has been growing interest in performance-based planning and programming. As a result, transportation agencies are increasingly using multiple metrics to evaluate system performance. However, relying on multiple indicators can complicate decision-making, highlighting the need for a single, consolidated performance score. This study evaluates the performance of the transportation system in Texas using a data envelopment analysis model. The analysis incorporates six performance metrics aligned with five planning goals outlined in Texas Unified Transportation Program. The decision-making unit was set as census tracts, and the transportation score was defined as the relative performance of the six metrics in comparison to population and land area. The results showed that the transportation score across 5265 census tracts was estimated to be 0.52 on average. This suggests that an average improvement of 0.48 is needed across census tracts to reach the optimal transportation score of 1.00. Additionally, the impact of six metrics on estimated transportation score was identified using the Tobit regression model. The proposed framework contributes to the transportation planning process by combining multiple metrics into a single score and providing both performance rankings and actionable insights for system improvement.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.