A Principle-Based Concept Analysis of Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Amy B Thomas, Catherine R Van Son, Lonnie A Nelson, Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Celestina Barbosa-Leiker
{"title":"A Principle-Based Concept Analysis of Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia.","authors":"Amy B Thomas, Catherine R Van Son, Lonnie A Nelson, Gerasimos Fergadiotis, Celestina Barbosa-Leiker","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> <i>Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia</i> (<i>SCA<sup>™</sup></i> ), an evidence-based framework to improve communicative access, is a unique concept to nursing with theoretical and technical components. Effective communication is essential in all patient interactions, and SCA™ could aid health care professionals in meeting the needs of people with aphasia. <b>Methods:</b> A principle-based concept analysis was conducted using a systematic and conceptually driven literature search. A review of literature from 1998 to 2024 contained in CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases was performed on the concept of SCA<sup>™</sup> The concept was explored for (a) definitional clarity (epistemological principle), (b) relevance to nursing (pragmatic principle), (c) consistency in meaning (linguistic principle), and (d) differentiation from related concepts (logical principle). <b>Results:</b> The final dataset consisted of 49 articles. Findings revealed that (a) SCA<sup>™</sup> is composed of theoretical and technical components used to acknowledge and reveal the competence of a person with aphasia, but there is a vague use and a lack of definitional clarity; (b) the philosophical framework and techniques outlined by the concept are relevant and useful for nursing; (c) there is variability in the use, nomenclature, and conceptualization of SCA<sup>™</sup>; and (d) the concept is poorly differentiated from other similar concepts. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> Nurses working with people diagnosed with aphasia and other communication disorders should consider SCA<sup>™</sup> and its application in nursing practice. Findings from this concept analysis stress the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to future SCA<sup>™</sup> studies, as nursing can lend its distinct viewpoint to integrate SCA<sup>™</sup> techniques into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia (SCA ), an evidence-based framework to improve communicative access, is a unique concept to nursing with theoretical and technical components. Effective communication is essential in all patient interactions, and SCA™ could aid health care professionals in meeting the needs of people with aphasia. Methods: A principle-based concept analysis was conducted using a systematic and conceptually driven literature search. A review of literature from 1998 to 2024 contained in CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases was performed on the concept of SCA The concept was explored for (a) definitional clarity (epistemological principle), (b) relevance to nursing (pragmatic principle), (c) consistency in meaning (linguistic principle), and (d) differentiation from related concepts (logical principle). Results: The final dataset consisted of 49 articles. Findings revealed that (a) SCA is composed of theoretical and technical components used to acknowledge and reveal the competence of a person with aphasia, but there is a vague use and a lack of definitional clarity; (b) the philosophical framework and techniques outlined by the concept are relevant and useful for nursing; (c) there is variability in the use, nomenclature, and conceptualization of SCA; and (d) the concept is poorly differentiated from other similar concepts. Implications for Practice: Nurses working with people diagnosed with aphasia and other communication disorders should consider SCA and its application in nursing practice. Findings from this concept analysis stress the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to future SCA studies, as nursing can lend its distinct viewpoint to integrate SCA techniques into practice.

基于原则的成人失语支持对话概念分析。
背景和目的:成人失语症患者支持对话(SCA™)是一个以证据为基础的框架,旨在改善交流途径,是一个独特的护理概念,具有理论和技术成分。在所有患者互动中,有效的沟通是必不可少的,SCA™可以帮助医疗保健专业人员满足失语症患者的需求。方法:通过系统的、概念驱动的文献检索,进行基于原则的概念分析。对1998年至2024年CINAHL、PubMed和PsycINFO数据库中包含的SCA™概念进行了文献回顾,探讨了SCA™概念(A)定义的清晰度(认识论原则),(b)与护理的相关性(语用原则),(c)意义的一致性(语言原则),以及(d)与相关概念的区别(逻辑原则)。结果:最终数据集包括49篇文章。研究结果显示:(a) SCA™由理论和技术组成,用于确认和揭示失语症患者的能力,但使用模糊且定义不明确;(b)概念所概述的哲学框架和技术与护理相关和有用;(c) SCA™的使用、命名和概念化存在可变性;(d)该概念与其他类似概念区分不清。对实践的启示:护理失语和其他沟通障碍患者的护士应该考虑SCA™及其在护理实践中的应用。这个概念分析的结果强调了跨学科方法对未来SCA™研究的重要性,因为护理可以提供其独特的观点来将SCA™技术整合到实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信