Epidemiological and Socioeconomic Disparities in the 1742-1743 Epidemic: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Centers and Indigenous Populations Along the Royal Road.

IF 2.2
Jorge Hugo Villafañe
{"title":"Epidemiological and Socioeconomic Disparities in the 1742-1743 Epidemic: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Centers and Indigenous Populations Along the Royal Road.","authors":"Jorge Hugo Villafañe","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia6020025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Epidemics have historically shaped societies, influencing demographic structures, social organization, and economic stability. The 1742-1743 epidemic had a profound impact on populations along the Royal Road (Camino Real), the main colonial corridor between Buenos Aires and Lima. However, its specific demographic and socio-economic effects remain underexplored. This study aims to examine these impacts of the 1742-1743 epidemic through a comparative analysis of urban centers and Indigenous communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A historical-comparative approach was employed, analyzing secondary sources including parish records and colonial administrative documents. This study assessed excess mortality and socio-economic consequences across different population groups and settlement types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mortality rates increased dramatically-up to twelve times the pre-epidemic average in Cordova (Córdoba) and by 45% in Santa Fe-disproportionately affecting Indigenous and enslaved populations. Urban centers experienced severe economic disruption and slow recovery, whereas Indigenous communities and Jesuit missions demonstrated greater resilience. Their communal strategies and early isolation measures contributed to a faster demographic stabilization. Additionally, the epidemic weakened colonial governance in some areas, altering local power structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The epidemic of 1742-1743 revealed divergent patterns of vulnerability and resilience. Comparative analysis underscores recurring themes in the epidemic response and recovery, drawing relevant parallels with contemporary crises such as COVID-19. Recognizing these historical patterns of adaptation can inform present and future public health strategies. The terminology \"plague\" is used based on contemporary sources and not confirmed clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6020025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Epidemics have historically shaped societies, influencing demographic structures, social organization, and economic stability. The 1742-1743 epidemic had a profound impact on populations along the Royal Road (Camino Real), the main colonial corridor between Buenos Aires and Lima. However, its specific demographic and socio-economic effects remain underexplored. This study aims to examine these impacts of the 1742-1743 epidemic through a comparative analysis of urban centers and Indigenous communities.

Methods: A historical-comparative approach was employed, analyzing secondary sources including parish records and colonial administrative documents. This study assessed excess mortality and socio-economic consequences across different population groups and settlement types.

Results: Mortality rates increased dramatically-up to twelve times the pre-epidemic average in Cordova (Córdoba) and by 45% in Santa Fe-disproportionately affecting Indigenous and enslaved populations. Urban centers experienced severe economic disruption and slow recovery, whereas Indigenous communities and Jesuit missions demonstrated greater resilience. Their communal strategies and early isolation measures contributed to a faster demographic stabilization. Additionally, the epidemic weakened colonial governance in some areas, altering local power structures.

Conclusions: The epidemic of 1742-1743 revealed divergent patterns of vulnerability and resilience. Comparative analysis underscores recurring themes in the epidemic response and recovery, drawing relevant parallels with contemporary crises such as COVID-19. Recognizing these historical patterns of adaptation can inform present and future public health strategies. The terminology "plague" is used based on contemporary sources and not confirmed clinically.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

1742-1743年流行病中的流行病学和社会经济差异:对皇家大道沿线城市中心和土著人口的比较分析。
背景/目标:流行病在历史上塑造了社会,影响了人口结构、社会组织和经济稳定。1742年至1743年的流行病对布宜诺斯艾利斯和利马之间的主要殖民地走廊皇家大道(Camino Real)沿线的人口产生了深远的影响。然而,其具体的人口和社会经济影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在通过对城市中心和土著社区的比较分析来检查1742-1743年流行病的这些影响。方法:采用历史比较的方法,分析包括教区记录和殖民地行政文件在内的二手资料。本研究评估了不同人口群体和定居类型的过高死亡率和社会经济后果。结果:死亡率急剧上升,科尔多瓦(Córdoba)的死亡率是疫情前平均水平的12倍,圣达菲的死亡率上升了45%,对土著和被奴役人口的影响尤为严重。城市中心经历了严重的经济破坏和缓慢的恢复,而土著社区和耶稣会传教士则表现出更强的恢复能力。它们的社区战略和早期隔离措施有助于更快地稳定人口。此外,这一流行病削弱了一些地区的殖民统治,改变了地方权力结构。结论:1742-1743年的流行表现出不同的脆弱性和恢复力模式。对比分析强调了疫情应对和恢复中反复出现的主题,并将其与COVID-19等当代危机进行了相关类比。认识到这些历史适应模式可以为当前和未来的公共卫生战略提供信息。“鼠疫”一词的使用是基于当代资料,未经临床证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信