The governmentality of funding: Cultures of audit and compliance in Australian refugee and asylum seeker support organisations

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Alison Reid
{"title":"The governmentality of funding: Cultures of audit and compliance in Australian refugee and asylum seeker support organisations","authors":"Alison Reid","doi":"10.1111/taja.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Australia, people seeking refuge receive differing material and financial support depending on their status as an asylum seeker or refugee. Aside from statutory support, other community-based support is delivered mostly by non-government organisations and is typically funded by government grants. Securing funding is critical for the ongoing sustainability and survival of many organisations. However, much funding in the refugee and asylum seeker support sector is only available for services adhering to donor-determined funding agreements and narrowly defined programs with measurable criteria and strict reporting requirements. This paper examines the effects of these workplace technologies of governmentality, audit, and compliance, on workers within government-funded community-based support organisations in South Australia, drawing on ethnographic research undertaken during 2019 and 2020. This paper argues that significant transactional and moral burdens arise from funding and workplace governmentality, impacting organisational legitimacy and mission. Support organisations must be attuned to this and factor this knowledge into choices about their funding mix and operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"36 1","pages":"175-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/taja.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia, people seeking refuge receive differing material and financial support depending on their status as an asylum seeker or refugee. Aside from statutory support, other community-based support is delivered mostly by non-government organisations and is typically funded by government grants. Securing funding is critical for the ongoing sustainability and survival of many organisations. However, much funding in the refugee and asylum seeker support sector is only available for services adhering to donor-determined funding agreements and narrowly defined programs with measurable criteria and strict reporting requirements. This paper examines the effects of these workplace technologies of governmentality, audit, and compliance, on workers within government-funded community-based support organisations in South Australia, drawing on ethnographic research undertaken during 2019 and 2020. This paper argues that significant transactional and moral burdens arise from funding and workplace governmentality, impacting organisational legitimacy and mission. Support organisations must be attuned to this and factor this knowledge into choices about their funding mix and operations.

资金管理:澳大利亚难民和寻求庇护者支持组织的审计和合规文化
在澳大利亚,寻求庇护的人根据其寻求庇护者或难民的身份得到不同的物质和财政支助。除法定支援外,其他社区支援主要由非政府机构提供,通常由政府拨款资助。确保资金对许多组织的持续可持续性和生存至关重要。然而,难民和寻求庇护者支持部门的许多资金只能用于遵守捐助者确定的资金协议和具有可衡量标准和严格报告要求的狭义方案的服务。本文利用2019年和2020年进行的人种学研究,研究了这些工作场所治理、审计和合规技术对南澳大利亚政府资助的社区支持组织内工人的影响。本文认为,重大的交易和道德负担来自资金和工作场所治理,影响组织的合法性和使命。支持组织必须适应这一点,并将这一知识纳入其资金组合和运营的选择中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信