{"title":"Algorithmic management stressors and aggressive driving behavior: Roles of attentiveness and regulatory focus","authors":"Zhenduo Zhang , Jianing Guo , Qian Li , Huan Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise of ride-hailing platforms has changed customers’ travel preferences and improved traffic efficiency. However, even though they are vital to ensuring customers’ safety and satisfaction, the roles of algorithmic management stressors in shaping ride-hailing drivers’ driving behavior are not well understood. This study draws on affective event theory to theorize how algorithmic management challenge and hindrance stressors manifest themselves in impacting aggressive driving behavior in the context of ride-hailing services. A time-lagged questionnaire survey design was used to collect data from 330 drivers working for ride-hailing services at four different time points. Latent mediation-moderation structural equation modeling was used to test the conceptual model. The results indicate that: 1) Algorithmic management challenge stressors undermine, while hindrance stressors promote, aggressive driving behavior. 2) Attentiveness mediates the indirect impacts of both algorithmic management challenge and hindrance stressors on aggressive driving behavior. 3) Promotion regulatory focus amplifies the indirect negative relationship that links algorithmic management challenge stressors through attentiveness to aggressive driving behavior. 4) Prevention regulatory focus amplifies the indirect positive relationship that links algorithmic management hindrance stressors through attentiveness to aggressive driving behavior. This study incorporates the aggressive driving behavior of ride-hailing drivers in the algorithmic era into road safety research by integrating the affective pathway of attention and drivers’ characteristics. The aim is to contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms and boundaries between algorithmic management stressors and aggressive driving behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 16-29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rise of ride-hailing platforms has changed customers’ travel preferences and improved traffic efficiency. However, even though they are vital to ensuring customers’ safety and satisfaction, the roles of algorithmic management stressors in shaping ride-hailing drivers’ driving behavior are not well understood. This study draws on affective event theory to theorize how algorithmic management challenge and hindrance stressors manifest themselves in impacting aggressive driving behavior in the context of ride-hailing services. A time-lagged questionnaire survey design was used to collect data from 330 drivers working for ride-hailing services at four different time points. Latent mediation-moderation structural equation modeling was used to test the conceptual model. The results indicate that: 1) Algorithmic management challenge stressors undermine, while hindrance stressors promote, aggressive driving behavior. 2) Attentiveness mediates the indirect impacts of both algorithmic management challenge and hindrance stressors on aggressive driving behavior. 3) Promotion regulatory focus amplifies the indirect negative relationship that links algorithmic management challenge stressors through attentiveness to aggressive driving behavior. 4) Prevention regulatory focus amplifies the indirect positive relationship that links algorithmic management hindrance stressors through attentiveness to aggressive driving behavior. This study incorporates the aggressive driving behavior of ride-hailing drivers in the algorithmic era into road safety research by integrating the affective pathway of attention and drivers’ characteristics. The aim is to contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms and boundaries between algorithmic management stressors and aggressive driving behavior.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.