Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to quadriceps strengthening exercise in knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wei-Ju Chang, Alan Chiang, Nahian Chowdhury, Sam Adie, Justine M Naylor, Harrison Finn, Rodrigo R N Rizzo, Edward Gorgon, Edel O'Hagan, Siobhan M Schabrun
{"title":"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to quadriceps strengthening exercise in knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Wei-Ju Chang, Alan Chiang, Nahian Chowdhury, Sam Adie, Justine M Naylor, Harrison Finn, Rodrigo R N Rizzo, Edward Gorgon, Edel O'Hagan, Siobhan M Schabrun","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the feasibility, safety and perceived patient response of a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and quadriceps strengthening exercise intervention for knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm, participant-blinded, therapist-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with additional follow-up of pain and function at 3 months. Participants were randomised to receive active rTMS+exercise (AR+EX) or sham rTMS+exercise (SR+EX) twice weekly for 6 weeks while completing home exercises twice a week. Primary outcomes included recruitment rate, treatment attendance, dropouts, willingness to undergo therapy (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, 'not at all willing'=0 and 'very willing'=10), success of participant, therapist and outcome assessor blinding, adverse events and Global Perceived Effect Scale. Secondary outcomes were pain, function and measures of physiological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>86 people were screened, 31 (36%) were randomised, 28 (90%) completed the treatments and 3 (10%) dropouts at 3-month follow-up. Both groups had high treatment attendance (98.4% and 100%). All participants scored at least 7 on the willingness to undergo therapy scale. Blinding was successful. No adverse events were reported. At the postintervention assessment, 80% in the AR+EX group and 75% in the SR+EX group reported an improvement on the Global Perceived Effect Scale. Both groups demonstrated within-group improvements in pain at the postintervention assessment but not at the 3-month follow-up. Function improved only in the AR+EX group at the postintervention assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined rTMS and quadriceps strengthening exercise intervention for knee osteoarthritis is feasible, safe and well-received. A full-scale trial is justified to assess the clinical benefits of this novel treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12621001712897.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 5","pages":"e097293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the feasibility, safety and perceived patient response of a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and quadriceps strengthening exercise intervention for knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: A two-arm, participant-blinded, therapist-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with additional follow-up of pain and function at 3 months. Participants were randomised to receive active rTMS+exercise (AR+EX) or sham rTMS+exercise (SR+EX) twice weekly for 6 weeks while completing home exercises twice a week. Primary outcomes included recruitment rate, treatment attendance, dropouts, willingness to undergo therapy (11-point Numeric Rating Scale, 'not at all willing'=0 and 'very willing'=10), success of participant, therapist and outcome assessor blinding, adverse events and Global Perceived Effect Scale. Secondary outcomes were pain, function and measures of physiological mechanisms.

Results: 86 people were screened, 31 (36%) were randomised, 28 (90%) completed the treatments and 3 (10%) dropouts at 3-month follow-up. Both groups had high treatment attendance (98.4% and 100%). All participants scored at least 7 on the willingness to undergo therapy scale. Blinding was successful. No adverse events were reported. At the postintervention assessment, 80% in the AR+EX group and 75% in the SR+EX group reported an improvement on the Global Perceived Effect Scale. Both groups demonstrated within-group improvements in pain at the postintervention assessment but not at the 3-month follow-up. Function improved only in the AR+EX group at the postintervention assessment.

Conclusions: Combined rTMS and quadriceps strengthening exercise intervention for knee osteoarthritis is feasible, safe and well-received. A full-scale trial is justified to assess the clinical benefits of this novel treatment.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12621001712897.

重复经颅磁刺激作为膝关节骨关节炎四头肌强化锻炼的辅助:一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合股四头肌强化运动治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的可行性、安全性和患者感知反应。方法:两组,参与者盲法,治疗师盲法和评估盲法,随机对照试验,并在3个月时对疼痛和功能进行随访。参与者被随机分配接受主动rTMS+运动(AR+EX)或假rTMS+运动(SR+EX),每周两次,持续6周,同时每周完成两次家庭锻炼。主要结果包括招募率、治疗出席率、退出率、接受治疗的意愿(11分数字评定量表,“完全不愿意”=0,“非常愿意”=10)、参与者的成功、治疗师和结果评估者的盲法、不良事件和总体感知效应量表。次要结局是疼痛、功能和生理机制测量。结果:86人被筛选,31人(36%)被随机分配,28人(90%)完成治疗,3人(10%)在3个月的随访中退出。两组均有较高的治疗出勤率(98.4%和100%)。所有参与者在接受治疗的意愿量表上得分至少为7分。致盲是成功的。无不良事件报告。在干预后评估中,80%的AR+EX组和75%的SR+EX组报告了全球感知效应量表的改善。两组在干预后评估中均表现出组内疼痛的改善,但在3个月的随访中没有表现出改善。干预后评估时,只有AR+EX组功能有所改善。结论:rTMS联合股四头肌强化运动干预治疗膝关节骨性关节炎是可行、安全、有效的。一个全面的试验是合理的,以评估这种新治疗的临床效益。试验注册号:ACTRN12621001712897。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信