Recruitment Feasibility of Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease for a Multidisciplinary Intervention: Findings from the TEAM-PAD Trial.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ritesh Chimoriya, Sophie James, Leonard Kritharides, Shaundeep Sen, Samim Behdasht, Avinash Suryawanshi, Huw Davie, Janani Thillainadesan, Nadine Elias, Sarah Joy Aitken
{"title":"Recruitment Feasibility of Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease for a Multidisciplinary Intervention: Findings from the TEAM-PAD Trial.","authors":"Ritesh Chimoriya, Sophie James, Leonard Kritharides, Shaundeep Sen, Samim Behdasht, Avinash Suryawanshi, Huw Davie, Janani Thillainadesan, Nadine Elias, Sarah Joy Aitken","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a chronic progressive vascular condition with high morbidity and mortality, often necessitating comprehensive management to mitigate cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting patients with PAD for a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based care intervention, comparing its effectiveness to standard care within a clinical trial setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted as a cross-sectional analysis nested within the ongoing TEAM-PAD trial, this study targeted the recruitment of 30 patients within 12 weeks and evaluated recruitment, consent, and retention rates to assess feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 participants were consented within 11 weeks, with an overall recruitment rate of 36.4% and retention rate of 90%. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Participants had a mean age of 68.9 years and a high prevalence of comorbidities. The mean 10-year cardiovascular risk (SMART-REACH) was 42.8%. In the intervention group, implementing MDT recommendations is projected to reduce this risk by 12.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recruitment of patients with PAD into an MDT intervention was feasible and timely, with strong retention and well-balanced baseline characteristics. While modelled estimates suggest a potential benefit from MDT recommendations, these findings are preliminary and based on a small interim cohort. Evaluation of clinical effectiveness within the larger ongoing randomised controlled trial is needed to evaluate the medium and long-term impacts of integrated vascular care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.05.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a chronic progressive vascular condition with high morbidity and mortality, often necessitating comprehensive management to mitigate cardiovascular risk.

Aims: This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting patients with PAD for a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based care intervention, comparing its effectiveness to standard care within a clinical trial setting.

Methods: Conducted as a cross-sectional analysis nested within the ongoing TEAM-PAD trial, this study targeted the recruitment of 30 patients within 12 weeks and evaluated recruitment, consent, and retention rates to assess feasibility.

Results: A total of 30 participants were consented within 11 weeks, with an overall recruitment rate of 36.4% and retention rate of 90%. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Participants had a mean age of 68.9 years and a high prevalence of comorbidities. The mean 10-year cardiovascular risk (SMART-REACH) was 42.8%. In the intervention group, implementing MDT recommendations is projected to reduce this risk by 12.1%.

Conclusion: Recruitment of patients with PAD into an MDT intervention was feasible and timely, with strong retention and well-balanced baseline characteristics. While modelled estimates suggest a potential benefit from MDT recommendations, these findings are preliminary and based on a small interim cohort. Evaluation of clinical effectiveness within the larger ongoing randomised controlled trial is needed to evaluate the medium and long-term impacts of integrated vascular care.

外周动脉疾病患者多学科干预招募的可行性:来自TEAM-PAD试验的发现
外周动脉疾病(PAD)是一种高发病率和死亡率的慢性进行性血管疾病,通常需要综合治疗来降低心血管风险。目的:本研究评估了招募PAD患者进行基于多学科团队(MDT)的护理干预的可行性,并在临床试验环境中将其有效性与标准治疗进行了比较。方法:在正在进行的TEAM-PAD试验中进行横断面分析,本研究的目标是在12周内招募30名患者,并评估招募、同意率和保留率,以评估可行性。结果:11周内共纳入30名受试者,总体招募率为36.4%,保留率为90%。各组间基线特征平衡。参与者的平均年龄为68.9岁,合并症的患病率很高。平均10年心血管风险(SMART-REACH)为42.8%。在干预组中,实施MDT建议预计可将这一风险降低12.1%。结论:招募PAD患者进行MDT干预是可行且及时的,具有较强的保留性和平衡良好的基线特征。虽然模型估计表明MDT建议的潜在益处,但这些发现是初步的,并且是基于一个小的中期队列。需要在更大的正在进行的随机对照试验中评估临床有效性,以评估综合血管护理的中期和长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信