Swimming emissions from dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid: Assessing the environmental risk.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Record Pub Date : 2025-05-31 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.1002/vetr.5560
Rosemary Perkins, Gaëtan Glauser, Dave Goulson
{"title":"Swimming emissions from dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid: Assessing the environmental risk.","authors":"Rosemary Perkins, Gaëtan Glauser, Dave Goulson","doi":"10.1002/vetr.5560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fipronil and imidacloprid are increasingly recognised as contaminants of concern in aquatic environments. This study aimed to quantify swimming emissions from dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid, assess the associated environmental risks and evaluate whether current label instructions on swimming restrictions are adequate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Emissions from swimming were measured for 49 dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid on days 5, 14 or 28 post-application. The environmental risk was assessed by calculating risk quotients, dividing the predicted environmental concentrations by the predicted no-effect concentrations for freshwater ecosystems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean washoff ranged from 4% to 0.4% of the applied dose for fipronil and 10% to 1.4% for imidacloprid across the 5-28-day period. Risk quotients indicate a risk to aquatic ecosystems throughout the products' duration of action.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The results may underestimate emissions for fipronil, as swimming is permitted from 3 days post-application and measurements began on day 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights clear ecological risks from spot-on parasiticides and provides evidence that current label instructions on swimming do not provide sufficient environmental protection. Risk-based parasite control strategies and extended swimming restrictions are recommended. Regulatory review of environmental risk assessments and mitigation measures is warranted to protect aquatic environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23560,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record","volume":" ","pages":"e5560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fipronil and imidacloprid are increasingly recognised as contaminants of concern in aquatic environments. This study aimed to quantify swimming emissions from dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid, assess the associated environmental risks and evaluate whether current label instructions on swimming restrictions are adequate.

Methods: Emissions from swimming were measured for 49 dogs treated with spot-on fipronil or imidacloprid on days 5, 14 or 28 post-application. The environmental risk was assessed by calculating risk quotients, dividing the predicted environmental concentrations by the predicted no-effect concentrations for freshwater ecosystems.

Results: Mean washoff ranged from 4% to 0.4% of the applied dose for fipronil and 10% to 1.4% for imidacloprid across the 5-28-day period. Risk quotients indicate a risk to aquatic ecosystems throughout the products' duration of action.

Limitations: The results may underestimate emissions for fipronil, as swimming is permitted from 3 days post-application and measurements began on day 5.

Conclusion: This study highlights clear ecological risks from spot-on parasiticides and provides evidence that current label instructions on swimming do not provide sufficient environmental protection. Risk-based parasite control strategies and extended swimming restrictions are recommended. Regulatory review of environmental risk assessments and mitigation measures is warranted to protect aquatic environments.

用氟虫腈或吡虫啉治疗狗的游泳排放物:评估环境风险。
背景:氟虫腈和吡虫啉越来越被认为是水生环境中令人关注的污染物。本研究旨在量化使用氟虫腈或吡虫啉治疗的狗的游泳排放物,评估相关的环境风险,并评估当前标签上关于游泳限制的说明是否足够。方法:对49只经氟虫腈或吡虫啉点涂后第5、14、28天的狗进行游泳排放物测定。通过计算风险商来评估环境风险,将预测的环境浓度除以预测的淡水生态系统无影响浓度。结果:5-28天期间,氟虫腈和吡虫啉的平均washoff值分别为4% - 0.4%和10% - 1.4%。风险商数表明产品在整个作用期间对水生生态系统的风险。限制:结果可能低估了氟虫腈的排放量,因为使用后3天允许游泳,第5天开始测量。结论:本研究强调了现场杀寄生虫剂的生态风险,并提供了现行游泳标签说明没有提供足够的环境保护的证据。建议采取基于风险的寄生虫控制策略和延长游泳限制。有必要对环境风险评估和缓解措施进行监管审查,以保护水生环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Record
Veterinary Record 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record (branded as Vet Record) is the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and has been published weekly since 1888. It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals. It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信