{"title":"A hypothesis exploring gender differences in gait variability using rhythmic auditory stimulation in individuals with Parkinson’s disease","authors":"Shaye M. Tiell","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is an incurable and progressive neurodegenerative disorder with worldwide prevalence. The application of external cueing devices to mitigate motor symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and improve gait has gained significant attention in recent decades. Many of these studies have yielded significant findings, however, they often overlook gender-related differences that may underlie significant outcomes in longitudinal PD studies and warrant consideration. A review of existing literature shows significant gender differences within this population including differences in disease epidemiology, gait, and dual-tasking abilities. Thus, this paper presents the hypothesis that because males tend to be more severely affected by PD, females are more likely to benefit from external cueing devices such as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS). Preliminary data using a small cohort supports this hypothesis, warranting further investigation. Validation of this hypothesis will highlight the importance of conducting inclusive research studies and design approaches. Incorporating gender-specific considerations into treatment plans will optimize the efficacy of these therapies and thus lead to a more significant and widespread reduction in disability and improvement in life for individuals managing the symptoms of PD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 111660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725000994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is an incurable and progressive neurodegenerative disorder with worldwide prevalence. The application of external cueing devices to mitigate motor symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and improve gait has gained significant attention in recent decades. Many of these studies have yielded significant findings, however, they often overlook gender-related differences that may underlie significant outcomes in longitudinal PD studies and warrant consideration. A review of existing literature shows significant gender differences within this population including differences in disease epidemiology, gait, and dual-tasking abilities. Thus, this paper presents the hypothesis that because males tend to be more severely affected by PD, females are more likely to benefit from external cueing devices such as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS). Preliminary data using a small cohort supports this hypothesis, warranting further investigation. Validation of this hypothesis will highlight the importance of conducting inclusive research studies and design approaches. Incorporating gender-specific considerations into treatment plans will optimize the efficacy of these therapies and thus lead to a more significant and widespread reduction in disability and improvement in life for individuals managing the symptoms of PD.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.