Effectiveness of hypotension prediction index software in reducing intraoperative hypotension in prolonged prone-position spine surgery: a single-center clinical trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Myrto A Pilakouta Depaskouale, Stela A Archonta, Sofia Κ Moutafidou, Nikolaos A Paidakakos, Antonia N Dimakopoulou, Paraskevi K Matsota
{"title":"Effectiveness of hypotension prediction index software in reducing intraoperative hypotension in prolonged prone-position spine surgery: a single-center clinical trial.","authors":"Myrto A Pilakouta Depaskouale, Stela A Archonta, Sofia Κ Moutafidou, Nikolaos A Paidakakos, Antonia N Dimakopoulou, Paraskevi K Matsota","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01303-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with morbidity and mortality. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), a machine learning-based tool, offers the opportunity for a proactive approach by predicting hypotensive events. This single center, single blind randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that an HPI software-guided approach to IOH management during prone position spine surgery could reduce its incidence compared to our standard care practices. 85 adult patients undergoing spine fusion surgery in the prone position were enrolled. Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants were blinded to their group allocation. In the intervention group, the HPI software was actively used to guide IOH management. In the control group, HPI software readings were blinded, and standard care was administered. The primary outcome was the comparison of time-weighted average (TWA) of IOH between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the incidence of postoperative in-hospital events related to IOH between groups. 77 patients were included in the final analysis (39 in the intervention group), as 8 patients were excluded due to technical issues. No statistically significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in the TWA of IOH (0.10 mmHg [0.05, 0.23] vs. 0.15 mmHg [0.09, 0.37], p-value 0.088). However, the total duration of hypotensive events per patient was significantly lower in the intervention group (4 min [0.5, 12.2] vs. 11.2 min [2.6, 20.1]; p-value 0.019). Postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. HPI-guided management did not significantly reduce the TWA of IOH compared to standard care in patients undergoing prone-position spine surgery. Complication rates were similar between the two groups.Clinical Trial Registration: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05341167).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"875-887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01303-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with morbidity and mortality. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), a machine learning-based tool, offers the opportunity for a proactive approach by predicting hypotensive events. This single center, single blind randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that an HPI software-guided approach to IOH management during prone position spine surgery could reduce its incidence compared to our standard care practices. 85 adult patients undergoing spine fusion surgery in the prone position were enrolled. Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants were blinded to their group allocation. In the intervention group, the HPI software was actively used to guide IOH management. In the control group, HPI software readings were blinded, and standard care was administered. The primary outcome was the comparison of time-weighted average (TWA) of IOH between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the incidence of postoperative in-hospital events related to IOH between groups. 77 patients were included in the final analysis (39 in the intervention group), as 8 patients were excluded due to technical issues. No statistically significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in the TWA of IOH (0.10 mmHg [0.05, 0.23] vs. 0.15 mmHg [0.09, 0.37], p-value 0.088). However, the total duration of hypotensive events per patient was significantly lower in the intervention group (4 min [0.5, 12.2] vs. 11.2 min [2.6, 20.1]; p-value 0.019). Postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. HPI-guided management did not significantly reduce the TWA of IOH compared to standard care in patients undergoing prone-position spine surgery. Complication rates were similar between the two groups.Clinical Trial Registration: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05341167).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低血压预测指数软件降低长时间俯卧位脊柱手术术中低血压的有效性:一项单中心临床试验。
术中低血压(IOH)与发病率和死亡率相关。低血压预测指数(HPI)是一种基于机器学习的工具,通过预测低血压事件,为前瞻性方法提供了机会。本单中心、单盲随机临床试验旨在评估在俯卧位脊柱手术中采用HPI软件引导的IOH管理方法与标准护理方法相比可以降低IOH发生率的假设。85名接受脊柱融合手术的俯卧位成人患者被纳入研究。患者按1:1的分配比例随机化。参与者不知道他们的分组分配。干预组积极应用HPI软件指导IOH管理。在对照组中,HPI软件读数是盲法的,并给予标准护理。主要观察指标为两组间IOH时间加权平均值(TWA)的比较。次要结局包括组间与IOH相关的术后住院事件发生率的比较。77例患者纳入最终分析(干预组39例),8例患者因技术问题被排除。干预组与对照组IOH TWA差异无统计学意义(0.10 mmHg [0.05, 0.23] vs. 0.15 mmHg [0.09, 0.37], p值0.088)。然而,干预组每位患者的降压事件总持续时间明显较低(4分钟[0.5,12.2]vs. 11.2分钟[2.6,20.1];假定值0.019)。两组术后并发症发生率无明显差异。与标准治疗相比,hpi引导下的治疗并没有显著降低俯卧位脊柱手术患者IOH的TWA。两组的并发症发生率相似。临床试验注册:本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(注册号:NCT05341167)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信