Femur Fractures Distal to Long and Short Cephalomedullary Nails: A Comparative Multicenter Study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Aleksander P Mika, Ridge Maxson, Andres F Moreno-Diaz, Robert B Ponce, Sean P Wrenn, Cade A Morris, Jonathan C Savakus, Matthew Yeager, Atticus Coscia, Lyle Johnson, Nathaniel Schaffer, Jacquelyn S Pennings, Claudia A Maki, Mark Hake, Joey P Johnson, Phillip M Mitchell
{"title":"Femur Fractures Distal to Long and Short Cephalomedullary Nails: A Comparative Multicenter Study.","authors":"Aleksander P Mika, Ridge Maxson, Andres F Moreno-Diaz, Robert B Ponce, Sean P Wrenn, Cade A Morris, Jonathan C Savakus, Matthew Yeager, Atticus Coscia, Lyle Johnson, Nathaniel Schaffer, Jacquelyn S Pennings, Claudia A Maki, Mark Hake, Joey P Johnson, Phillip M Mitchell","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used to treat intertrochanteric hip fractures. Subsequent fractures distal to an existing CMN are a challenging complication with patterns and management that vary based on nail length. Whether short or long CMNs allow for less complicated surgical revision or better postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment strategies and outcomes of fractures distal to short versus long CMNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study identified 58 patients who underwent surgical management of a fracture distal to a short CMN (n = 30) or long CMN (n = 28) following low-energy trauma between 2005 and 2022. Demographics, injury characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared between the cohorts. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare outcomes of exchange CMN versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most fractures below short CMNs were managed with exchange CMN or a nail-plate combination (58%), whereas most fractures below long CMNs were treated with ORIF (89%). No differences were found between short and long CMN revision surgery in terms of surgical time, estimated blood loss, use of fluoroscopy, transfusion, length of stay, or postoperative complications. Compared with ORIF, exchange CMN was associated with similar odds of needing a transfusion and experiencing a postoperative complication but a greater likelihood of being permitted to bear weight as tolerated after surgery (odds ratio 43.1; 95% confidence interval 4.1 to 457.6) and being discharged home (odds ratio 27.3; 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 367.6).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the largest series of fractures distal to a CMN to date. Surgical morbidity, surgical time, and use of fluoroscopy were similar in patients with short and long CMNs. Although managing these injuries with exchange CMN was associated with comparable morbidity to ORIF, a notable functional advantage was observed with exchange CMN by facilitating earlier full weight-bearing and discharge home.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"1219-1227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used to treat intertrochanteric hip fractures. Subsequent fractures distal to an existing CMN are a challenging complication with patterns and management that vary based on nail length. Whether short or long CMNs allow for less complicated surgical revision or better postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment strategies and outcomes of fractures distal to short versus long CMNs.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study identified 58 patients who underwent surgical management of a fracture distal to a short CMN (n = 30) or long CMN (n = 28) following low-energy trauma between 2005 and 2022. Demographics, injury characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared between the cohorts. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare outcomes of exchange CMN versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Results: Most fractures below short CMNs were managed with exchange CMN or a nail-plate combination (58%), whereas most fractures below long CMNs were treated with ORIF (89%). No differences were found between short and long CMN revision surgery in terms of surgical time, estimated blood loss, use of fluoroscopy, transfusion, length of stay, or postoperative complications. Compared with ORIF, exchange CMN was associated with similar odds of needing a transfusion and experiencing a postoperative complication but a greater likelihood of being permitted to bear weight as tolerated after surgery (odds ratio 43.1; 95% confidence interval 4.1 to 457.6) and being discharged home (odds ratio 27.3; 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 367.6).

Discussion: This is the largest series of fractures distal to a CMN to date. Surgical morbidity, surgical time, and use of fluoroscopy were similar in patients with short and long CMNs. Although managing these injuries with exchange CMN was associated with comparable morbidity to ORIF, a notable functional advantage was observed with exchange CMN by facilitating earlier full weight-bearing and discharge home.

长、短头髓钉远端股骨骨折:一项多中心比较研究。
简介:头髓钉(CMNs)通常用于治疗股骨粗隆间骨折。现有CMN远端的后续骨折是一种具有挑战性的并发症,其模式和处理方法因指甲长度而异。短cmn或长cmn是否允许更简单的手术翻修或更好的术后结果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较短CMNs和长CMNs远端骨折的治疗策略和结果。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究确定了2005年至2022年间58例低能量创伤后短CMN远端骨折(n = 30)或长CMN远端骨折(n = 28)的手术治疗患者。比较两组患者的人口学特征、损伤特征和围手术期结果。采用多变量线性回归比较交换CMN与切开复位内固定(ORIF)的结果。结果:大多数短CMNs以下骨折采用交换CMN或钉钢板联合治疗(58%),而大多数长CMNs以下骨折采用ORIF治疗(89%)。短期和长期CMN翻修手术在手术时间、估计失血量、透视使用、输血、住院时间或术后并发症方面没有差异。与ORIF相比,交换CMN需要输血和经历术后并发症的几率相似,但术后允许耐受体重的可能性更大(优势比43.1;95%可信区间4.1 ~ 457.6)和出院回家(优势比27.3;95%置信区间2.0至367.6)。讨论:这是迄今为止最大的CMN远端骨折系列。短CMNs和长CMNs患者的手术发病率、手术时间和透视使用相似。虽然用交换CMN治疗这些损伤的发病率与ORIF相当,但观察到交换CMN通过促进早期完全负重和出院回家而具有显着的功能优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信