Diagnostic Precision in Lumbar Radiculopathy: Impact of Transitional Vertebrae on Treatment Level Selection and Outcomes.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf061
Bart Liebrand, Selina van der Wal, Marjan Slob, Arthur Boon, Dylan Henssen, JanVan Zundert, Walter van der Weegen, Kris Vissers
{"title":"Diagnostic Precision in Lumbar Radiculopathy: Impact of Transitional Vertebrae on Treatment Level Selection and Outcomes.","authors":"Bart Liebrand, Selina van der Wal, Marjan Slob, Arthur Boon, Dylan Henssen, JanVan Zundert, Walter van der Weegen, Kris Vissers","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, discrepancies indetermining the correct vertebral level of lumboradicular pain occur. This study evaluates the consequences of the real-world diagnostic process and subsequent treatment differences due to misidentified levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used prospectively collected data on involved spinal levels (February 2016 - October 2022) reported in the referrals, MRI- and treatment reports. Variables analyzed included the number of referrals, consultations, invasive treatments, duration of treatment, radiographs, operations, and hospitalization. Independent clinical researchers conducted vertebral counting, transitional vertebra classification, and wrong level determination using standard methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 4184 patientsassessed, 214included patients (5.1%) with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae were divided intothree groups: Correct level determination (72), wrong level determination (36) andambiguous level diagnosis(106).Theambiguous levelgroup had more consultations, interventional treatments, radiographic diagnostics, longer treatment duration and more referrals to other hospitals (p < 0.04) at the pain management department and significantly less consultations of other specialisms (p 0.01-0.02) compared to the other groups due to uncertain level diagnosis. Discrepancies between reported MRI- and treatment levels in the records increased the chance for wrong level treatment (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and lumboradicular pain, discrepancies between referral, MRI, and treatment levels are common, leading to uncertain diagnoses and treatment due to incorrect leveldetermination. Interdisciplinary consultation to reach consensus on the most appropriate spinal level for treatment and clear spine images may prevent such discrepancies. Amulticentre study with a larger patient sample is strongly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, discrepancies indetermining the correct vertebral level of lumboradicular pain occur. This study evaluates the consequences of the real-world diagnostic process and subsequent treatment differences due to misidentified levels.

Methods: This retrospective analysis used prospectively collected data on involved spinal levels (February 2016 - October 2022) reported in the referrals, MRI- and treatment reports. Variables analyzed included the number of referrals, consultations, invasive treatments, duration of treatment, radiographs, operations, and hospitalization. Independent clinical researchers conducted vertebral counting, transitional vertebra classification, and wrong level determination using standard methods.

Results: Of a total of 4184 patientsassessed, 214included patients (5.1%) with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae were divided intothree groups: Correct level determination (72), wrong level determination (36) andambiguous level diagnosis(106).Theambiguous levelgroup had more consultations, interventional treatments, radiographic diagnostics, longer treatment duration and more referrals to other hospitals (p < 0.04) at the pain management department and significantly less consultations of other specialisms (p 0.01-0.02) compared to the other groups due to uncertain level diagnosis. Discrepancies between reported MRI- and treatment levels in the records increased the chance for wrong level treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and lumboradicular pain, discrepancies between referral, MRI, and treatment levels are common, leading to uncertain diagnoses and treatment due to incorrect leveldetermination. Interdisciplinary consultation to reach consensus on the most appropriate spinal level for treatment and clear spine images may prevent such discrepancies. Amulticentre study with a larger patient sample is strongly recommended.

腰椎神经根病的诊断精度:移行椎体对治疗水平选择和结果的影响。
背景:在腰骶段过渡性椎体患者中,确定腰根疼痛的正确椎体水平存在差异。本研究评估了真实世界诊断过程的后果,以及由于错误识别水平而导致的后续治疗差异。方法:回顾性分析前瞻性收集了转诊、MRI和治疗报告中涉及的脊柱水平(2016年2月至2022年10月)的数据。分析的变量包括转诊次数、咨询、侵入性治疗、治疗持续时间、x光片、手术和住院。独立临床研究人员使用标准方法进行椎体计数、过渡性椎体分类和错误水平测定。结果:在共4184例患者中,214例(5.1%)腰骶过渡椎体患者分为三组:水平确定正确(72例),水平确定错误(36例)和水平诊断不明确(106例)。水平模糊组就诊、介入治疗、影像学诊断较多,治疗时间较长,转诊率较高(p结论:腰骶段过渡性椎体及腰根疼痛患者,转诊、MRI及治疗水平差异普遍,因水平不正确导致诊断和治疗不确定。跨学科会诊以达成共识的最合适的脊柱治疗水平和清晰的脊柱图像可以防止这种差异。强烈建议采用更大患者样本的多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信