Effects of Oral Doxofylline and Procaterol on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Q1 Medicine
Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Sarawut Panichaporn, Thiravit Siriyothipun, Pitchayapa Ruchiwit
{"title":"Effects of Oral Doxofylline and Procaterol on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Study.","authors":"Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Sarawut Panichaporn, Thiravit Siriyothipun, Pitchayapa Ruchiwit","doi":"10.3390/medsci13020049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Oral bronchodilators may serve as an adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of oral doxofylline and oral procaterol on lung function and clinical symptoms in COPD patients. <b>Methods</b>: A crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with clinically stable COPD. Participants first received either doxofylline or procaterol for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period. Assessments included the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). Pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry with bronchodilator (BD) testing and all adverse events were recorded. <b>Results</b>: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to begin treatment with either doxofylline or procaterol. Their mean age was 71.7 ± 9.4 years. After four weeks of treatment, the doxofylline group showed significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function parameters (post-BD peak expiratory flow and post-BD forced expiratory flow 25-75) compared to the procaterol group. However, there were no significant differences in mMRC scores, CAT scores, or 6MWD between the two groups. More neurological adverse events were observed in the doxofylline group compared to the procaterol group (35% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.044). <b>Conclusions</b>: Doxofylline improved pulmonary function in COPD patients but did not provide superior functional performance compared to procaterol. Neurological adverse events were more frequently associated with doxofylline. Doxofylline may serve as an adjunctive therapy to enhance pulmonary function in COPD patients, but caution is advised due to its potential side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13020049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral bronchodilators may serve as an adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of oral doxofylline and oral procaterol on lung function and clinical symptoms in COPD patients. Methods: A crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with clinically stable COPD. Participants first received either doxofylline or procaterol for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period. Assessments included the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD). Pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry with bronchodilator (BD) testing and all adverse events were recorded. Results: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to begin treatment with either doxofylline or procaterol. Their mean age was 71.7 ± 9.4 years. After four weeks of treatment, the doxofylline group showed significantly greater improvement in pulmonary function parameters (post-BD peak expiratory flow and post-BD forced expiratory flow 25-75) compared to the procaterol group. However, there were no significant differences in mMRC scores, CAT scores, or 6MWD between the two groups. More neurological adverse events were observed in the doxofylline group compared to the procaterol group (35% vs. 5%, p = 0.044). Conclusions: Doxofylline improved pulmonary function in COPD patients but did not provide superior functional performance compared to procaterol. Neurological adverse events were more frequently associated with doxofylline. Doxofylline may serve as an adjunctive therapy to enhance pulmonary function in COPD patients, but caution is advised due to its potential side effects.

口服多索茶碱和Procaterol对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的影响:一项随机交叉研究。
背景:口服支气管扩张剂可作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的辅助治疗。本研究旨在评价口服多索茶碱和口服procaterol对COPD患者肺功能和临床症状的影响。方法:对临床稳定期COPD患者进行交叉随机对照试验。参与者首先接受多索茶碱或procaterol治疗4周,然后是1周的洗脱期。评估包括改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表、COPD评估测试(CAT)评分和6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。采用肺量测定法和支气管扩张剂(BD)试验评估肺功能,并记录所有不良事件。结果:20例患者被随机分配开始使用多索茶碱或普罗卡特罗治疗。平均年龄71.7±9.4岁。治疗四周后,与procaterol组相比,多索茶碱组在肺功能参数(bd后呼气峰值流量和bd后用力呼气流量25-75)方面的改善明显更大。然而,两组之间的mMRC评分、CAT评分或6MWD均无显著差异。与procaterol组相比,多索茶碱组观察到更多的神经系统不良事件(35%比5%,p = 0.044)。结论:多索茶碱可改善COPD患者的肺功能,但与procaterol相比,功能表现不佳。神经系统不良事件更常与多索茶碱相关。多索茶碱可作为增强COPD患者肺功能的辅助治疗,但由于其潜在的副作用,建议谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信