Complications of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis Are Similar to Those of Corticosteroids and Hyaluronic Acid but Are Significantly Greater Than Those of Placebo Injections: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Stephen P Fucaloro, Jack Bragg, Makeda Berhane, Meghan Mulvey, Laura Krivicich, Thomas Zink, Matthew Salzler
{"title":"Complications of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis Are Similar to Those of Corticosteroids and Hyaluronic Acid but Are Significantly Greater Than Those of Placebo Injections: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Stephen P Fucaloro, Jack Bragg, Makeda Berhane, Meghan Mulvey, Laura Krivicich, Thomas Zink, Matthew Salzler","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate complications of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with other injected substances including hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroids, and placebo saline solution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PRP with another injectable treatment for knee OA with documented complications. Studies not mentioning complications or using PRP during surgery were excluded. Complications were pooled to determine the overall complication rate and the number needed to harm (NNH). Subgroup analyses were performed for studies comparing PRP with HA, corticosteroids, and placebo saline solution using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models displaying odds ratios (ORs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four RCTs were identified, with 2,751 total patients, 1,318 of whom received PRP injections. A total of 246 complications occurred in the PRP group versus 131 in the comparison cohort (18.66% vs 9.14%, P < .01). The NNH was 11. Subgroup analysis showed no difference in the odds of complications when PRP was compared with HA (OR = 1.33, P = .22, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and corticosteroids (OR = 3.07, P = .35, I<sup>2</sup> = 63.49%) but showed significantly more complications when compared with placebo (OR = 4.88, P < .01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00%). Only 1 patient reported severe pain; all other complications were described as moderate or mild and self-limiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of PRP for knee OA is not innocuous, with a significantly higher rate of complications compared with placebo. However, most complications were reported as mild to moderate, and the odds of complications are similar to those of HA or corticosteroid injections. Compared with all other injectables, the NNH for PRP is 11, which is important for physicians to consider prior to PRP therapy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate complications of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with other injected substances including hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroids, and placebo saline solution.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PRP with another injectable treatment for knee OA with documented complications. Studies not mentioning complications or using PRP during surgery were excluded. Complications were pooled to determine the overall complication rate and the number needed to harm (NNH). Subgroup analyses were performed for studies comparing PRP with HA, corticosteroids, and placebo saline solution using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models displaying odds ratios (ORs).
Results: Twenty-four RCTs were identified, with 2,751 total patients, 1,318 of whom received PRP injections. A total of 246 complications occurred in the PRP group versus 131 in the comparison cohort (18.66% vs 9.14%, P < .01). The NNH was 11. Subgroup analysis showed no difference in the odds of complications when PRP was compared with HA (OR = 1.33, P = .22, I2 = 0.0%) and corticosteroids (OR = 3.07, P = .35, I2 = 63.49%) but showed significantly more complications when compared with placebo (OR = 4.88, P < .01, I2 = 0.00%). Only 1 patient reported severe pain; all other complications were described as moderate or mild and self-limiting.
Conclusions: The use of PRP for knee OA is not innocuous, with a significantly higher rate of complications compared with placebo. However, most complications were reported as mild to moderate, and the odds of complications are similar to those of HA or corticosteroid injections. Compared with all other injectables, the NNH for PRP is 11, which is important for physicians to consider prior to PRP therapy.
Level of evidence: Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II RCTs.
期刊介绍：
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
