Machine-Learned Codes from EHR Data Predict Hard Outcomes Better than Human-Assigned ICD Codes.

IF 4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Machine learning and knowledge extraction Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.3390/make7020036
Ying Yin, Yijun Shao, Phillip Ma, Qing Zeng-Treitler, Stuart J Nelson
{"title":"Machine-Learned Codes from EHR Data Predict Hard Outcomes Better than Human-Assigned ICD Codes.","authors":"Ying Yin, Yijun Shao, Phillip Ma, Qing Zeng-Treitler, Stuart J Nelson","doi":"10.3390/make7020036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We used machine learning (ML) to characterize 894,154 medical records of outpatient visits from the Veterans Administration Central Data Warehouse (VA CDW) by the likelihood of assignment of 200 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code blocks. Using four different predictive models, we found the ML-derived predictions for the code blocks were consistently more effective in predicting death or 90-day rehospitalization than the assigned code block in the record. We reviewed records of ICD chapter assignments. The review revealed that the ML-predicted chapter assignments were consistently better than those humanly assigned. Impact factor analysis, a method of explanation of AI findings that was developed in our group, demonstrated little effect on any one assigned ICD code block but a marked impact on the ML-derived code blocks of kidney disease as well as several other morbidities. In this study, machine learning was much better than human code assignment at predicting the relatively rare outcomes of death or rehospitalization. Future work will address generalizability using other datasets, as well as addressing coding that is more nuanced than that of the categorization provided by code blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":93033,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning and knowledge extraction","volume":"7 2","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning and knowledge extraction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/make7020036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used machine learning (ML) to characterize 894,154 medical records of outpatient visits from the Veterans Administration Central Data Warehouse (VA CDW) by the likelihood of assignment of 200 International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code blocks. Using four different predictive models, we found the ML-derived predictions for the code blocks were consistently more effective in predicting death or 90-day rehospitalization than the assigned code block in the record. We reviewed records of ICD chapter assignments. The review revealed that the ML-predicted chapter assignments were consistently better than those humanly assigned. Impact factor analysis, a method of explanation of AI findings that was developed in our group, demonstrated little effect on any one assigned ICD code block but a marked impact on the ML-derived code blocks of kidney disease as well as several other morbidities. In this study, machine learning was much better than human code assignment at predicting the relatively rare outcomes of death or rehospitalization. Future work will address generalizability using other datasets, as well as addressing coding that is more nuanced than that of the categorization provided by code blocks.

来自EHR数据的机器学习代码比人工分配的ICD代码更能预测硬结果。
我们使用机器学习(ML)对来自退伍军人管理局中央数据仓库(VA CDW)的894,154例门诊病历进行了表征,方法是对200个国际疾病分类(ICD)代码块进行可能性分配。使用四种不同的预测模型,我们发现ml衍生的代码块预测在预测死亡或90天再住院方面始终比记录中指定的代码块更有效。我们回顾了ICD章节分配的记录。回顾显示,机器学习预测的章节分配始终优于人类分配的章节分配。影响因子分析是我们小组开发的一种解释人工智能发现的方法,它对任何指定的ICD代码块几乎没有影响,但对肾脏疾病以及其他几种疾病的ml衍生代码块有显著影响。在这项研究中,机器学习在预测相对罕见的死亡或再住院结果方面比人类代码分配要好得多。未来的工作将使用其他数据集来解决通用性问题,以及解决比代码块提供的分类更细微的编码问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信