Cross-National Evidence on Risk of Death Associated with Loneliness: A Survival Analysis of 1-Year All-Cause Mortality among Older Adult Home Care Recipients in Canada, Finland, and Aotearoa | New Zealand

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Bonaventure A. Egbujie PhD , Gustavo Betini PhD , Sandra Ochwat MSc , Reem T. Mulla PhD , Jokke Häsä PhD , Johanna Edgren PhD , Mari Aaltonen PhD , Irihapeti Bullmore RN , Gary Cheung PhD , Hamish A. Jamieson PhD , Philip Schluter PhD , John P. Hirdes PhD
{"title":"Cross-National Evidence on Risk of Death Associated with Loneliness: A Survival Analysis of 1-Year All-Cause Mortality among Older Adult Home Care Recipients in Canada, Finland, and Aotearoa | New Zealand","authors":"Bonaventure A. Egbujie PhD ,&nbsp;Gustavo Betini PhD ,&nbsp;Sandra Ochwat MSc ,&nbsp;Reem T. Mulla PhD ,&nbsp;Jokke Häsä PhD ,&nbsp;Johanna Edgren PhD ,&nbsp;Mari Aaltonen PhD ,&nbsp;Irihapeti Bullmore RN ,&nbsp;Gary Cheung PhD ,&nbsp;Hamish A. Jamieson PhD ,&nbsp;Philip Schluter PhD ,&nbsp;John P. Hirdes PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine all-cause 1-year risk of mortality associated with loneliness for home care recipients after adjusting for potential confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Survival analyses with parallel designs using interRAI Home Care assessments and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Settings and Participants</h3><div>Home care recipients in 3 countries—Canada, Finland, and Aotearoa | New Zealand (ANZ)—who were 65 years and older were selected for this retrospective analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We fit a multivariable Cox regression model to obtain the adjusted proportional hazards of 1-year mortality among home care recipients for each of the 3 countries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 178,610, 35,073, and 169,703 home care recipients in Canada, Finland, and ANZ respectively, were included in the study. The respective baseline rates of loneliness in the 3 countries were 15.9%, 20.5%, and 24.4% of recipients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, being lonely was independently associated with a lower likelihood of mortality among home care recipients, with hazard ratios of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) in Canada, 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in Finland, and 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81) in ANZ.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Loneliness is pervasive in home care settings across the 3 countries; however, its association with mortality differs from reports for the general population. Loneliness was not associated with an increased risk of death after adjusting for health-related covariates. The causal order between changes in health, loneliness, and mortality is unclear. For example, loneliness may be a consequence of those health changes rather than their cause. Hence, temporal order needs better delineation. Health care systems should treat loneliness as an important mental health priority irrespective of a possible relationship with physical health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 7","pages":"Article 105687"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152586102500204X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine all-cause 1-year risk of mortality associated with loneliness for home care recipients after adjusting for potential confounders.

Design

Survival analyses with parallel designs using interRAI Home Care assessments and mortality.

Settings and Participants

Home care recipients in 3 countries—Canada, Finland, and Aotearoa | New Zealand (ANZ)—who were 65 years and older were selected for this retrospective analysis.

Methods

We fit a multivariable Cox regression model to obtain the adjusted proportional hazards of 1-year mortality among home care recipients for each of the 3 countries.

Results

A total of 178,610, 35,073, and 169,703 home care recipients in Canada, Finland, and ANZ respectively, were included in the study. The respective baseline rates of loneliness in the 3 countries were 15.9%, 20.5%, and 24.4% of recipients. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, being lonely was independently associated with a lower likelihood of mortality among home care recipients, with hazard ratios of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) in Canada, 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in Finland, and 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81) in ANZ.

Conclusions and Implications

Loneliness is pervasive in home care settings across the 3 countries; however, its association with mortality differs from reports for the general population. Loneliness was not associated with an increased risk of death after adjusting for health-related covariates. The causal order between changes in health, loneliness, and mortality is unclear. For example, loneliness may be a consequence of those health changes rather than their cause. Hence, temporal order needs better delineation. Health care systems should treat loneliness as an important mental health priority irrespective of a possible relationship with physical health.
与孤独相关的死亡风险的跨国证据:加拿大、芬兰和新西兰老年家庭护理接受者1年全因死亡率的生存分析。
目的在调整潜在混杂因素后,检查与家庭护理接受者孤独感相关的全因1年死亡风险。采用interRAI家庭护理评估和死亡率的平行设计进行生存分析。背景和参与者:来自加拿大、芬兰和新西兰(ANZ) 3个国家的65岁及以上的家庭护理接受者被选为回顾性分析对象。方法采用多变量Cox回归模型拟合3个国家家庭护理对象1年死亡率的调整比例风险。结果加拿大、芬兰和澳新银行的家庭护理对象分别为178,610人、35,073人和169,703人。这三个国家的孤独基线率分别为15.9%、20.5%和24.4%。在多变量Cox回归分析中,孤独与家庭护理接受者较低的死亡率独立相关,加拿大的风险比为0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86),芬兰的风险比为0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), ANZ的风险比为0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81)。结论和意义孤独在这三个国家的家庭护理环境中普遍存在;然而,其与死亡率的关系与一般人群的报告不同。在调整健康相关协变量后,孤独与死亡风险增加无关。健康状况、孤独感和死亡率变化之间的因果关系尚不清楚。例如,孤独可能是这些健康变化的结果,而不是原因。因此,时间顺序需要更好地描述。卫生保健系统应将孤独视为重要的心理健康优先事项,而不考虑其与身体健康的可能关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信