Impact of skilled nursing facility discharge on inpatient oncology quality outcomes.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Bonnie E Gould Rothberg, Jensa C Morris
{"title":"Impact of skilled nursing facility discharge on inpatient oncology quality outcomes.","authors":"Bonnie E Gould Rothberg, Jensa C Morris","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalist co-management of inpatient oncology patients can improve length of stay (LOS), discharge time and readmission rates. Identifying additional clinical factors affecting LOS and readmissions will guide further oncology hospitalist practice improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalizations on the Smilow Cancer Hospital medical oncology service with discharge to home under self-care (n = 622), home with services (n = 462) or skilled nursing facility (SNF; n = 152) from 07/01/2021-07/31/2022 were included. Outcomes included LOS, time of discharge and 30-day readmission rate. Multivariable mixed linear (LOS, time of discharge) or Poisson (30-day readmission rates) models were adjusted for demographics, cancer type, severity of illness index, housestaff team and fiscal quarter and included a random intercept for patient. Analyses were two-sided with a priori significance of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients discharged to SNF had a longer LOS (8.25 days (7.13 days, 9.55 days)) compared to patients discharged to home under self-care (3.04 days (2.76 days, 3.36 days)) or with services (4.48 days (4.03 days, 4.97 days)) (p < .0001). 30-day readmission rates for patients discharged to SNF (43.99%) were 10 percentage points higher than those discharged home either under self-care (32.86%) or with services (33.48%) (p = .14). These differences persisted in patients regardless of severity of illness index. Of the 152 patients discharged to SNF, 31 (20.3%) were readmitted specifically back to the medical oncology service within 60 days with 16 (51.6%) cycling back to SNF which resulted in 11 second readmissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>For oncology patients requiring discharge to SNF, mindful and upfront discharge planning may improve care quality and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalist co-management of inpatient oncology patients can improve length of stay (LOS), discharge time and readmission rates. Identifying additional clinical factors affecting LOS and readmissions will guide further oncology hospitalist practice improvement.

Methods: Hospitalizations on the Smilow Cancer Hospital medical oncology service with discharge to home under self-care (n = 622), home with services (n = 462) or skilled nursing facility (SNF; n = 152) from 07/01/2021-07/31/2022 were included. Outcomes included LOS, time of discharge and 30-day readmission rate. Multivariable mixed linear (LOS, time of discharge) or Poisson (30-day readmission rates) models were adjusted for demographics, cancer type, severity of illness index, housestaff team and fiscal quarter and included a random intercept for patient. Analyses were two-sided with a priori significance of < 0.05.

Results: Patients discharged to SNF had a longer LOS (8.25 days (7.13 days, 9.55 days)) compared to patients discharged to home under self-care (3.04 days (2.76 days, 3.36 days)) or with services (4.48 days (4.03 days, 4.97 days)) (p < .0001). 30-day readmission rates for patients discharged to SNF (43.99%) were 10 percentage points higher than those discharged home either under self-care (32.86%) or with services (33.48%) (p = .14). These differences persisted in patients regardless of severity of illness index. Of the 152 patients discharged to SNF, 31 (20.3%) were readmitted specifically back to the medical oncology service within 60 days with 16 (51.6%) cycling back to SNF which resulted in 11 second readmissions.

Conclusions and relevance: For oncology patients requiring discharge to SNF, mindful and upfront discharge planning may improve care quality and efficiency.

熟练护理机构出院对住院肿瘤患者质量结果的影响。
背景:住院肿瘤患者的住院医师共同管理可以改善住院时间(LOS)、出院时间和再入院率。确定影响LOS和再入院的其他临床因素将进一步指导肿瘤医院医生的实践改进。方法:在Smilow肿瘤医院内科肿瘤科住院的患者,出院在家自理(n = 622)、在家服务(n = 462)或熟练护理机构(SNF);N = 152),分别来自2021年1月7日至2022年7月31日。结果包括LOS、出院时间和30天再入院率。多变量混合线性(LOS,出院时间)或泊松(30天再入院率)模型根据人口统计学、癌症类型、疾病严重程度指数、家政人员团队和财政季度进行调整,并包括患者的随机截点。结果:与自我护理(3.04天(2.76天,3.36天)或服务(4.48天(4.03天,4.97天))出院的患者相比,出院到SNF的患者有更长的LOS(8.25天(7.13天,9.55天))(p结论及相关性:对于需要出院到SNF的肿瘤患者,积极和预先的出院计划可以提高护理质量和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信