Deep Dutta, Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Lakshmi Nagendra, Abm Kamrul-Hasan
{"title":"One-hour vs Two-hour Postprandial Glucose Targets and Fetomaternal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Deep Dutta, Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Lakshmi Nagendra, Abm Kamrul-Hasan","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2025.05.741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal time and target for postprandial glucose (PPG) measurement in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether targeting 1-hour PPG (1 hPG) vs 2-hour PPG (2 hPG) altered fetomaternal outcomes in GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies that compared pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing 1 hPG vs 2 hPG monitoring in GDM were identified through comprehensive search of electronic databases. Primary outcomes analyzed were large-for-gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia. Secondary outcomes included low birthweight (LBW), neonatal intensive-care unit admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, cesarean section (CS), pre-eclampsia, gestational age at delivery, and preterm delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles that compared 1 hPG<140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) vs 2 hPG <120 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) were analyzed. Additionally, 3 articles that assessed 1 hPG<120 mg/dL vs1 hPG<140 mg/dL were also examined. Targeting 1 hPG<140 mg/dL vs 2 hPG<120 mg/dL significantly lowered the risk of LGA [odds ratio (OR) 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.93; P = .03] but not macrosomia [OR 0.45; 95%CI:0.19-1.06; P = .07]. There was no difference in other parameters such as birthweight [mean difference -61.77g; 95%CI:-152.16-28.62; P = .018], LBW [OR 0.90; 95%CI:0.30-2.68;P = .85], neonatal hypoglycemia [OR 0.60; 95%CI:0.28-1.26; P = .18], gestational age at delivery [mean difference 0.20 weeks; 95%CI:-0.29-0.68; P = .43], CS [OR 0.99; 95%CI:0.46-2.12;P = .97], pre-eclampsia [OR 0.66;95% CI:.22-1.96; P = .46], or need for insulin therapy [OR 1.39; 95%CI:.79-2.43; P = .25]. More intensive 1 hPG target <120 mg/dL vs <140 mg/dl increased the risk of preterm delivery [OR 1.62; 95% CI:1.00-2.62; P = .05], without affecting birthweight, LGA, macrosomia, LBW, and CS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that targeting 1 hPG <140 mg/dL vs 2 hPG<120 mg/dL lowers the risk of LGA, but does not affect other parameters. A stricter target of 1 hPG<120 mg/dL can increase the risk of preterm delivery. Further studies to corroborate these findings are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2025.05.741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The optimal time and target for postprandial glucose (PPG) measurement in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether targeting 1-hour PPG (1 hPG) vs 2-hour PPG (2 hPG) altered fetomaternal outcomes in GDM.
Methods: Studies that compared pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing 1 hPG vs 2 hPG monitoring in GDM were identified through comprehensive search of electronic databases. Primary outcomes analyzed were large-for-gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia. Secondary outcomes included low birthweight (LBW), neonatal intensive-care unit admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, cesarean section (CS), pre-eclampsia, gestational age at delivery, and preterm delivery.
Results: Six articles that compared 1 hPG<140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) vs 2 hPG <120 mg/dL (7.2 mmol/L) were analyzed. Additionally, 3 articles that assessed 1 hPG<120 mg/dL vs1 hPG<140 mg/dL were also examined. Targeting 1 hPG<140 mg/dL vs 2 hPG<120 mg/dL significantly lowered the risk of LGA [odds ratio (OR) 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.93; P = .03] but not macrosomia [OR 0.45; 95%CI:0.19-1.06; P = .07]. There was no difference in other parameters such as birthweight [mean difference -61.77g; 95%CI:-152.16-28.62; P = .018], LBW [OR 0.90; 95%CI:0.30-2.68;P = .85], neonatal hypoglycemia [OR 0.60; 95%CI:0.28-1.26; P = .18], gestational age at delivery [mean difference 0.20 weeks; 95%CI:-0.29-0.68; P = .43], CS [OR 0.99; 95%CI:0.46-2.12;P = .97], pre-eclampsia [OR 0.66;95% CI:.22-1.96; P = .46], or need for insulin therapy [OR 1.39; 95%CI:.79-2.43; P = .25]. More intensive 1 hPG target <120 mg/dL vs <140 mg/dl increased the risk of preterm delivery [OR 1.62; 95% CI:1.00-2.62; P = .05], without affecting birthweight, LGA, macrosomia, LBW, and CS.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that targeting 1 hPG <140 mg/dL vs 2 hPG<120 mg/dL lowers the risk of LGA, but does not affect other parameters. A stricter target of 1 hPG<120 mg/dL can increase the risk of preterm delivery. Further studies to corroborate these findings are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.