Intrauterine systems and gynaecological malignancies: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

IF 5.2
Alice Lessa, Anna Podlasek
{"title":"Intrauterine systems and gynaecological malignancies: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","authors":"Alice Lessa, Anna Podlasek","doi":"10.3399/bjgp25X742329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intrauterine system (IUS) is globally recognised as a reliable, safe, and cost-effective form of contraception.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses aims to synthesise current evidence regarding the association between IUS usage and the risk of gynaecological malignancies, specifically ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases was conducted up to July 2024 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining any type of IUS in relation to gynaecological cancers. The screening and data extraction processes adhered to PRISMA guidelines and random-effects meta-analysis was employed for data synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 323 titles and abstracts were screened, leading to the review of 40 full texts and the inclusion of 21 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In the preliminary analysis, 10 individual studies reported on ovarian cancer, 9 on endometrial cancer, and 8 on cervical cancer, all indicating a decreased odds ratio for cancer associated with ever-use of the IUS (0.68 [95% CI = 0.56 to 0.83], 0.41 [95% CI = 0.31 to 0.54], and 0.60 [95% CI = 0.46 to 0.79], respectively; all <i>P</i><0.001). Additionally, two studies on breast cancer showed a non-statistically significant increased odds ratio (1.21 [95% CI = 0.90 to 1.61], <i>P</i> = 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ever-use of intrauterine contraception is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, while suggesting a potential increase in breast cancer risk. These findings can inform patient counselling to better balance the benefits and risks of IUS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"75 suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X742329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intrauterine system (IUS) is globally recognised as a reliable, safe, and cost-effective form of contraception.

Aim: This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses aims to synthesise current evidence regarding the association between IUS usage and the risk of gynaecological malignancies, specifically ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and breast cancer.

Method: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases was conducted up to July 2024 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining any type of IUS in relation to gynaecological cancers. The screening and data extraction processes adhered to PRISMA guidelines and random-effects meta-analysis was employed for data synthesis.

Results: A total of 323 titles and abstracts were screened, leading to the review of 40 full texts and the inclusion of 21 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In the preliminary analysis, 10 individual studies reported on ovarian cancer, 9 on endometrial cancer, and 8 on cervical cancer, all indicating a decreased odds ratio for cancer associated with ever-use of the IUS (0.68 [95% CI = 0.56 to 0.83], 0.41 [95% CI = 0.31 to 0.54], and 0.60 [95% CI = 0.46 to 0.79], respectively; all P<0.001). Additionally, two studies on breast cancer showed a non-statistically significant increased odds ratio (1.21 [95% CI = 0.90 to 1.61], P = 0.21).

Conclusion: Ever-use of intrauterine contraception is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, while suggesting a potential increase in breast cancer risk. These findings can inform patient counselling to better balance the benefits and risks of IUS use.

宫内系统和妇科恶性肿瘤:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:宫内系统(IUS)是全球公认的可靠、安全、经济有效的避孕方式。目的:本综述综合了系统评价和荟萃分析,旨在综合目前有关IUS使用与妇科恶性肿瘤(特别是卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌、宫颈癌和乳腺癌)风险之间关系的证据。方法:全面检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Library和Ovid数据库,进行截至2024年7月的系统评价和荟萃分析,检查与妇科癌症相关的任何类型的IUS。筛选和数据提取过程遵循PRISMA指南,采用随机效应荟萃分析进行数据综合。结果:共筛选了323篇标题和摘要,共纳入了40篇全文,21篇系统综述和meta分析。在初步分析中,10项单独研究报告了卵巢癌,9项研究报告了子宫内膜癌,8项研究报告了宫颈癌,所有研究都表明,长期使用IUS与癌症的比值比降低(分别为0.68 [95% CI = 0.56至0.83],0.41 [95% CI = 0.31至0.54]和0.60 [95% CI = 0.46至0.79];所有PP = 0.21)。结论:长期使用宫内避孕与卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌的风险降低有关,但可能增加乳腺癌的风险。这些发现可以为患者提供咨询,以更好地平衡使用IUS的益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信