{"title":"Intrauterine systems and gynaecological malignancies: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","authors":"Alice Lessa, Anna Podlasek","doi":"10.3399/bjgp25X742329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intrauterine system (IUS) is globally recognised as a reliable, safe, and cost-effective form of contraception.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses aims to synthesise current evidence regarding the association between IUS usage and the risk of gynaecological malignancies, specifically ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases was conducted up to July 2024 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining any type of IUS in relation to gynaecological cancers. The screening and data extraction processes adhered to PRISMA guidelines and random-effects meta-analysis was employed for data synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 323 titles and abstracts were screened, leading to the review of 40 full texts and the inclusion of 21 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In the preliminary analysis, 10 individual studies reported on ovarian cancer, 9 on endometrial cancer, and 8 on cervical cancer, all indicating a decreased odds ratio for cancer associated with ever-use of the IUS (0.68 [95% CI = 0.56 to 0.83], 0.41 [95% CI = 0.31 to 0.54], and 0.60 [95% CI = 0.46 to 0.79], respectively; all <i>P</i><0.001). Additionally, two studies on breast cancer showed a non-statistically significant increased odds ratio (1.21 [95% CI = 0.90 to 1.61], <i>P</i> = 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ever-use of intrauterine contraception is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, while suggesting a potential increase in breast cancer risk. These findings can inform patient counselling to better balance the benefits and risks of IUS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"75 suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp25X742329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The intrauterine system (IUS) is globally recognised as a reliable, safe, and cost-effective form of contraception.
Aim: This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses aims to synthesise current evidence regarding the association between IUS usage and the risk of gynaecological malignancies, specifically ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and breast cancer.
Method: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases was conducted up to July 2024 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining any type of IUS in relation to gynaecological cancers. The screening and data extraction processes adhered to PRISMA guidelines and random-effects meta-analysis was employed for data synthesis.
Results: A total of 323 titles and abstracts were screened, leading to the review of 40 full texts and the inclusion of 21 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In the preliminary analysis, 10 individual studies reported on ovarian cancer, 9 on endometrial cancer, and 8 on cervical cancer, all indicating a decreased odds ratio for cancer associated with ever-use of the IUS (0.68 [95% CI = 0.56 to 0.83], 0.41 [95% CI = 0.31 to 0.54], and 0.60 [95% CI = 0.46 to 0.79], respectively; all P<0.001). Additionally, two studies on breast cancer showed a non-statistically significant increased odds ratio (1.21 [95% CI = 0.90 to 1.61], P = 0.21).
Conclusion: Ever-use of intrauterine contraception is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, while suggesting a potential increase in breast cancer risk. These findings can inform patient counselling to better balance the benefits and risks of IUS use.