Association of Pregnancy-Adjusted Sepsis Screening Criteria with Risk of Maternal Infectious Morbidity in the Setting of Intrapartum Intraamniotic Infection.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kathryn Ruymann, Eshika Agarwal, Martinique Ogle, Huda B Al-Kouatly, Rupsa C Boelig
{"title":"Association of Pregnancy-Adjusted Sepsis Screening Criteria with Risk of Maternal Infectious Morbidity in the Setting of Intrapartum Intraamniotic Infection.","authors":"Kathryn Ruymann, Eshika Agarwal, Martinique Ogle, Huda B Al-Kouatly, Rupsa C Boelig","doi":"10.1055/a-2599-4813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) developed a pregnancy-adjusted sepsis screen that includes temperature ≥100.4°F, heart rate > 110 bpm, respiratory rate > 24 bpm, and white blood cell count > 15,000/mm<sup>3</sup>. This tool was not validated in the intrapartum state. We aim to evaluate the performance of the first part of the CMQCC sepsis screen to identify infection-related morbidity in patients diagnosed with intraamniotic infection.A retrospective cohort study was performed of 541 patients diagnosed with suspected intraamniotic infection prior to delivery at a single center from July 2017 to June 2021. The primary outcome was composite maternal infectious morbidity (end-organ injury, bacteremia, intensive care unit admission, postpartum endometritis, postpartum readmission for infection, or maternal death) in birthing people who screened positive (two or more CMQCC sepsis screen criteria) compared with those who screened negative. Binary logistic multivariable regression was performed with backward selection including overall sepsis screen results as well as individual screening criteria. Data presented as odds ratio (OR) with a two-sided <i>p</i>-value of 0.05 was used for significance.Of the 541 reviewed cases, 336 (62%) screened positive while 205 (38%) screened negative. Birthing people with a positive sepsis screen in labor had a higher rate of composite maternal infectious morbidity compared with those with a negative screen, although this did not reach statistical significance (17.6% vs. 11.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.07; OR: 1.6 [0.96-2.68]). In evaluating individual criteria, heart rate > 110 bpm (<i>p</i> = 0.003; OR: 2.1 [1.3-3.4]) and respiratory rate > 24 bpm (<i>p</i> = 0.039; 5.7 [1.09-29.8]) were significantly associated with composite maternal infectious morbidity.Most birthing people with intraamniotic infection screen positive prior to delivery using the CMQCC sepsis screen. When looking at the sepsis screen's individual components, elevated heart rate and respiratory rate may be useful in identifying those at increased risk of infectious morbidity. · Most patients with intraamniotic infection screen positive prior to delivery using the CMQCC screen.. · The overall CMQCC sepsis screen was not associated with infectious morbidity.. · Elevated heart rate and respiratory rate may identify those at increased risk of morbidity..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2599-4813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) developed a pregnancy-adjusted sepsis screen that includes temperature ≥100.4°F, heart rate > 110 bpm, respiratory rate > 24 bpm, and white blood cell count > 15,000/mm3. This tool was not validated in the intrapartum state. We aim to evaluate the performance of the first part of the CMQCC sepsis screen to identify infection-related morbidity in patients diagnosed with intraamniotic infection.A retrospective cohort study was performed of 541 patients diagnosed with suspected intraamniotic infection prior to delivery at a single center from July 2017 to June 2021. The primary outcome was composite maternal infectious morbidity (end-organ injury, bacteremia, intensive care unit admission, postpartum endometritis, postpartum readmission for infection, or maternal death) in birthing people who screened positive (two or more CMQCC sepsis screen criteria) compared with those who screened negative. Binary logistic multivariable regression was performed with backward selection including overall sepsis screen results as well as individual screening criteria. Data presented as odds ratio (OR) with a two-sided p-value of 0.05 was used for significance.Of the 541 reviewed cases, 336 (62%) screened positive while 205 (38%) screened negative. Birthing people with a positive sepsis screen in labor had a higher rate of composite maternal infectious morbidity compared with those with a negative screen, although this did not reach statistical significance (17.6% vs. 11.7%; p = 0.07; OR: 1.6 [0.96-2.68]). In evaluating individual criteria, heart rate > 110 bpm (p = 0.003; OR: 2.1 [1.3-3.4]) and respiratory rate > 24 bpm (p = 0.039; 5.7 [1.09-29.8]) were significantly associated with composite maternal infectious morbidity.Most birthing people with intraamniotic infection screen positive prior to delivery using the CMQCC sepsis screen. When looking at the sepsis screen's individual components, elevated heart rate and respiratory rate may be useful in identifying those at increased risk of infectious morbidity. · Most patients with intraamniotic infection screen positive prior to delivery using the CMQCC screen.. · The overall CMQCC sepsis screen was not associated with infectious morbidity.. · Elevated heart rate and respiratory rate may identify those at increased risk of morbidity..

妊娠调整脓毒症筛查标准与产时羊膜内感染孕妇感染性发病风险的关系
加州孕产妇质量保健协作中心(CMQCC)开发了一种妊娠调整脓毒症筛查,包括体温≥100.4°F,心率> 110 bpm,呼吸频率> 24 bpm,白细胞计数> 15,000/mm3。该工具未在分娩状态下进行验证。我们的目的是评估CMQCC败血症筛查的第一部分的性能,以确定诊断为羊膜内感染的患者中感染相关的发病率。回顾性队列研究于2017年7月至2021年6月在单一中心对541例产前诊断为羊膜内感染的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结局是筛查阳性(两项或两项以上CMQCC败血症筛查标准)的分娩人群与筛查阴性的分娩人群的综合孕产妇感染发病率(终末器官损伤、菌血症、重症监护病房入院、产后子宫内膜炎、产后感染再入院或孕产妇死亡)。采用二元logistic多变量回归进行逆向选择,包括脓毒症总体筛查结果和个体筛查标准。数据以比值比(OR)表示,双侧p值为0.05。在541例审查病例中,336例(62%)筛查阳性,205例(38%)筛查阴性。分娩时脓毒症筛查呈阳性的孕妇与筛查呈阴性的孕妇相比,其综合孕产妇感染发病率更高,尽管这没有达到统计学意义(17.6% vs 11.7%;p = 0.07;或:1.6[0.96-2.68])。在评估个人标准时,心率> 110 bpm (p = 0.003;OR: 2.1[1.3-3.4])和呼吸频率> 24bpm (p = 0.039;5.7[1.09-29.8])与孕产妇综合感染性发病率显著相关。大多数分娩时羊膜内感染筛查阳性的人在分娩前使用CMQCC败血症筛查。当观察脓毒症筛查的各个组成部分时,心率和呼吸频率的升高可能有助于识别那些感染发病率增加的风险。·大多数羊膜内感染患者在分娩前使用CMQCC筛查呈阳性。·总体CMQCC败血症筛查与感染性发病率无关。·心率和呼吸频率升高可以识别出那些患病风险增加的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信